Apryse PDF SDK vs. UiPath Document Understanding

PDFTon is best suited for larger organizations in order to maximize the multiple features and functionality and to justify the cost. The users will need a programmer that can develop solutions to deploy using multiple programming languages. They need to be able to understand how the different types of code can interact. Small organizations would have a hard time justifying the cost and may not have the skill sets to deploy it easily.

Incentivized

Document digitization and classification phase is good in this DU. But sometimes for some documents, you need to work more time to get the expected result.

Incentivized

• Great customer support
• New releases with added features
• Very configurable

Incentivized

• Invoice Extraction
• Rescipt Extraction
• Template-based Data Extraction
• Handling Varied Document Formats
• Integration with OCR Technology
• Handling Unstructured Content

Incentivized

• Lowering the cost
• Remove evergreen clause from contract

Incentivized

• More stability required when processing High resolution Images
• More Inbuilt AI Modules support required
• Easier navigation

Incentivized

PDFTron was our first choice because it was the best solution we could find at the time. it was the most versatile and easiest for us to deploy mostly because of the great support they provided. I had the opportunity to meet with them prior to purchasing and they seemed like a company that would continue growth of the product and listen to their customers for improvements.

Incentivized

I opt [for] UiPath Document Understanding [because it] is [an] awesome performer.

Incentivized

• It has allows our organization to stay ahead of the competition.
• The demonstrations we perform for potential customer are very impressive
• Our customers appreciate the versatility of features

Incentivized

• data classification time is abit problem
• extraction sometimes not work correctly even if you points correct data

Incentivized