Proposable vs. Responsive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Proposable
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Proposable is a sales proposal automation software solution offered by Proposable.
$19
per user/per month
Responsive
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Pricing
ProposableResponsive
Editions & Modules
Solo
$19
per user/per month
Team
$39
per user/per month
Enterprise
500+
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProposableResponsive
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
ProposableResponsive
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Proposable
7.8
3 Ratings
2% below category average
Responsive
7.7
17 Ratings
3% below category average
Proposal branding9.63 Ratings8.111 Ratings
Proposal templates8.53 Ratings5.614 Ratings
Proposal content library updates6.83 Ratings9.117 Ratings
Guided proposal creation5.82 Ratings8.19 Ratings
Searchable proposal database8.52 Ratings7.417 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Proposable
8.5
3 Ratings
5% above category average
Responsive
7.6
17 Ratings
6% below category average
RFP management & response10.01 Ratings8.217 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval9.12 Ratings8.216 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls7.33 Ratings9.116 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow8.53 Ratings6.211 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface7.72 Ratings6.316 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Proposable
7.7
3 Ratings
3% below category average
Responsive
8.1
13 Ratings
2% above category average
Proposal distribution6.63 Ratings8.110 Ratings
Interactive proposals9.43 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Proposal content tracking7.13 Ratings8.111 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ProposableResponsive
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 7.9 out of 10
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ProposableResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(3 ratings)
9.1
(18 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(16 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(16 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ProposableResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
Proposable
It is a great solution for small to medium-sized businesses. It is fairly customizable, and their support team has been great to work with us. They have helped us build some custom workflows to push a customer straight to a credit card page once they sign the proposal. This has really helped increase conversions when signing on a new customer.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Pros
Proposable
  • Very professional
  • Easy to navigate and use
  • Easy to edit and draw up new proposals
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP.
  • Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams.
  • Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition.
  • Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way.
Read full review
Cons
Proposable
  • The user interface is not intuitive and you'll need some time to understand where things are.
  • The structure of the proposals is sort of rigid and is difficult to create really beautiful documents (unless you are a genius designer).
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though
  • It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team
  • Really great new features, but expensive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Proposable
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
UI is friendly. Basically that alone is enough to renew because it is easy to use and gives accurate and fast results. The effective cross collaboration from other colleagues in my organization also makes for this tool to be extremely effective. Now that I understand how to use it, I can also easily train others on how to use it effectively.
Read full review
Support Rating
Proposable
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Proposable
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Proposable
I didn't choose Proposable over DocuSign, but I did use it at a previous company. Proposable is great for the smaller business and makes the creation and sending of agreements so easy! DocuSign was nice, but it was more complex in my experience and created a bottleneck for our sales team to get approval. I'm sure this was more of our own internal process, but between the two, Proposable was much faster to get what you needed in the form of an agreement. Less time freed up more time for selling!
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
RFPIO has outstanding, responsive, helpful customer support located in the US in Oregon. Support techs go the extra mile to help with basic issues and functionality training. Same-day support response and problem resolution are the norms. The system is also very user-friendly and very easy to navigate. Their Answer library is simple and far less complex than Qvidian/Inland. Little to no learning curve.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Proposable
  • It has left a great impression on current prospects and clients
  • It is the easiest way to draw up terms of an agreement
  • It is the best way to track who and when a prospect is viewing a proposal
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • I don't have access to the actual ROI data, but we would continue to invest in RFPIO as a company only if it were providing us with the results to win RFPs.
  • RFPIO makes the task of filling out RFP responses much faster for me.
  • RFPIO helps our team be able to divide out RFP chores easily, because we know we all have access to the same high-quality source for information.
Read full review
ScreenShots