PowerProtect DD Series vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PowerProtect DD Series
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
PowerProtect DD (a next-generation appliance replacing Dell EMC Data Domain) is a suite of hardware appliances used for data protection, backup, storage and deduplication. PowerProtect appliance offerings are cloud-enabled and vary by organization size, capable of supporting small business and enterprises. PowerProtect appliances are separated into two categories: entry-level to midrange, and enterprise. Entry-Level to Midrange Backup Appliances PowerProtect…N/A
Veritas Enterprise Vault
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Veritas Enterprise Vault is a file archiving option.N/A
Pricing
PowerProtect DD SeriesVeritas Enterprise Vault
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PowerProtect DD SeriesVeritas Enterprise Vault
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PowerProtect DD SeriesVeritas Enterprise Vault
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
PowerProtect DD SeriesVeritas Enterprise Vault
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
PowerProtect DD Series
9.4
10 Ratings
11% above category average
Veritas Enterprise Vault
-
Ratings
Universal recovery9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification9.58 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection9.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations9.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification9.59 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard9.58 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption9.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PowerProtect DD SeriesVeritas Enterprise Vault
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PowerProtect DD SeriesVeritas Enterprise Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
7.5
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PowerProtect DD SeriesVeritas Enterprise Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
Dell Technologies
We have huge data coming in from different sources and also from multiple organizations in our Data centres. This data had multiple copies of the same data and was huge in size therefore, we wanted to have a solution in place which can help us with a good amount of deduplication at the deepest possible level to make sure that our ecosystem does not have multiple copies of the same data and is also efficient at the same time. Having said this, we wanted this solution to be secure and reliable since it had to be exposed to a huge critical set of data in the market. To add, backup and restoration was something that we were also keen on evaluating so that once we have efficient data within our system, the time it takes to backup and restoration also reduces. And all this was justified by this solution when we signed up with them. From the pricing perspective and the implementation side, the solution needs improvement to make it more efficient and user-friendly.
Read full review
Cohesity
I recommend Enterprise Vault, especially over native Exchange archiving when: 1. You have, or may need litigation holds and searches 2. There is a need to archive and set defined retention periods for Journaling 3. You have lots of duplicate large emails that you want to get deduplication of 4. You need/ want to be able to search attachment in addition to emails 5. You want or need Litigation searches or archive retention to be handled by a team separate from your Email team
Read full review
Pros
Dell Technologies
  • It writes backups quickly. DDBoost add-on is very useful as well for improving backup speeds.
  • DD is very efficient in its use of capacity. It dedupes and compresses very well.
  • It spans to large capacity amounts.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • EV FSA had 2 stubbing options. We ended up using the IE shortcut as the stub replacement on the file system. In the DFS environment using DFSR the IE shortcuts allowed us to quickly and easily archive the data while allowing users to still access their data via the web or stub format. We were also able to exclude certain folders from archiving like the dfsrprivate folder. The newer versions of EV 11 and up have a better user interface to access this content from the web.
  • EV SharePoint implementation was pretty simple for us. Document Library archiving was pretty seamless. Archiving the different versions in sharepoint also helped further reduce total cost of storage.
  • EV Exchange was a good addition to our archiving portfolio. In our case we did not use the stubbing mechanism. Instead, we used the vault cache methodology. We had the option to pull down the full archive versus just the header information. The concern at the time was how quickly we could update the vault cache on the client. We ended up scaling out our EV environment to ensure the push of data could get to all our clients since we were in the middle of a notes to exchange migration. Overall I was impressed with Vault Cache and its capabilities. I also liked the ability to manage the Vault Cache and perform resets where necessary from the web browser interface.
  • We had EV FSA, SharePoint and Exchange as one single environment so we benefited from overall single instances of a file. Our backend systems were Netapp which we enabled deduplication for further improve storage savings. EV had a good SQL Reporting mechanism for Archiving and plenty of good canned reports.
  • Speed of archiving data was pretty fast.
Read full review
Cons
Dell Technologies
  • It can be expensive to implement, especially when used in conjunction with other applications/hardware such as Avamar.
  • The TCO can be high, especially when it needs its storage expanded.
  • Recovery speeds can be slow (compared to other solutions) for when recovery is time sensitive.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • The search function in the vault does not work very well.
  • Cost. If not planned diligently, it might add to the overall cost.
  • Not easy get a expert to address the issue fast.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Dell Technologies
DD has performed flawlessly for almost 10 years as our backup/recovery storage with offsite replication. Given its track record and great support from EMC, we're unlikely to look elsewhere any time soon.
Read full review
Cohesity
Symantec Enterprise is one of the best in the industry. We have already deployed their product to thousands of devices in the company and it would be a huge project to go through and change to an alternative product. We have also had much luck in dealing with their customer support. They have been very pleasant to deal with and their technical support has been quite knowledgeable in fixing our issues. This leaves us with very little reason to switch to a new product. We would have to see a significant amount of cost savings to switch to an alternative that offers all the same features and modules.
Read full review
Support Rating
Dell Technologies
Customer support has had some ups and downs here. We've had several issues with EMC support before and during the acquisition by Dell, but in the last 18 months support has been top notch. Quick and knowledgeable help is but a chat away, or they will call you back so you don't have to wait on hold. The team supporting us is responsive and is quick to assist with any request or issue.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Dell Technologies
We selected Data Domain due to its integration with our backup software. The Data Domain works well for what we need it to do.
Read full review
Cohesity
I haven't research any other software against Enterprise Vault. Office 365 automatically has archiving capabilities that we use in the cloud. In comparison to Office 365, I'd say Office 365 comes out on top. For one thing, we essentially don't have to manage it. It also seems to preform better. However, Enterprise Vault does very well if you have an on-premise email solution.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Dell Technologies
  • We were able to immediately discontinue our remote tape storage and TBU maintenance.
  • Reduced backup footprint in the data center.
  • It is costly to expand so buy it with a purpose.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • Helps on the data management life-cycle, moving unused data to cheaper storage and/or deleting it after some time, if required.
  • Also helps reducing the amount of data to be backed up on the active array.
Read full review
ScreenShots