PingOne from Ping Identity vs. SecurID

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT environments, it can be…
$20,000
per year
SecurID
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
SecurID, a company and solution suite from RSA, is an identity and access management suite supporting access management, authentication, and identity governance.
$2
per month per user
Pricing
PingOne from Ping IdentitySecurID
Editions & Modules
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
Cloud
$2
per year per user
Cloud Plus
$4
per year per user
Cloud Premier
$6
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySecurID
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PingOne from Ping IdentitySecurID
Considered Both Products
PingOne from Ping Identity

No answer on this topic

SecurID
Chose SecurID
RSA SecurID is in a different space than Okta and Ping Identity. In our experience RSA SecurID will protect on site networks and endpoints with RSA advanced authentication. They used two factor authentication to assure auditors and network admins that users that are logging in …
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
PingOne from Ping IdentitySecurID
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
PingOne from Ping Identity
6.5
7 Ratings
21% below category average
SecurID
8.7
5 Ratings
8% above category average
ID-Management Access Control8.85 Ratings8.64 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.97 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.97 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Password Management8.85 Ratings8.74 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning1.64 Ratings8.34 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation2.33 Ratings8.64 Ratings
ID Risk Management4.34 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PingOne from Ping IdentitySecurID
Small Businesses
Dashlane
Dashlane
Score 9.3 out of 10
Dashlane
Dashlane
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySecurID
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(8 ratings)
8.2
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
PingOne from Ping IdentitySecurID
Likelihood to Recommend
Ping Identity
Really like [this] solution, it fits our requirements 100%. There are unlimited possibilities to extend the product, either by creating additional adapters or selectors. We really like the policy management level in PingFederate. It's extremely helpful when we can specify customer journey per many different requirements like user location, application type etc. As well, both StepUp and TopDown authentication flows were implemented [easily].
Read full review
RSA Security
Easy to implement and support. Flexible platforms and user-friendly interface. Not a lot of customization is available to customers and response time of support could be better. There are now competing products that utilize new features like facial recognition. Using camera and fingerprint sensors are becoming standard in smartphones so RSA SecureID should offer those as options.
Read full review
Pros
Ping Identity
  • Based on open standards, we can use as much or as little of the Ping suite as we like, depending on which other technologies we've already implemented.
  • Continuous innovation and product enhancements have ensured their products continue to meet our rapidly evolving needs.
  • Ping Identity has been an outstanding partner, starting with the RFP process and continuing to this day, years after the sale. They are focused on our success at every level of the company and are highly responsive to our needs, issues, and product suggestions.
Read full review
RSA Security
  • RSA Authentication Manager is easy to deploy and configure.
  • It is a scalable solution meant for a large enterprise.
  • Some of the key features of RSA Authentication Manager where it particularly does well are provisioning, mapping, and logging.
  • It has a very nice console with good administrative and troubleshooting options.
  • Reliable security for VPN, applications, and wifi.
Read full review
Cons
Ping Identity
  • solution has some propriety solution which is hard to customize
  • doesn't support all workflow and hooks
  • solution has aged and not all configuration are supported
Read full review
RSA Security
  • Slow to provide updates to latest operating system versions.
  • While the GUI is clean and easy to use, it does look very dated.
  • There is not an option for a temporary code to log in. It would be nice for situations where you are at a remote site but don't have your device (laptop, phone, etc.) with you, as well as other situations.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Ping Identity
No answers on this topic
RSA Security
Long story short, does the job. Can use company credentials to setup and access the account for SecurID. Easy to setup and implement. Doesn't have a high learning curve.
Read full review
Usability
Ping Identity
Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access.
Read full review
RSA Security
Using it very frequently, it's important that its straight forward and I do not have to go through unnecessary hoops to achieve something seemingly simple. Can setup using the company credentials and do not have to setup up a separate account. Setup was fast and easy. GUI is very straight forward and quick.
Read full review
Support Rating
Ping Identity
Ping's support is willing and attentive, but if I am in a position to engage them I am often at a point where most of the usual support engineers would not be in a position to answer the questions I have. However, Ping has been more than willing to engage their product and development teams with our organization as we take advanced deployment and use case challenges to them.
Read full review
RSA Security
Their support for onboarding and set-up is quite good. The only issues we tend to have are obtaining new user devices. These need to be planned ahead of time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ping Identity
Two-way authentication and ease of use. I've used several applications that just email a link but never ask for a verification code. By entering the verification code you are sure that the site is safe, secured, and reliable. Using Ping, we can ensure no one other than you will access the application using your credential as you can log in only after you confirm using the verification code that you receive on your personal email or device.
Read full review
RSA Security
Overall MS AAD is good but we have had a few too many reliability issues with the product that have lead to enterprise authentication outages over the last year. The Senior executives have a preference on Securid to be more reliable than MS AAD. SecurID does a better job in Integration for legacy on-premise applications for instance.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ping Identity
  • it is positive with saving the cost
  • some drawback with aging solution
  • directory is solid and provide lots of cost saving
Read full review
RSA Security
  • Implementing RSA SecurID has allowed us to help our clients understand we are committed to compliance.
  • Implementing RSA SedcurID has, however, negatively impacted employee productivity. Employees need to be aware of the additional steps they need to take to authenticate to a protected system.
  • RSA SecurID has helped us with our compliance audits.
Read full review
ScreenShots