Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Editions & Modules
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnsibleRed Hat JBoss EAP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Features
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
8.2
147 Ratings
2% above category average
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
-
Ratings
Infrastructure Automation8.8141 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Provisioning8.4138 Ratings00 Ratings
Parallel Execution8.5131 Ratings00 Ratings
Node Management8.5123 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Logging7.3135 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control7.7119 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
6.8
9 Ratings
16% below category average
IDE support00 Ratings6.09 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings5.09 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.8 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Automox
Automox
Score 8.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Automox
Automox
Score 8.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(171 ratings)
8.1
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(5 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(57 ratings)
8.5
(3 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(5 ratings)
8.7
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(5 ratings)
5.2
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(5 ratings)
8.5
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
Red Hat Ansible automates server management, configuration updates, and deployments across our server infrastructure, keeping everything consistent, reducing human error, and saving time. Also provides detailed reports on what is done and uses role-based access controls to keep systems secure by controlling who can make changes.
Read full review
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • It reduces custom scripting efforts because everything can be scripted in simple, human-readable YAML playbooks.
  • Not only servers, but also network devices, VMs, Containers, Kubernetes clusters, etc., can be automated via Ansible, showcasing its extensive list of supported devices.
  • It is agentless, which makes it lightweight and allows for easy integration into CI/CD and GitOps pipelines.
  • Many Tier-1 telcos use Ansible for Day 0/1/2 automation of RAN, transport, and core infrastructure (e.g., network function lifecycle management, NE configuration push, patching VNFs).
Read full review
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • I can't think of any right now because I've heard about the Lightspeed and I'm really excited about that. Ansible has been really solid for us. We haven't had any issues. Maybe the upgrade process, but other than that, as coming from a user, it's awesome.
  • Give out Lightspeed for free.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Difficult to replicate configuration outside of a container environment
  • Still requires quite a bit of knowledge of the CLI
  • Integration with deployment tools requires CLI knowledge
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
Even is if it's a great tool, we are looking to renew our licence for our production servers only. The product is very expensive to use, so we might look for a cheaper solution for our non-production servers. One of the solution we are looking, is AWX, free, and similar to AAP. This is be perfect for our non-production servers.
Read full review
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
Usability
Red Hat
It's overall pretty easy to use foe all the applications I've mentioned before: configuring hosts, installing packages through tools like apt, applying yaml, making changes across wide groups of hosts, etc. Its not a 10 because of the inconveinience of the yaml setup, and the time to write is not worth it for something applied one time to only a few hosts
Read full review
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
Read full review
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is lightweight and doesn't really consumes much physical resources. It's high performing and suites well for high transaction Java enterprise applications. The out of box performance settings are not really great and you will have to configure the settings to suite your environment to leverage it's full benefits.
Read full review
Support Rating
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.
Read full review
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • POSITIVE: currently used by the IT department and some others, but we want others to use it.
  • NEGATIVE: We need less technical output for the non-technical. It should be controllable or a setting within playbooks. We also need more graphical responses (non-technical).
  • POSITIVE: Always being updated and expanded (CaC, EDA, Policy as Code, execution environments, AI, etc..)
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
ScreenShots