Both these web access management tools are great. However, from my point of view, IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is hard to use due to its complicated UI compared to Oracle Access Management.
Both are great products. From a technical point of view Oracle Access Management implementation is relatively simple due to the possibility to adjust the functionality and appearance of the system to the customer's needs. SAP is a robust product but not user friendly and more …
Oracle Access Management is more user-friendly. Oracle Access Management is easily accessible from anywhere. Installation of Oracle Access Management can be done with ease, there's no need for a third-party. Technical support of Oracle Access Management needs to be improved. …
We've yet to see how Oracle Access Management stacks up against other software, though in the near future it is part of the plan. We decided to give Oracle Access Management a shot because we heard great things about it. We often change passwords and have unique passwords for …
It is really easy to have Oracle Access Manager implemented on a Unix based platform. The other integration/interfacing application were also Oracle products, hence the winner was oracle. We used it with Java based and Web aplications with API and have integrate a friendly …