Paradox Conversational ATS vs. Rchilli

While my company is not in the high volume hiring space, it appears to be built very effectively to support high volume hiring positions and companies, reducing recruiting efforts around the initial stages of the screening process. The paradox is good at quickly integrating into your Mail Server System (like Outlook) to get their scheduling product up quickly as a baseline.

Incentivized

This is a great tool if you need to imbed the functionality (as we have done). Perhaps not a well suited to standalone use.

• Parsing of Candidate Resumes with good accuracy
• Around 70 to 80 different Candidate Fields
• Supports Individual, Bulk Online and Offline Parsing

• UI - Their UI is very mobile-focused; we are not a mobile-first company when it comes to our candidate's experience. It would be great if the experience was just as seamless and welcoming for the desktop as it was for mobile.
• Adding interviewers is not intuitive; it usually is a pain point for new users.

Incentivized

• So far, we have nothing to complain about.

We recently evaluated Azure Cognitive AI Services. It was not economical and we were asked to partner with another partner of Microsoft for specific Resume Parsing Services. Looking at the cost benefits, efficiency of parsing and ease of use of RChilli, we decided to continue with our very good partner RChilli

• Using Rchilli saved us thousands of dollars in development costs and avoided on-going maintenance.
• Using their taxonomy's means we don't have to maintain our own, saving us time and subscription costs.