Ryte vs. The Search Monitor

Ryte offers APIs to integrate with a database or other APIs. Ryte suits well scenarios where Ryte is a part of a larger ecosystem. As a user, I appreciate the simplicity of the UI. Ryte can be a little bit slow on huge websites with complex architecture. It is better to think of an accurate approach rather than spamming reports.

Incentivized

It would be less appropriate for businesses that cannot afford its services. I believe that almost any company can benefit from this but it needs to make sense financially. It is really well suited for mid-large businesses who want to target consumers through search engines and wants to stay ahead of competitors and see what keyphrases and words that they are using to better suit your content.

Incentivized

• Great for managing risks related to SEO
• Helps in optimizing content on the site
• Easy to build up reports

Incentivized

• Competitors bidding against our keywords
• Threat analysis
• Automatially sending alerts if specific metrics change

Incentivized

• TF*IDF analysis could go more in the way how Seolyze.com is doing it

• Different types of alerts
• iPad better integration

Incentivized

Really easy to use

They are nice and quick.

Quick installation - no IT needed

WooRank is slightly ahead, but the integration with Google Analytics is a real advantage of the solution. The full access to all functionalities in the trail helps to appreciate Ryte. Both UIs are quite the same in terms of designs or user experience.

Incentivized

Search monitor gives better visibility on what competitors are doing for a bulk of keywords, while SEMRush lets you just see how strong the competition is for a specific domain/keyword.

Incentivized

• It can be hard to justify the costs Vs returns, specially if you have most of the data available via other tools

Incentivized

• Easier to target locally
• Violations have been easy to submit taking less time away from the team
• Was able to increase SEO

Incentivized