Snagajob (Snag) vs. Textio

PeopleMatter is well suited for location based, hourly hiring, and I would highly recommend it for onboarding in any scenario. It is not well suited today for corporate or professional recruiting. The onboarding and compliance components serve all audiences very well.

Scenarios where Textio is well suited include tackling any organization's needs to go through their written material (in our case, job descriptions), identify potential bias and quickly know how to improve it. Identifying language patterns is Textio's forte, so I would say any language review effort could benefit from it.

Incentivized

• Simplifies the On-boarding process. Easy to find and sort through applicants based on the individual store needs. Ensures all onboarding is complete before moving forward with the new hire.
• Integrations aid us in ensuring data flows through all systems based on our needs. Ensure the data is correct and duplicate entries no longer need to be made.
• Customer service is quick to answer and solve your questions.
• System is simple to use, our restaurant managers love the look and feel of the product.

• Job posting review; providing an overall score and recommendations to refine your posting, remove gender bias, and improve the effectiveness
• Company website messaging
• Legal compliance

Incentivized

• I wish PeopleMatter had an option to limit the visibility of attachments. The MyDocuments section allows one to upload important documents pertaining to the employee but because we use PeopleMatter like an online employee file... there are just some things the employee does not need to see.
• PeopleMatter has an option to have the employer upload documents they wish new hires to view and sign before their first day (i.e. policies, handbooks, etc.). However, it would be nice to make certain documents available to the job that the document pertains to. For example, there is a delivery driver statement that should be reviewed and signed by delivery drivers but this document shows up for all the other positions too such as for servers, cooks, and bartenders who do not need to read or review this document.

• Price is rather high

Incentivized

I would definitely renew our use of PeopleMatter, because it would not be beneficial or cost effective for us to go back to doing it in house. If they are willing to listen to our needs and wants and update the program for the better on a regular basis why would you. I feel like we got in on the ground floor and we are evolving with them

It is extremely simple to use.

The account reps were easily reachable. I have made different types of recommendation, especially about the communication part. There are videos and a help center with fairly quick response times. I can easily update my career site, and they even have a text to hire option. I have not used that yet, but we are discussing it.

Incentivized

I would just say make sure you really think about how you are setting up the product. Are you using the roles correctly? Can we automate any processes

PeopleMatter is straight forward and easy to use - from the administrative side it is virtually an out of the box process. You plug in your locations, jobs, and availabilities, know your Onboarding steps, add a link to your website an go! It's not perfect but this was our first experience with any type of applicant tracking/onboarding/LMS - the reporting is more dynamic now than in the beginning and it is an evolution into what we truly can use!

We started by using free tools found online, but none could provide the same level of depth and insights that Textio provides

Incentivized

• We have reduced the followups with hiring almost by 90%.
• With reduced follow-ups, we don't have to have multiple people wasting their time on making sure that all hires have completed the required documentation.
• We had zero failures in missing hiring documentation.
• No more paper performance appraisals. Everything is online and easily trackable.

Incentivized

• A more targeted posting to our candidate pool

Incentivized