SAP Ariba vs. Tradogram

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAP Ariba
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
SAP Ariba provides technology offering guided buying and spot buy, plus supplier and catalog enablement, and integration with Ariba Network – which the vendor states is more than 4.6 million connected companies strong and growing.N/A
Tradogram
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Tradogram headquartered in Ottawa offers their cloud-based procurement software, designed to provide complete spend control, purchase order management, and more at an affordable rate.N/A
Pricing
SAP AribaTradogram
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAP AribaTradogram
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAP AribaTradogram
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
SAP AribaTradogram
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Esker
Esker
Score 8.9 out of 10
Esker
Esker
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAP AribaTradogram
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(160 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.5
(111 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(22 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAP AribaTradogram
Likelihood to Recommend
SAP
Industries with stringent regulatory compliance requirements, such as healthcare and finance, benefit from SAP Ariba's robust features for maintaining compliance throughout the procurement process. The platform helps organizations adhere to industry-specific regulations and standards.Organizations seeking an end-to-end source-to-pay solution find SAP Ariba suitable. Its seamless integration of procurement processes, from sourcing to invoicing, simplifies workflows and improves overall operational efficiency.
Read full review
Tradogram
If your business is focused on one specific product or small in scope, Tradogram should be able to suit your needs. If you require simplistic reporting without in depth project codes and details, it does provide basic functionality that is very well suited for small enterprise. Companies that do all of their purchasing with POs will find it to be useful. If you are able to operate without needing it to plug back into a comprehensive ERP system, it should be sufficient.
Read full review
Pros
SAP
  • Its data driven user solution helps in gaining visibility into the landscape and thus helps in informed decision making
  • End to end procurement process under single platform and integration makes it easier
  • We have always experienced cost reduction using SAP ariba
Read full review
Tradogram
  • User-friendly
  • Helpful and attentive staff
  • Dashboard
  • Easy import/export
  • Customizable workflow
  • Project coding capabilities
Read full review
Cons
SAP
  • User Interface Complexity:
  • Some users find the user interface to be complex, particularly for new users. Simplifying the interface and providing more user-friendly navigation could enhance the overall user experience.
  • Customization Challenges:
  • Customizing certain aspects of the system, such as reports or templates, can be challenging. A more intuitive customization process would empower users to tailor the system to their specific needs more easily.
  • Learning Curve:
  • The platform has a steeper learning curve for some users, especially those less familiar with advanced procurement tools. Improved onboarding resources and training materials could help users get up to speed more quickly.
Read full review
Tradogram
  • Reporting is really rigid and not customizable (except at an additional fee)
  • The API is new and still requires significant work to connect back into our ERP
  • Non-PO invoicing is extremely basic and doesn't draw from existing features
  • Can take a lot of clicks to get through a task
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
SAP
Established product and we are now using it as a mean for our procurement transformation
Read full review
Tradogram
No answers on this topic
Usability
SAP
UI is good from tech perspective Customisations and personalisations are very intuitive and allows user to make the maximum usaage of the dashboard. Integrations with existing systems matters a lot for large enterprises. Training and support is very crucial. Mobile availability enhances the overall customer experience. Feedback is underrated but comapnies take it very seriously now a days.
Read full review
Tradogram
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
SAP
Customer support has always been top notch. From small configuration changes to overall process changes, support has the teammates in place with excellent knowledge and is able to provide solutions based on business challenges quickly. Their customer support through their Account teams continues to be hands on and very responsive to needs in a timely fashion.
Read full review
Tradogram
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
SAP
It improves over all vendor management system of an organization by providing less costly ways of procurement and making business simple. AribaSAP Ariba digitally transforms your supply chain, procurement and contract management process. acts as supply chain, procurement service to do business globally In today’s world, there is a need to control your supply chain and to collaborate with your suppliers in an efficient way. To enable healthy supply chain, you need to have suppliers with visibility to every part of procurement process so that they can maintain an efficient supply chain and help organizations to grow their and own business..
Read full review
Tradogram
We evaluated Procurify as part of our initial scope conversations. Ultimately, we felt that the price point was outside of what we could support and went with the lesser cost of Tradogram instead.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SAP
  • We saved nearly 10% of planned costs due to the large database of vendors we created within the company as a whole.
  • Saving in time due to shortening of procurement cycles. Procurement activities were never on the critical path and were accomplished with less Supply Chain resources than originally planned.
  • In the process we created a huge database of Vendors and Pricing which well be beneficial in our future projects.
  • It is an excellent tool and just what are business required and could afford.
Read full review
Tradogram
  • The product was priced very well as we made the transition from a homegrown internal system.
  • The need to pay to customize the system to do what we need it to do has been cumbersome.
  • The API connection back to our ERP system has not been optimal and has required us to engage with outside parties to assure that it is working properly.
Read full review
ScreenShots