Replicon Time & Attendance vs. Skedulo

This program is an easy program to roll out to employees as it is very user friendly. If you are a larger company, this will definitely eliminate questions or concern from employees who fear they may not be able to use the program

Incentivized

Skedulo fits our needs for scheduling and uploading documentation for our medical research studies. Our phlebotomists are able to accept and decline jobs based on their availability and are able to give a decline reason. This is invaluable to us as time is important, and getting these appointments scheduled is imperative.

Incentivized

• Time & Attedance
• Expenses

Incentivized

• Friendly UI
• Continuous Product Development
• Open Source APIs

Incentivized

• The process for adding my hours for the week has a few more steps than other systems I've used.

Incentivized

• Occasionally it will not locate an available consultant because they put their block in on top of a previous appointment -- overlapping causes issues
• Fix it so the human errors of us inputting blocks is not so "perfect"

Incentivized

We selected Replicon at the time because Replicon fit our business model. As we grew, we believe we outgrew Replicon, as we needed software that had more functionality.

Incentivized

We actually use Skedulo as our only dispatching appointment program. Salesforce is not like Skedulo, but we use them together daily to ensure on-time specimen draws, delivery, and payout for all visits completed. Skedulo is very easy to interface with other programs.

Incentivized

• Time - often we have to enlist the help of other departments to go through and make changes to employees profiles once they are loaded.
• The program as worked well with our HRIS system.

Incentivized

• Lengthy implementation window due to high degree of change management
• FTE efficiencies not yet fully realized; assumed higher levels of automation
• Enable customer innovation and new Self Serve booking capability

Incentivized