Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. QAD Adaptive ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Pricing
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
11 Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
1 Ratings
32% above category average
Pay calculation9.010 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.09 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.09 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
16 Ratings
10% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
32% above category average
API for custom integration8.013 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Plug-ins8.015 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
21 Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Single sign-on capability9.015 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.021 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
18 Ratings
10% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
3 Ratings
36% above category average
Dashboards7.013 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Standard reports8.017 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Custom reports8.015 Ratings10.03 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
23 Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
Accounts payable7.022 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.020 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Global Financial Support8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
16 Ratings
1% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Inventory tracking7.016 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.012 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Location management10.014 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
17 Ratings
8% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Pricing8.016 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Order entry9.016 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Credit card processing6.88 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.113 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration9.08 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
21 Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting5.710 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
11 Ratings
5% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting5.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture6.88 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management6.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance6.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition7.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
6 Ratings
25% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
6 Ratings
2% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
13 Ratings
1% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared4.36 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management7.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
4 Ratings
15% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments7.23 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.83 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
10 Ratings
1% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management5.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
9 Ratings
7% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Production Process Design4.86 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Production Management4.38 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Configuration Management8.35 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Work Execution9.07 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.08 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
13 Ratings
14% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Forecasting5.410 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Inventory Planning8.013 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring8.08 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
7 Ratings
10% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Proposal Management8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.5 out of 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(25 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOneQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
Read full review
QAD
If you're setting up operations where you have to manage manufacturing builds from raw components to finished goods, I would recommend QAD. It's nice to have subassemblies part numbers for your builds and enter in the number of accepted quantities and rejects. QAD is very helpful if you have a lot of parts floating around. I would not buy QAD if you only have to manage less than ~20 parts... just use Excel.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • The new versions (9.2) of JDE has so much open functionality and really gives the user control over the screens and what they want to see. Love that the layout of the screen is really up to the user and what they want to see it along with freezing columns and creating favorites for way access.
  • It is so flexible with the system platforms that it can run on and so easy to customize since it supports so many databases.
  • It is intuitive and does not need to have a lot of training on how to use the software.
  • It's just a great ERP software and one of the better ones I've seen.
  • Oracle is FINALLY starting to listen to the users and SIGs and putting enhancements into the system which makes life easier for us business users.
Read full review
QAD
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • The Configurable Network Language (CNC) is a proprietary protocol, and it can be difficult to source resources that understand this language well.
  • It has some inherent limitations with generating PDF or printable files. Most organizations use a third party platform like Creat!form or Bottomline to solve this.
  • No built in credit card processing solution, and no plug-and-play eCommerce or webstore capabilities available.
Read full review
QAD
  • Needs more flexibility to add/configure new indexes (if using the Progress Database) as the current indexes on key tables like transaction history are not helpful
  • Need a better support system for the TMS/Precision interface
  • Need better KnowledgeBase articles to understand the innerds of Pricing functionality
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Oracle
No answers on this topic
QAD
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
great design and continuous improvements
Read full review
QAD
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
Read full review
QAD
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's advantage is significant cost savings and operational improvements when you run Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne in the Oracle Cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers the only no-compromise enterprise cloud platform for moving Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, its associated database systems, an ecosystem of apps to the cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's One-Click Provisioning tool allows you to deploy Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne on the Oracle Cloud in hours, not days while maintaining the integrity of existing customized apps.
Read full review
QAD
  • It help us to reduce the inventories (FG and RAW)
  • It reduce the time to adjust to the constantly changing international customs laws
Read full review
ScreenShots