SAP Build vs. TrueSight Orchestration

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAP Build
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Build is a low-code app development and automation suite used to visually create apps, automate end-to-end processes, and design business sites with drag-and-drop simplicity. The solution includes a library with more than 300+ prebuilt business content and connectors for SAP and non-SAP systems to help users get started.
$1.82
per month per user
TrueSight Orchestration
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
TrueSight Orchestration (formerly Atrium Orchestrator) is datacenter automation software from BMC.N/A
Pricing
SAP BuildTrueSight Orchestration
Editions & Modules
SAP Build Process Automation - Standard User
$1.82
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Advanced User
$15
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Attended Automation
$534
per month
SAP Build Process Automation - Unattended Automation
$534
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAP BuildTrueSight Orchestration
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
SAP BuildTrueSight Orchestration
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
SAP Build
7.9
29 Ratings
8% below category average
TrueSight Orchestration
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.321 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces8.620 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security7.528 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management8.127 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability7.627 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability7.228 Ratings00 Ratings
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
SAP Build
-
Ratings
TrueSight Orchestration
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Multi-platform scheduling00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Central monitoring00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Logging00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Alerts and notifications00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Analysis and visualization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Application integration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SAP BuildTrueSight Orchestration
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.8 out of 10
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAP BuildTrueSight Orchestration
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(33 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(30 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAP BuildTrueSight Orchestration
Likelihood to Recommend
SAP
As mentioned, the integration between SAP Build Work Zone and SAP BPA, SAP S/4HANA, and Ariba was easy to follow once all requirements were met. However, there is not much information, or at least the SAP Documentation is not easy to follow to set up the right landscape that meets all the requirements; this was the case with the IAS and IPS configuration, where we needed the support of BTP Architects.
Read full review
BMC Software Inc.
Well Suited if running other BMC products Need well trained Level 2 & Level 3 Administration for day to day tasks
Read full review
Pros
SAP
  • Unattended Automation.
  • Attended automation.
  • Connecting to the backend SAP system (ECC or S/4).
  • Can also talk to non SAP world.
  • Doesn't require skills strictly pertaining to BPA. In fact, even a RPA developer can build logic.
Read full review
BMC Software Inc.
  • Ease of Integration with other BMC products like BMC BSA , BNA ,Remedy & ITSM
  • Technical Support is good
  • Good documentation & Community Support
  • Integration with third party apps is good
Read full review
Cons
SAP
  • Reusability of components in sap build apps.
  • Limited development platform support.
  • Desktop agent not available for MAC OS.
  • Offline mode.
  • Accessibility feature.
Read full review
BMC Software Inc.
  • Complex initial setup
  • Integration with Cloud is missing
  • UI is old & traditional & not user friendly
Read full review
Usability
SAP
The interface is very modern, web-based, no deep technical knowledge is required to use SAP Build Process Automation. It works with drag and drop, configuration and almost no coding is needed. Actually, we had to write code only for one specific small business logic. All the rest could be done in a no-code manner.
Read full review
BMC Software Inc.
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
SAP
There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.
Read full review
BMC Software Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
SAP
Bubble.io is more user-friendly in comparison with SAP AppGyver. The latter being practically a free tool provides enough functionality to achieve results though while Bubble.io doesn't let you export your projects without a paid subscription. Bubble.io has great initial tour and tutorial integrated into the platform that can be handy for any new beginner while SAP AppGyver can be a little overwhelming.
Read full review
BMC Software Inc.
We choose Atrium Orchestrator since we are using other BMC products in our environment & integration to those products is simple
Read full review
Return on Investment
SAP
  • Lower costs for development and automation
  • Very easy to use
  • Integrates existing applications with pre-built APIs, components, and templates for SAP and non-SAP applications
Read full review
BMC Software Inc.
  • Able to automate 50% of manual operations work
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Build Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Portfolio includes:
1- SAP Build Apps to create business application
2- SAP Build Process Automation to automate end to end business processes
3- SAP Build Work Zone to design and create business sites