Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Score 1.4 out of 10
N/A
Cortex XSOAR, formerly Demisto and now from Palo Alto Networks since it was acquired in March 2019, provides orchestration to enable security teams to ingest alerts across sources and execute standardized, automatable playbooks for accelerated incident response. Its playbooks are powered by hundreds of integrations and thousands of security actions, striking the right balance between rapid machine execution and nuanced human oversight.N/A
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Trend Micro offers an end-to-end hosted security solution which they call the Worry-Free Business Security suite for midsize and larger enterprises, which provides a wide range of services such as endpoint protection, email encryption, general antivirus and threat detection and prevention, as well as protection of cloud applications as well, with no maintenance.N/A
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTrend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTrend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTrend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Features
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTrend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
-
Ratings
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
9.4
4 Ratings
10% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings9.43 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings9.93 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTrend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOAR
Score 8.3 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.7 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTrend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(8 ratings)
9.8
(10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTrend Micro Worry-Free Services Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Palo Alto Networks
XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
of a button.
●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.
Read full review
Trend Micro
With around 80 users and 150 devices (including 6 server instances), this solution served us very well, with instant admin notifications and scheduled overall reports. Detection appears extremely reliable, and the memory and CPU footprint of the service seemed less intrusive than Panda, which we had issues running on Terminal Services instances, as it seems to hog excessive memory allocation. Rollout was smooth and we never had an instance of a corrupt installation.
Read full review
Pros
Palo Alto Networks
  • Automation with immediate security responses.
  • Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
  • Analysis and reporting feature.
  • Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
  • Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
  • Centralized monitoring.
Read full review
Trend Micro
  • Hybrid deployment, can be on-prem or cloud specific, we are using cloud based
  • Central Control Manager capabilities to have control about what happens in the environment
  • No need to have internal infrastructure to host further than your workstations or terminals
  • No need to have dedicated team for security or endpoint protection
  • Maintenance and updates are available just as released, no need to take actions on that side
  • Great capabilities as a connected threat defense platform
  • Endpoint protection features and quality for SMBs
  • Cloud and collaboration platforms compatible including Office 365, Google Mail and On-Cloud Storage
Read full review
Cons
Palo Alto Networks
  • The XSOAR bot creates a lot of noise on the summary page of any XSOAR incident. Although the filter is available to reduce the view, by default this should not be visible cluttering the whole scenario.
  • The interface has too much data on a single pane. I would love to have many buttons to just click and do stuff.
  • Also, I would love to have search areas more interactive and easier to navigate.
Read full review
Trend Micro
  • It would be better if there were an unload password for each policy instead of one for the whole organization.
  • We have one app that gets blocked with no log of any reason why, there should be a better way to troubleshoot that other than just closing the AV every time. Allow listing has not worked in this case.
  • When something is blocked it should specify exactly which setting or feature blocked it to make it easier to use the allow list or adjust.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Palo Alto Networks
It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.
Read full review
Trend Micro
No answers on this topic
Usability
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Trend Micro
Installation and administration tools are fantastic. I found the endpoint policies to be not intuitive and clunky. The endpoint client was difficult to disable when trying to troubleshoot Apple issues and I often had to uninstall and then reinstall which was very time-consuming. Reporting is very useful and I was impressed with the reports I received.
Read full review
Support Rating
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Trend Micro
The few times I needed to contact support I was fully satisfied. They worked all the way through the issue, no matter how long it took, and made sure I had a permanent solution. I was pleased with the professionalism, courteousness, and knowledge of the product they were supporting.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Palo Alto Networks
It was much easier than we all anticipated.
Read full review
Trend Micro
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Palo Alto Networks
The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.
Read full review
Trend Micro
Avast was clunky, difficult to roll out, missed loads of malware on machines, and required that we purchase a separate license to install AV on our servers. Trend Micro could not have been any different. You just contact their sales department and get a demo, or even ask for a trial of sorts to test policy creations and client installation. You'll be obsessed with the whole process and the admin dashboard you have access to.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Palo Alto Networks
  • Demisto has Eased malware analysis and threat hunting
  • With Demisto, it is simple to create playbooks and scripts
  • This is helped automate policy configurations on our PA firewalls through Panorama
Read full review
Trend Micro
  • It has stopped several malicious items from getting into our system.
  • It's also saved money over our previous Anti-Virus solution (Kaspersky)
  • Ease of Setup/Use
Read full review
ScreenShots