Engage121 vs. Smarsh Communications Intelligence Platform (with Actiance)

Who is using the platform? How many users might you have? How often would you be using the platform?

Incentivized

This appliance is well suited for organizations that have a need to monitor, moderate, or log social networking site use or the use of any website. It is a very solid tool for any information security department to have at their disposal.

Incentivized

• It does a good job of allowing for scheduling social media posts in advance.

Incentivized

• Discovery: It allows for easy discoveries by the compliance and cyber security departments.
• Ethical walls: This keeps certain departments from talking to each other.
• Very granular control. This is a big product meaning you can get very detailed with it.
• Once it's configured and running, we hardly ever have any issues.

Incentivized

• Uploading images after you start a post
• Analytics could be better

Incentivized

• Its configuration options were very large and required a good deal of time to learn all of the various settings.

Incentivized

We are choosing a new platform to go with. It is not my choice to leave Engage121, but it has the majority of the capabilities that we need to get things done. That said, if needed, I would choose to use it.

Incentivized

It's the only product at this time that meets all of our requirements.

Incentivized

Manalto is a platform that's identical to E121. One good thing about Manalto is the uploading images function. You can upload them anytime in the posting process

Incentivized

This was the only appliance of its kind that I have used. Other devices have different capabilities for web filtering such as the checkpoint firewalls, but none of them offered the overall solution that was deployed with this product at that time.

Incentivized

• Scheduling posts ahead

Incentivized

• Faster investigative work has led to increased employee efficiency when working on security investigations.

Incentivized