RSA Archer is fantastic at cataloguing, personalizing assessments, raw reporting, and capacity to add custom fields. It is a little clunky around adding contextual information to notifications, peeking into data before attempting to load pages, quick navigation or determining linked (or sub-linked) relationships. These are all concerns that can either be worked around with an appropriate data scheme or with careful administration of the sub-routines.
Wolters Kluwer OneSumX is a perfect fit for almost all financial risk management needs. More to running financial risk analytics to help you keep an eye out on any possible financial risk, it offers outstanding functionalities in entire business regulatory analytics and reporting to help you run your business within its regulatory compliance.
Integration capabilities to multiple enterprise systems
Control standards and Procedures to address multiple regulatory/authoritative sources, standards and frameworks enabling test once satisfy many requiremnts
Rapid application development and User friendly tool with configuration capability to customize easily without user requiring programming or coding skills
It is easy to run various scenario analyses and stress testing on various financial activities in order to get useful metrics about possible financial risks.
It allows one to easily and fast process even huge amounts of data thus saving time and resources spent performing these activities.
It is flexible and easy to customize in order to fit your working criteria so as to best meet your financial risk management needs.
It is easy to have a full review of the entire balance sheet for easy data modelling.
Good tool to get the information communicated, approval workflow, and easy to add new findings/questionnaires. Seems to be compatible with different browsers and little downtime. Only request for improvement is to add an export feature with fewer clicks. Maybe batch export.
Our RSA Archer team is dedicated to finding solutions for our organization. They haven't mentioned any issues with receiving support with deployment or bug fixes, and generally the platform is very dependable. They are always very excited about delivering a version upgrade and presenting any new features that provide more dashboards or chart types.
It has been roughly 5 years since I have seen Securevue, so a lot can change, but to me it felt like several products were purchased and an attempt was made to piece them all together into a single solution (and I believe that may have been true). It also required agents on endpoints which did not fit the model I believed customers were looking for. MetricStream appeared to be difficult to install as it took their own engineers some time to get it installed in my lab environment. I did not think their web interface was as intuitive as RSA Archer. Customization to the platform was possible to some degree, but required a lot more work and technical skills than required by Archer. I did like the landing page for MetricStream which called out the important action items for the current user, but Archer v6.X now has this feature.
Everything about Wolters Kluwer OneSumX stands out when compared to other similar products. Talk of its well-organized interface and dashboard, the number and quality of financial risk management features all the way to the quality of the support offered by the support team. Its ease of deployment is another standalone factor.
It has helped us to streamline our financial risk management experience such that we are able to detect possible financial risks in good time and deal with them accordingly.
It has helped us to generate accurate and transparent regulatory reports that
guides us in ensure regulatory compliance is met.
It has allowed us to run analyses on our financial processes based on different scenarios in order to detect possible financial risk threats.
