TrustRadius

Platform.sh vs. RubberDuck

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Platform.sh
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Platform.sh helps companies of all sizes, from SaaS entrepreneurs looking to build, run, and scale their websites and web applications.N/A
RubberDuck
Score 9.1 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
RubberDuck is a new website creation solution that aims to combine the ease of use and speedy setup of website builders with the scalability and content management features of CMS platforms. It is presented an ideal solution for a wide range of businesses, including service industries like construction, home services, legal, financial, and medical professionals, manufacturers, and non-profits. RubberDuck is designed to make building a website a joy, not a chore. Mission…
$19
per month per installation
Pricing
Platform.shRubberDuck
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Platform.shRubberDuck
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
Platform.shRubberDuck
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Platform.sh
9.3
1 Ratings
15% above category average
RubberDuck
-
Ratings
Scalability9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Platform.shRubberDuck
Small Businesses
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 8.9 out of 10
WebWave
WebWave
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
10Web
10Web
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bitrix24
Bitrix24
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Platform.shRubberDuck
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
Platform.shRubberDuck
Likelihood to Recommend
Platform.sh
In our organisation we are the only team that uses Platform.sh to host any site. This was a cost effective way for us as we were using Acquia Cloud earlier for these websites. We mostly use Platform.sh for those sites which are always in development as it is simpler and faster to handle these operations in Platform.sh. Then we do a lift and shift to Acquia as we move more towards the go live and post production maintenance side.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
RubberDuck
Build a showcase website quickly with intuitive themes at a very affordable price, and most importantly, achieve performance and TTFB that rivals the competition.
EF
Eric Fillion
Président
Read full review
Pros
Platform.sh
  • As this is a PaaS it mitigates the complexities of a Cloud infrastructure like Acquia
  • We are easily able to integrate our sites with different technologies like Python and Rest
  • Helps us in providing Continuous Development cloud deployment hosting solution
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
RubberDuck
  • Customer service
  • Easy use models
  • Efficacity
Melanie Gauthier | TrustRadius Reviewer
Melanie Gauthier
Coach experte comportement humain
Read full review
Cons
Platform.sh
  • Platform.sh is not for beginners in my opinion. It has a good amount of learning curve in my opinion.
  • As this is a PaaS, teams habituated with cloud infrastructure may miss the server side support from their cloud teams. I believe you will have to work on server bugs more on your own.
  • During normal maintenance periods, integrations may fail if you are working on your sites in that time, in my experience.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
RubberDuck
  • I am 100% satisfied
Frederic Aubry | TrustRadius Reviewer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Platform.sh
In our team we use Platform.sh mostly while sites are in developmental phase. Then we do a lift and shift to either Acquia or AWS depending on the type of sites we have. Platform.sh is really cost effective and more fluid in terms of Continuous Development hence the usage. After said development is done, we generally lift and shift to Acquia for more content heavy sites and to AWS for more transaction oriented sites.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
RubberDuck
Quick and simple to use. In my opinion, anyone can deploy a website with any hassle with RubberDuck
Alex Marchand, Adm.a | TrustRadius Reviewer
Alex Marchand, Adm.a
Client experience director
Read full review
Return on Investment
Platform.sh
  • Continuous development for sites in build has been fluid
  • Platform.sh is really cost effective when comparing to AWS or Acquia Cloud
  • On the other side, lack of server side support demands a big learning curve from its users in my opinion.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
RubberDuck
  • We save mainly time, lots of time !
Frederic Aubry | TrustRadius Reviewer
Read full review
ScreenShots

Platform.sh Screenshots

Screenshot of

RubberDuck Screenshots

Screenshot of Page builder