IBM Cognos Analytics vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cognos Analytics
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.
$10
per month per user
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process. Oracle Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) Platform is a framework of the technical and functional components shared among Cloud EPM processes.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
On Demand - Standard
$10.00
per month per user
On Demand - Premium
$40.00
per month per user
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Considered Both Products
IBM Cognos Analytics

No answer on this topic

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
I was not involved in the product selection and therefore cannot comment
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
It is a top 3 product in its class. Having used EPM the most I would rate it the highest. Also used PBCS very successfully. This was selected as the path of least resistance. The upgrade was from HFM to EPM Cloud using JDE as the GL.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.9
102 Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
3 Ratings
35% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.593 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.8100 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.497 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
8.1
104 Ratings
0% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
23 Ratings
11% above category average
Drill-down analysis8.1102 Ratings9.722 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.1103 Ratings9.521 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.872 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.4100 Ratings8.419 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
8.3
104 Ratings
1% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.0
19 Ratings
10% above category average
Publish to Web8.327 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.798 Ratings8.919 Ratings
Report Versioning8.626 Ratings9.017 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.0101 Ratings9.015 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.112 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
8.1
94 Ratings
0% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
3 Ratings
25% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.089 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.286 Ratings6.83 Ratings
Predictive Analytics8.182 Ratings5.13 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
8.3
99 Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
24 Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.496 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.395 Ratings9.323 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.295 Ratings8.920 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.424 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.377 Ratings9.321 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.3
82 Ratings
9% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.976 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Mobile Application7.367 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.173 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.5
61 Ratings
5% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
REST API7.358 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API7.557 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames8.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API6.911 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)7.110 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)7.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.8
38 Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings9.230 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.738 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.937 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.635 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.833 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
20 Ratings
13% above category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings9.817 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings9.714 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.913 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.914 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.612 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.716 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.216 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.4
34 Ratings
2% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.629 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings7.932 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.430 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings7.828 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings8.519 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.7
25 Ratings
4% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.225 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.124 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
36 Ratings
9% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings9.634 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.632 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings8.228 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 9.9 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO Jaspersoft Community Edition
TIBCO Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(127 ratings)
8.9
(46 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.7
(27 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(8 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
8.6
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(5 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(8 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(7 ratings)
8.2
(16 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(2 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(3 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.3
(3 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cognos AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Our first and most basic scenario was to automatize the creation and publication/sharing of business reports that used to be created manually by employees throughout our organization. Using Cognos for that first use case worked well. The advanced analytics functionalities we used on the aggregated data were also as expected. However, the user interface is not always intuitive, and there is a steep learning curve, so I would recommend Cognos only to large organizations where there is a need for the most advanced functionalities (AI analysis/prediction).
Read full review
Oracle
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • We use the tool for data modeling as it helps in predictive data analysis for complex data, which is very similar to real-life scenarios.
  • Options of customizing & scheduling reports as per our requirements basis.
  • Has mobile application which works seamless.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Sometimes there might be performance issues when dealing with large and complex data.
  • Although IBM provides full documentation but sometimes it's difficult to find answers to questions and connect with their customer support.
  • It relies on external tools for data cleaning, transformation and also for some integration tasks. It can also improve on providing wider range of data sources for integration.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The limitation of constrained out of the box dimensions that requires ripping the initial implementation to add the new dimensions is a major drawback.
  • Smartview interface is cumbersome for many.
  • The only financial adapter is available for integration for other modules we have to go with file-based uploads which is cumbersome and not real-time.
  • It is very costly in terms of licensing unlike other Oracle products.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
Read full review
Oracle
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
Read full review
Oracle
EPM usability is good in some modules but needs some improvement in others
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
Read full review
Oracle
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
IBM
Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
Read full review
Oracle
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
Read full review
Oracle
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
Read full review
Oracle
I suggest doubling the time to implement from the initial quote you get from the Sales team. That's always been the case for me for multiple EPMs now. The out-of-the-box functionality of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is pretty robust so I appreciate that and it really helped us get the ball rolling quickly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
In the past Management had used Excel and Workiva capabilities to create the reporting dashboards that were being used to make decisions. Since switching to IBM Cognos Analytics the Company has been much more efficient and decision making has been streamlined. IBM Cognos Analytics was chosen due to its reputation and data visualization capabilities and neither have been wrong.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
The Cognos architecture is well suited for scalability. However, the architecture must be designed with scalability in mind from day one of the implementation. We recently upgraded from 10.1 to 10.2.1 and took the opportunity to revamp our architecture. It is now poised for future growth and scalability.
Read full review
Oracle
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • High ROI with well designed solutions. Supported by scalable deployment, robust security model and ability to create valuable content.
  • High ROI where well designed data models can be deployed with a common metadata layer to a variety of users and use cases.
  • High ROI in an environment that includes a variety of vendors and best of breed products within the overall platform
Read full review
Oracle
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment