Peoplebox vs. Teamspective

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Peoplebox
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Peoplebox is an OKR, employee engagement, and performance management platform that helps HR & Strategy leaders like the Chief of Staff drive business results and build high-performing teams. Peoplebox enables team leaders to personalized talking points, collaborate on agenda and notes, record Meeting Notes, make it action-oriented, set Reminders, organize ideas, provide calendar Integration and 1: 1 culture tracking.
$5
per month per user
Teamspective
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Teamspective is a people intelligence and employee feedback solution that helps companies to build a thriving feedback culture and lead with a real-time picture of the state and direction of their organization. Most features work directly in Slack or MS Teams. Users can answer e.g. pulse surveys in under 30 seconds, without links or logins. The vendor states their solutions are most impactful together, but can be utilized separately as well: 1. Pulse Surveys:…
$4
per month per user
Pricing
PeopleboxTeamspective
Editions & Modules
Engagement
$5
per month per user
OKR + Performance
$7
per month per user
All in One
$10
per month per user
Custom
custom pricing
Personal feedback
$4
per month per user
Pulse survey
$4
per month per user
Pulse & Feedback
$6
per month per user
Pulse, Feedback & Evaluations
$8
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleboxTeamspective
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTeamspective also provide other consulting services to help users make the most of survey results as well as to develop the organization and feedback culture.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PeopleboxTeamspective
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
PeopleboxTeamspective
Small Businesses
15Five
15Five
Score 8.2 out of 10
Submittable
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bridge Learning Platform
Bridge Learning Platform
Score 9.9 out of 10
Bridge Learning Platform
Bridge Learning Platform
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Bridge Learning Platform
Bridge Learning Platform
Score 9.9 out of 10
Bridge Learning Platform
Bridge Learning Platform
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PeopleboxTeamspective
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(2 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
PeopleboxTeamspective
Likelihood to Recommend
Peoplebox
Peoplebox is well suited to assign goals and track outcomes when the teams are aligned well internally and the goals are well defined with quantitative outcomes. It has limitations when it comes to integrating Peoplebox with internal toolkits and collaboration tools like Asana, Slack, and others. However, it works well with Google sheets.
Read full review
Teamspective
I have also recommended Teamspective many times! I think it's the best choice for a modern organisation who wants to support its people to take responsibility for their learning & development and not just passively wait for managers to do that. Teamspective integrates very well with Slack, so I recommend it to everyone who wants to have the feedback tool as a part of their other tools that are already used daily by the employees.
Read full review
Pros
Peoplebox
  • Allows to easily monitor activities progress.
  • Helps in prioritizing tasks.
Read full review
Teamspective
  • Easy of use
  • In-depth analytics based not only on direct question to answer, but the broad analytics database in background that links the questions to scientifically studied relations to broader analytics. As an example the importance of feedback and its correlation to motivation and wellbeing
  • Ease of implementation
  • Constant development of the tool in collaboration with other customers and Teamspective
  • Customer support and customer relationship management by the whole Teamspective team from Founders to developers
Read full review
Cons
Peoplebox
  • Integrations with tools like slack and asana are tedious.
  • Goals are difficult to link across multiple people.
  • Quantitative progress has to be updated manually in absence of the right integrations.
Read full review
Teamspective
  • Performance evaluation feature that would match perfectly with project-based organisation needs (I think all feedback tools should improve in this!)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Peoplebox
No answers on this topic
Teamspective
tool has been shown to be exactly what we have wished for and the constant collaboration and development together with Teamspective and other customer community supports that we should and we are continuing the collaboration with them in the future as well
Read full review
Usability
Peoplebox
No answers on this topic
Teamspective
Teamspecitve does not need heavy support organisation and tool it self is very self guiding. We have only 2 main administrators for the tool and the need from these perosons is very minimal. Tool provides easy to use interface and one glance reports from team to company level in one page. Our survey reponse rates in whole company levels are constantly around 85-90%, so it gives good analytics on the current status in multiple areas.
Read full review
Support Rating
Peoplebox
No answers on this topic
Teamspective
Teamspective answers quickly and really puts an effort to fix a problem. There have been several requests for the product to support our use cases that Teamspective has made true.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Peoplebox
No answers on this topic
Teamspective
Involve key users from day one as in any implementation project. Describe the need, benefit and use cases for easier implementation. Communicate actively
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Peoplebox
Although both tasks allow monitoring team members' task progress and activity reporting, they are a bit different. It's hard to comp [are these two tools, although People soft was much easier for me to use (more intuitive) while I was a team member of a small team.
Read full review
Teamspective
We did a wide comparison and ended up using Teamspective as we felt that they are offering exactly those features we needed but nothing "extra," meaning we only pay for the things we need. Also, Teamspective seemed simple enough, and on the other hand, we appreciated their strong investments in developing the product based on customer feedback. The biggest differentiator to the average feedback tools is that Teamspective is not manager-led, so employees will become masters of their own development.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Peoplebox
  • It has made reviews very easy.
  • Organisation has clearly defined goals and tracking.
  • Goals and objectives are transparent and open for all to view and comment on- making us very collaborative and open in culture.
Read full review
Teamspective
  • Teamspective has helped in building our feedback culture, which is often mentioned by our employees as one of the positive things in the company.
  • Teamspective helps our people give professional-level feedback independently, effectively, and respectfully. Feedback skills are important for any professional today.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Peoplebox Screenshots

Screenshot of Peoplebox

Teamspective Screenshots

Screenshot of Understanding the organization – Discovers the real relationships behind the org chart, and understand how teams actually interact with each other.Screenshot of Shows who are the critical connectors between and within functions, and understand the demands imposed on individuals to untie bottlenecks and pre-empt burnout risk.Screenshot of Answer smart pulse surveys directly in Slack or MS teams (in under 30 seconds).Screenshot of Actionable real-time people insights – Pulse results are automatically visualized and areas warranting attention are highlighted based on trends and comparisons to benchmark values.Screenshot of Teams get access to their own reports, facilitating team-driven discussions with our guidance. Pulse results can be compared by e.g. themes or teams.Screenshot of Individuals are automatically reminded to request feedback from relevant people. The interface guides in formulating constructive feedback and praise. Works in web, Slack, and MS Teams.