ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Integration Service

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ProcessMaker
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
UiPath Integration Service
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
UiPath Integration Service (including technology from Cloud Elements, following UiPath's acquisition of the company in 2021) is a cloud API integration service that uses cooperative apps to connect an organization’s customers, partners and employees to the cloud services they use. The vendor says that by using their pre-built elements, their one-to-many approach connects applications with services, each through a single API. The organization’s app can instantly share data with other applications…N/A
Pricing
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Features
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
7.1
2 Ratings
12% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
API for custom integration7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
8.7
8 Ratings
9% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
Dashboards9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.2
8 Ratings
25% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
Process designer10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player8.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
8.4
2 Ratings
21% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
Business Process Modeling8.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Decision Modeling8.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Code-Based Automation8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
No-Code Automation8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(8 ratings)
8.6
(8 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
ProcessMaker Inc.
I loved it. You will not get an easier interface. You can develop workflow processes in a simple way, one which allows anyone to understand what you are trying to accomplish; however, you will get into some issues if your employees are scared of coding (when you get to the advanced features). For some, this will never be an issue as the knowledge you need is very basic. But for the school I was working with, it would have stopped them cold
Read full review
UiPath
Cloud Elements shines when you want to offer multiple options to the user on a type of system, such as supporting integration to CRM and wanting to offer Dynamics, Salesforce, and HubSpot on equal footing. If you only have a single integration with a single system, using Cloud Elements adds an unnecessary layer of abstraction.
Read full review
Pros
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • We can write PHP and Javascript code to handle the way the ProcessMaker does. It makes the ProcessMaker more flexible to meet our requests on our workflow.
  • The Processmaker provides a What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get flowchart design tool, we can draw our process very easy like Visio. And, We can use the flowchart to implement our workflow.
  • Also, the Dynaform, the electronic form function of Processmaker, is WYSIWYG form design tool, help us design forms participated in the process.
Read full review
UiPath
  • The API itself is very robust and easy to use, being a standard REST interface, standard HTTP response codes, well-packaged error messages, etc.
  • Their uptime is great! I think I've seen one (short) 5-minute' blip' the entire time we've been connected for any type of primary function.
  • Their support is top notch, they respond quickly, and the team that works with you is communicative and knowledgable.
Read full review
Cons
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • I am still not able to achieve complicated workflows. May be a developer to create a plugin is required.
  • The UI can be more attractive and colourful.
Read full review
UiPath
  • The only thing I can think of that they could improve is the quality of the assets they produce in the go-to-market process. This is a huge value add service, but the quality of what was produced was lower than what we would have produced internally. We spent more time going back and forth on the assets than it would have taken us to build them from scratch.
Read full review
Usability
ProcessMaker Inc.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Read full review
UiPath
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
ProcessMaker Inc.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
Read full review
UiPath
At the time we found Cloud Elements we found no other option that had a Unified API for cloud storage providers.
Read full review
Scalability
ProcessMaker Inc.
ProcessMaker has been able to create and host or various applications ,which are not only banking applications but our administrative applications as well. Just have a little challenge with integrations
Read full review
UiPath
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • This would have been the easiest program to implement. It would have been the quickest, and the one that most of the employees would have been able to master. That alone would have saved countless dollars in time investment.
  • Unfortunately, the environment doesn't support knowledge of coding. So, they would never be able to advance further than a certain degree before having to bring someone else in again. It would have saved money at first, but then would have ended up costing in the long run.
Read full review
UiPath
  • Not my area of expertise, but it made my job as an implementer much easier, especially after finishing the first integration.
Read full review
ScreenShots