SocialPort vs. Thomson Reuters HighQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SocialPort
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
SocialPort is a social communication management system that allows organizations share content on social platforms, enabling them to grow relationships and exhibit thought leadership in their industry. rFactr also provides social content training that prepares each individual in a business to engage in conversations and share posts that have been optimized for social channels. rFactr empowers organizations to collaborate and promote social selling best practices through industry leading…N/A
HighQ
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
HighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
Pricing
SocialPortThomson Reuters HighQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SocialPortHighQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSocialPort provides complete feedback that allows individuals to track and manage everything from content creation to engagement.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SocialPortThomson Reuters HighQ
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
SocialPortThomson Reuters HighQ
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
SocialPort
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.2
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
SocialPort
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.6
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
SocialPort
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
9.4
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SocialPortThomson Reuters HighQ
Small Businesses
GetAccept
GetAccept
Score 7.5 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paperflite
Paperflite
Score 9.7 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Paperflite
Paperflite
Score 9.7 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SocialPortThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
SocialPortThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
rFactr
How does this platform improve the efficiency and productivity of my team? How much time should my team be spending in the platform each day? What is your history of deploying B2B sales technology and training? How does this integrate with my CRM?
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
Read full review
Pros
rFactr
  • Expertise, Strategy & Training - They are true experts and have years of B2B sales technology deployment and training to offer.
  • Content Syndication - By far the easiest and most efficient platform I've seen to share approved content controlled and at scale.
  • CRM Integration - Most of the other platforms we trialed had far less superior integrations with our CRM allowing us to close the loop.
  • More Leads - SocialPort allowed our team to identify and engage with leads and weed out useless activities.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
  • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
  • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
Read full review
Cons
rFactr
  • Auto-Posting - I'd like to see a way to syndicate certain content directly through our internal advocate's social channels.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
Read full review
Support Rating
rFactr
No answers on this topic
Thomson Reuters
The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
rFactr
No answers on this topic
Thomson Reuters
I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
rFactr
  • Increase in pipeline and opportunities created
  • Increase quota retirement
  • Decreased the average "time to close"
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
  • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
  • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SocialPort Screenshots

Screenshot of