ServiceNow Customer Service Management vs. SymphonyAI IT Service Management

It is well suited for medium to large companies that manage different teams and need to communicate constantly and track progress in a timely manner. It is less suited for small enterprises as it will overwhelm users with the features and functionalities embedded.

It is best for handling daily incidents and change records in the organization. And also provide features like which incident will have higher priority, and which have less and on the basis of that developer do their daily activities to resolve them. It also helps in managing our compliance change logs, which help the compliance team.

Incentivized

• We manage internal tickets through ServiceNow Customer Service Management. We raise tickets with IT and other team
• We manage our datapipe customers through ServiceNow Customer Service Management and it efficiently manages our customer interactions
• ServiceNow Customer Service Management helps us manage projects and tasks and keep a log of all our migration customers

Incentivized

• The Design Studio is an easy solution for L3 support professionals to improve existing workflows without technical support quickly.
• The process and UI are more seamless, robust, and attractive than existing solutions.
• The copilot AI addition has removed a lot of repetitive tasks and improved UX.

Incentivized

• Adding in additional chat features would be nice
• Viewing where you stand in priority
• Having a way to automate more of the processes

Incentivized

• Business Rule Designer - Since it has many automation we are unable to use it properly, because of BRD related jobs not getting executed
• Creation of sub tenant under tenant
• 5 why analysis method in the problem management can be designed more efficiently rather than its designed now

Incentivized

The overall satisfaction is great and it offers great features. By expanding to using AI feature of Symphony Summit, we look forward to automate even ticket tracking and ticket resolution. The support provided by the symphony SummitAI team is also robust compared to industry standards and the team also conducts regular reviews to find out any dissatisfaction from the clients.

Incentivized

Bottom line is that it does what you need it to do. We've been using Service Now as a ticket managing tool for a few years now. There's really not much it can't do when it comes to recording interactions. It has been nice using inventory tracking for software licenses and hardware as well.

Incentivized

Support has been very good. Any time there has been a real issue, the team has responded very quickly and identified the issue without a lot of repetitive questions that I've seen from other services. There is a great external community and internal knowledge base that covers pretty much anything you need.

Incentivized

Atlassian Jira lacks certain features and process which was delivered by ServiceNow Customer Service Management. Also, flexibility to customise was a point to select ServiceNow Customer Service Management tool. Cost which was high than Atlassian Jira compensated as it improved overall customer satisfaction and reduced resolution time by taking help of Knowledge base integration

Incentivized

The main reason for choosing Symphony Summit is the customization. We wanted to have a separate tool for our business unit. Compared to ServiceNow, which requires a license to approve a request, Symphony does not require a license. In addition, it is much easier to customize and scale.

Incentivized

• The negative impact for my team is the delay in team completing tickets but not a system issue.
• A positive impact for my team is we can easily view the status of tickets and the follow-up emails are beneficial to maintain records of tickets.
• Negative impact is that there is no user job aid or helpful tools for new users.

Incentivized

• When rolled out in its entirety, SymphonyAI is expected to directly reduce the CTC of technical user support by 40%.
• SymphonyAI has dramatically improved user experience, helping NPS levels cross over 60%.
• It has been instrumental in deploying workflows to production by more than 50%.

Incentivized