Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes vs. TEHTRIS XDR Platform

Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.

The primary reason for looking for this program was the accessibility that we had to find all the support functions. In later updates, I think that the UI UX was de-implemented making the search more difficult. I think it is necessary that the teams that use the product are well trained so that the UI UX is not a bother. 7.

Incentivized

• Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
• Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
• Built-in Security & compliance.

• Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
• Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
• LCM of ACM itself.

• CET business hours are the only time that the SOC is open to the public.
• A few difficulties in distributing data.
• Intuitive UX Dashboard.

Incentivized

I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.

• Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
• Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
• Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.

• Violations resolved in 100% which is incredible.
• Costs falling in the long run.
• I think it has increased the unity of the team due to the ease of understanding its tools.

Incentivized