Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. StormShield Endpoint Security

Check Point Endpoint Security is well suited for businesses where confidentiality must be maintained in order to mitigate risk and compromise of customer information

Incentivized

It is a very good device to use on a small and medium size company (0-400 users). However I wouldn't use it for very big companies.

Incentivized

• Identifies ransomware
• Low resource usage
• Self remediation

Incentivized

• Easy to manage on a daily basis
• It goes very deep into analyzing the trafic and the configuration is very thin.
• The first configuration is not so complex

Incentivized

• The prompts for one time logins are rather lengthy and it takes around five minutes to go through all of the authentication required. I believe this could be improved upon.

Incentivized

• Not everything is possible on the web administration page. We need to use the ssh console to do many things.
• The logs viewer is not as helpful as on other brands (like ASTARO, SOPHOS,...)

Incentivized

I found that Check Point identified more Ransomware attacks than Kaspersky.

Incentivized

Installation and day to day use is more friendly.

Incentivized

• It has enabled us to maintain privacy which has enhanced our highly rated brand standard. While basically it is a team member specific, behind the scenes program that protects systems from being used by unauthorized individuals, it contributes to the overall integrity of the organization which results in increased market share and return on investment for shareholders.

Incentivized

• It does the job very well once it is correctly configured. By that I mean, it is functioning with the least waste of time and effort for network administrators.
• If needed the support is efficient.

Incentivized