JobAdder vs. PageUp

I've already answered this question. JobAdder is easy to use, easy to configure, has great support, has a strong product roadmap, good partner integrations...really a top-notch platform.

Incentivized

I think it can be very helpful and generate great ROI if you are a big company with a lot of recruitment processes running. It provides a centralized management view and a lot of resources/features. It can be too much and become hard to manage if you have spot and urgent demands, since it takes time to start getting results from the system, considering its learning curve.

Incentivized

• Flexible workflows
• Intuitive design
• Wealth of third-party integrations
• Easy-to-access support and knowledge hub
• Good onboarding process

Incentivized

• It has the ability to be easy to use and has multiple components that make it easy to quickly find employees.
• I really enjoy using PageUp because once you're trained in it, it's very easy to use.
• It's especially strong in being able to organize manage positions and you're able to put as much information as you need on the job descriptions.

Incentivized

• Hard to get in touch with technical support
• Has a price to it
• Hard to clear alerts

Incentivized

• At first reporting and analytics were a bit confusing, but then we got used to it.
• It would be great to have tools to make easier the deployment of simple and quick recruitment process, reducing the learning curve to use the product.
• A version in Portuguese would make everything easier for us.

Incentivized

Many of the products we have evaluated are not available on the list. We've looked at Mindscope Cura, we've used Mindscope (before Cura), we were long-time users of Sendouts (before Bullhorn acquisition), and we were on a product called Compas for a few years before moving to JobAdder. JobAdder excels in product features/capabilities, ease of use, and incredible support. We have been very pleased with our selection!

Incentivized

I have only used PageUp

Incentivized

• Improved time-to-hire drastically by isolating the process to one system
• Improved hiring manager involvement in process
• Improved allocation of tasks amongst recruitment team
• Improved reporting on recruitment activities which helped to monitor team workload

Incentivized

• Positive: centralized and more efficient management process
• Positive: cost saving when compared to other traditional recruitment processes
• Negative: learning curve and time to deploy, especially if users are not very experienced with recruitment processes

Incentivized