Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. SAP NetWeaver Application Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
SAP NetWeaver AS
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSAP NetWeaver Application Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPSAP NetWeaver AS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSAP NetWeaver Application Server
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSAP NetWeaver Application Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
8.6
8 Ratings
7% above category average
SAP NetWeaver Application Server
8.3
4 Ratings
4% above category average
IDE support8.18 Ratings8.14 Ratings
Security management8.68 Ratings8.14 Ratings
Administration and management8.18 Ratings9.14 Ratings
Application server performance8.68 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Installation9.58 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance8.68 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSAP NetWeaver Application Server
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSAP NetWeaver Application Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(8 ratings)
8.4
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSAP NetWeaver Application Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
SAP
SAP NetWeaver is well suited for contract file storage and management. SAP NetWeaver is less appropriate for entering in time and attendance.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
SAP
  • Control of inventory
  • Organization of my clients
  • Complete reports
  • Autorization by level
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks.
  • JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc.
Read full review
SAP
  • sometimes in linux OS we face several issues during start and stop. Sometimes Zombie process still exists after clean shutdown that time we need to manually kill those processes otherwise it might not start properly. Here SAP can improve.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Usability
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Performance
Red Hat
Usually, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is good at performance and well suited for high traffic Java EE-based applications, but we have faced hard times performance tuning it for our specific needs. The product would be nicer if they would add a performance diagnostic and recommendations feature to it.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
SAP
I did not give SAP NetWeaver a 10, only because getting access to it initially can be tricky and sometimes it's very slow to load up.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
SAP
Most of the other applications only provide one business module to use, whereas SAP Netweaver Application server can cover all business areas. It provides both ABAP & Java features, meaning it can host Portal applications and be also used for having online transactions. The application codes are easily modifiable & can be made to fit user needs. This application is suited for all type of business demands
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Improved delivery timelines due to easy out of the box setup.
  • It is a cheap subscription-based/open-source Java EE-based application server. This reduces the overall cost of delivery.
Read full review
SAP
  • Great ROI. We need to invest in new developments, making it more functional for our business.
  • We have requests that couldn't be duplicated. Maybe we need to pay to fix that.
  • We have a lot of transactions and don't have anyone that can guide us to the ones that we need to improve our business.
Read full review
ScreenShots