Likelihood to Recommend I find HDP easy to use and solves most of the problems for people looking to manage their big data. Evaluating the Hortonworks Data Platform is easy as it is free to download and install in your cluster. Single node cluster available as Sandbox is also easy for POCs.
Read full review I spent more than 1 year with SAP Vora, SAP Datahub and SAP Leonardo with ML, iOt. I believe this product has potential but it is not easy to adopt. SAP has to keep in mind how open-source big data technologies are able to deliver quick results. I know SAP is stabilizing and fighting hard against many open source technologies, but it still has a long way to go there.
Read full review Pros It does a good job of packaging a lot of big data components into bundles and lets you use the ones you are interested in or need. It supports an extensive list of components which lets us solve many problems. It provides the ability to manage installations and maintenance using Apache Ambari. It helps us in using management packs to install/upgrade components easily. It also helps us add, remove components, add, remove hosts, perform upgrades in a convenient manner. It also provides alerts and notifications and monitors the environment. What they excel in is packaging open source components that are relevant and are useful to solve and complement each other as well as contribute to enhancing those components. They do a great job in the community to keep on top of what would be useful to users, fixing bugs and working with other companies and individuals to make the platform better. Read full review Modelling with SAP HANA and Hadoop Realtime Analysis using Vora and HANA as a Streaming engine Time series Analysis on large chunks of datasets Machine learning capabilities on Hadoop tables and spark contexts Read full review Cons Since it doesn't come with propriety tools for big data management, additional integration is need (for query handling, search, etc). It was very straightforward to store clinical data without relations, such as data from sensors of a medical device. But it has limitations when needed to combine the data with other clinical data in structured format (e.g. lab results, diagnosis). Overall look and feel of front-end management tools (e.g. monitoring) are not good. It is not bad but it doesn't look professional. Read full review Vora 2.0 in on premise scenarios could be improved, as adoption of the cloud is not an easy sell. Kubernetes and Docker integration need to be more seamless and quick to understand. If this is simplified, it will be easy to adopt Data hub orchestration and integrations could be simplified so that quick adoption within SAP BW, ECC, S4 HANa scenarios is possible. Read full review Implementation Rating Try not to change variable names.
Read full review Alternatives Considered We chose [Hortonworks Data Platform] because it's free and because [it] was an IBM partner, suggested as big data platform after biginsights platform.
You can install in more physical computer without high specs, then you can use it in order to learn how to deploy, configure a complete big data cluster.
We installed also in a cloud infrastructure of 5 virtual machine
Read full review Return on Investment It is difficult to have a negative impact, because the required investment is not that high. The big open community behind Hortonworks and related Apache Project makes it easy to put 'the wheel to meet the road' quite quickly. We have seen management meetings where the attendants were impressed by the results achieved with the datalake built on HDP. Read full review Negative impact would be Poc and RFI will need more time to adopt and decision making gets delayed Positive impact would be it's a great leap from SAP to adopt a Big data technologies and AI within cloud stream. But selling is going to take time. Read full review ScreenShots