Lumesse (Discontinued) vs. Snagajob (Snag)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Lumesse was a talent management suite. Its core functionality is in recruiting and applicant tracking. Lumesse also offers other recruiting features, as well as onboarding and analytics capabilities. It was acquired by Saba and is no longer available.N/A
Snagajob
Score 8.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Snagajob, or Snag (including technology from PeopleMatter acquired June 2016) is a recruiting and job posting marketplace and platform, designed to fit the specific needs of service-industry brands. Users can find applicants, hire employees, train workers, schedule teams, and evaluate performance using the Snag / Snagajob platform.N/A
Pricing
Lumesse (Discontinued)Snagajob (Snag)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lumesse (Discontinued)Snagajob
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPeopleMatter is priced per location per month. The pricing is consistent for predictable budgeting and planning – as customers add additional locations, fees increase.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Lumesse (Discontinued)Snagajob (Snag)
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Lumesse (Discontinued)Snagajob (Snag)
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.0
2 Ratings
5% below category average
Snagajob (Snag)
-
Ratings
New hire portal7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.0
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Snagajob (Snag)
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Individual goal setting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance tracking7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.3
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Snagajob (Snag)
-
Ratings
Review status tracking7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
6.3
1 Ratings
13% below category average
Snagajob (Snag)
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Candidate ranking7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Candidate search5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.3
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Snagajob (Snag)
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Company Website Posting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customized Application Form8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resume Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Candidate Search5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Templates7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
User Permissions7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Lumesse (Discontinued)Snagajob (Snag)
Small Businesses
Paycor
Paycor
Score 7.3 out of 10
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Darwinbox
Darwinbox
Score 7.9 out of 10
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.5 out of 10
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Lumesse (Discontinued)Snagajob (Snag)
Likelihood to Recommend
6.7
(7 ratings)
10.0
(17 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.3
(5 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.7
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Lumesse (Discontinued)Snagajob (Snag)
Likelihood to Recommend
Discontinued Products
Lumesse is well suited for global companies, that are not too large and may get enough attention/support from other larger vendors.
Read full review
Snagajob
PeopleMatter is well suited for location based, hourly hiring, and I would highly recommend it for onboarding in any scenario. It is not well suited today for corporate or professional recruiting. The onboarding and compliance components serve all audiences very well.
Read full review
Pros
Discontinued Products
  • It has open text boxes to add notes, on the individual candidate home page. Which is helpful when making a quick look at an individual, these notes are very obvious.
  • It has a search function; however it lacks a wild card (*); so if a req or candidate are spelled differently or referred to differently, there is no way to find them
  • Its a simple, no frills lay out
Read full review
Snagajob
  • Simplifies the On-boarding process. Easy to find and sort through applicants based on the individual store needs. Ensures all onboarding is complete before moving forward with the new hire.
  • Integrations aid us in ensuring data flows through all systems based on our needs. Ensure the data is correct and duplicate entries no longer need to be made.
  • Customer service is quick to answer and solve your questions.
  • System is simple to use, our restaurant managers love the look and feel of the product.
Read full review
Cons
Discontinued Products
  • I have found the system to be very inconsistent and "buggy", for lack of a better term. Today I searched for an internal requisition number and the system could not find the data. I found it by scrolling through manually, and verified that I had entered the information precisely as it appeared. There seems to be no explanation as to why it could not locate this particular entry, but I have been able to use the function without a problem in other instances.
  • The navigation is not intuitive or user-friendly. It takes an exorbitant amount of clicks to accomplish a task. Each action is confusing and time-consuming.
  • The system requires a large amount of redundant information in order to enter a job and does not auto-populate. If I indicate a position is located in Chicago, it would logically follow that the state is "Illinois", the country is "United States", and the currency is "USD". I have to manually input these details in both the requisition as well as the separate job advertisement page.
  • Changes to the job requisition are not reflected in the job advertisement, as they are separate entities. If you need to make a change, you have to update the details twice.
Read full review
Snagajob
  • I wish PeopleMatter had an option to limit the visibility of attachments. The MyDocuments section allows one to upload important documents pertaining to the employee but because we use PeopleMatter like an online employee file... there are just some things the employee does not need to see.
  • PeopleMatter has an option to have the employer upload documents they wish new hires to view and sign before their first day (i.e. policies, handbooks, etc.). However, it would be nice to make certain documents available to the job that the document pertains to. For example, there is a delivery driver statement that should be reviewed and signed by delivery drivers but this document shows up for all the other positions too such as for servers, cooks, and bartenders who do not need to read or review this document.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Discontinued Products
This seems to work for us because of all the things we can do with the system (i.e. create all kinds of reports).
Read full review
Snagajob
I would definitely renew our use of PeopleMatter, because it would not be beneficial or cost effective for us to go back to doing it in house. If they are willing to listen to our needs and wants and update the program for the better on a regular basis why would you. I feel like we got in on the ground floor and we are evolving with them
Read full review
Usability
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Snagajob
It is extremely simple to use.
Read full review
Support Rating
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Snagajob
The account reps were easily reachable. I have made different types of recommendation, especially about the communication part. There are videos and a help center with fairly quick response times. I can easily update my career site, and they even have a text to hire option. I have not used that yet, but we are discussing it.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Snagajob
I would just say make sure you really think about how you are setting up the product. Are you using the roles correctly? Can we automate any processes
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Discontinued Products
Lumesse is an average to abover average ATS in my opinion. We work with Lumesse because they came to us with our new client. I don't have an overall issue with Lumesse like I do with some other ATS's.
Read full review
Snagajob
PeopleMatter is straight forward and easy to use - from the administrative side it is virtually an out of the box process. You plug in your locations, jobs, and availabilities, know your Onboarding steps, add a link to your website an go! It's not perfect but this was our first experience with any type of applicant tracking/onboarding/LMS - the reporting is more dynamic now than in the beginning and it is an evolution into what we truly can use!
Read full review
Return on Investment
Discontinued Products
  • Decreased employee efficiency -- There are so many steps to create an entry that our recruiters use the system as little as possible. We had hoped to use Lumesse for centralizing information and reporting, but have not been able to do so. Instead, each recruiter keeps a separate Excel sheet, defeating the purpose of having an ATS in the first place. We only use Lumesse to post to our website now. We are very disappointed.
Read full review
Snagajob
  • We have reduced the followups with hiring almost by 90%.
  • With reduced follow-ups, we don't have to have multiple people wasting their time on making sure that all hires have completed the required documentation.
  • We had zero failures in missing hiring documentation.
  • No more paper performance appraisals. Everything is online and easily trackable.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Snagajob Screenshots

Screenshot of Online Job ApplicationScreenshot of Six-Minute AssessmentScreenshot of Applicant Tracking and FilteringScreenshot of Training Course SetupScreenshot of Managing the ScheduleScreenshot of