Oracle Data Integration Platform Cloud vs. Tray.io

For daily transactional information and customer data needs it has been an extremely fast and reliable system. Several thousand users are able to connect many third party tools and run a large number of extracts while still experiencing great performance. For smaller systems in use with limited user accounts this system is less appropriate due to maintenance resources required.

Incentivized

Best suited for mid and low level organizations due to its pricing. Cannot implement API based integrations so difficult to implement certain flows and extra work needs to be done due to this. Can improve in this case but overall it is a good to go option if you have fewer integrations requirements

• ODI uses ELT architecture, which enhances the load performance and is very scalable.
• ODI is platform independent. It supports all platforms, hardware and operating systems.
• It comes with pre-built integration, allowing immediate data replication, transformation, and data governance while ensuring data quality.

Incentivized

• Automate and schedule manual tasks
• Easy to use
• Very helpful and reactive support team

Incentivized

• Training and ramping up to learn all the Oracle specific intricacies.
• Security concerns with administering some of the tools to end users.

Incentivized

• Cannot create API

We are longtime ODI on-premise users. So, it was easy for us to migrate to the ODI cloud rather than implementing another solution.

Incentivized

Tray.io has much lower pricing when compared to MuleSoft and has more in build connectors and support than Zapier

• Ability to setup reliable disaster recovery.
• Upgrades and performance monitoring tools are readily available.

Incentivized

• Increased efficiency
• Reduced Costs
• Increased Productivity

Incentivized