Tricentis qTest

Tricentis qTest

Tricentis qTest

51 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Tricentis qTest	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.	$1,200 per year per user

Pricing

Tricentis qTest

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Request Pricing

Community Pulse
	Tricentis qTest
Considered Both Products	Tricentis qTest Ketal Parikh Principal Consultant Chose Tricentis qTest As I am not the actual decision maker of which tool to purchase. I have always liked the Tricentis qTest tool. Decision has been made by the top management, The tool has proven is value and for the Same reason it is still being used. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Project Manager Chose Tricentis qTest Open option for automation testing & easy to set up. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Tricentis qTest Still evaluating. TestRail seems to be a far better solution but we need to solve migration issues. Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Tricentis qTest looking at the positive features like 3rd party integration, the Tricentis qTest stacks up along with providing the custom build and event driven workflows with open-source solutions (Azure, DevOps, Teams etc). Manages and schedule automated testing along with creating report … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose Tricentis qTest All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose Tricentis qTest Value for moneyBest in classAll the feature which other tool are havingBest defect management systemCollaboration can be done in the best manner Helpful? Mahathee Dandibhotla Project Lead Quality Chose Tricentis qTest Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows. Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements. Supports robust requirements traceability, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis is easy to use and user friendly. Less time consuming with lot of good utilities. And for better test management. qTest also stacks up better than the above tools due to its efficiency, test case interface and test execution interface. Excellent comments area and … Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Senior Software Engineer In Test Chose Tricentis qTest - It was not our decision to use qTest as a tool, as this was a management decision. - Since I have used many Test Management Tools I can compare for e.g The Reporting and Statistics in qTest is very impressive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qtest is well suited as it serves the purpose for both quality assurance and business management. It is very simple for non technical users to write test cases in free hand and they don’t have to bother about traceability as it is automatically handled by this … Incentivized Helpful? KUMAR PRANAY PATRA QA ENGINEER Chose Tricentis qTest I have worked on Jira, but i found it more difficult interface to handle. It was not user friendly. The defect management was also not impressive. qTest experience actually helped me to take decision while evaluating. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Tricentis qTest I'm not the decision maker, so I can't provide objective comparison criteria, but I can say that Tricentis QTest is a reliable tool for Test Management. Incentivized Helpful? EH Ed Hein Sr. Manager, Digital Product Excellence Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Tricentis qTest Didn’t have the same ease of use for us and didn’t integrate as well into our test process. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qTest provides a neater package, with easier test execution and better integration with our other tools. Incentivized Helpful? AT Adrian Tang Senior Manager, Software Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis qTest Prior to qTest, the teams were using TestLink. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Tricentis qTest The main tool we compared to Tricentis qTest Explorer was the "Steps Recorder" that comes with Windows. We selected Tricentis qTest Explorer because, at least at the time, Steps Recorder would sometimes skip recording arbitrary steps, which didn't meet our needs. Incentivized Helpful? Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Chose Tricentis qTest None of our previous tools we listed in the available drop-down options. We had previously used Spira Test and Xray as our test repositories. We are currently evaluating Test Rail, Zephyr, PractiTest, and others. From an organizational perspective, qTest is better than Xray as … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Tricentis qTest We felt like for the feature set and due to the fact it was mid-range on the cost, it was a good choice. It also has some other plugins which we plan to utilize at some point like Tosca. Incentivized Helpful? Carla Borges Consultor Tecnico - Java Developer Chose Tricentis qTest We selected QASymphony because even though all the testing software are Agile compatible test management tools that offer complete coverage of the whole process of quality control: requirements, testing and management of test cases, problem management and reports. It offers … Incentivized Helpful? Anvesh Malhotra Software Developer Chose Tricentis qTest Integrations with JIRA and insights are attractive. CI integration was built in-house. Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Test case Pro Case management Pro Jira integration
Top Cons	Minus Customer support Minus User friendly Minus Support portal

Features

Tricentis qTest

Test Management

Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
	Tricentis qTest 8.1 26 Ratings 1% above category average
Centralized test management	8.825 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules	7.722 Ratings
Map tests to user stories	7.68 Ratings
Test execution reporting	8.525 Ratings
Defect management	7.721 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Tricentis qTest
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 7.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Tricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend	8.1 (28 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	5.7 (2 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	1.0 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	5.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Tricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend	Tricentis The qTest is well-suited for organizations transitioning to Agile or DevOps frameworks. It Streamlines test management with real-time collaboration and integrates with popular CI/CD tools. It excels in complex, large-scale projects needing centralized test cases management, traceability, and detailed reporting. However, organizations on a tight budget might find it cost prohibitive compared to simpler, low-cost alternatives. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Tricentis Highly customizable: we were able to organize our test cases in unique ways that made our work easier. Connectivity with Jira: being able to pull requirements information in from Jira was a big point for us. Standalone tool: Being a standalone tool on a dedicated server, we were able to have access to our tests regardless of whether our Jira server was down. Incentivized KW Kagen Wilkinson Senior Quality Assurance Engineer Read full review
Cons	Tricentis In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve. Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended. Incentivized KUMAR PRANAY PATRA QA ENGINEER Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Tricentis This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon). Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Tricentis qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Support Rating	Tricentis The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Implementation Rating	Tricentis Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Tricentis Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows. Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements. Supports robust requirements traceability, ensuring comprehensive test coverage. Lastly management decisions too Incentivized Mahathee Dandibhotla Project Lead Quality Read full review
Return on Investment	Tricentis Better organization and centralization of test cases has led to more cohesive team collaboration Speed to delivery, deployments to production, are mostly maintained Performance issues have led to testing delays requiring the team to switch to other methods which contributed to QA bottleneck issues and sometimes even missed sprint commitments Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Tricentis qTest Screenshots