Teamwork.com vs. XWiki Collaboration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Teamwork.com
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Teamwork.com is a project management platform built specifically for client work. The platform helps users deliver work on time and on budget, eliminate client chaos, and understand profitability. Teamwork.com’s customers track and manage their projects with a suite of integrated solutions such as helpdesk, collaboration, knowledge sharing and customer relationship management add-ons, enabling Teamwork.com to be the ‘one-stop shop’ solution for business owners. Headquartered in Cork,…
$12.50
per user/per month
XWiki Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
XWiki Collaboration Suite (XCS) is a software solution that is built on top of the XWiki Enterprise Open Source project. According to the vendor, XCS tackles 2 main use cases: Information & Knowledge Management Collaborative Work It is available on premise or as SaaS and is packaged with XWiki SAS services. These services include: support, a yearly upgrade, initial setup and configuration.N/A
Pricing
Teamwork.comXWiki Collaboration Suite
Editions & Modules
Pro
$12.50
per user/per month
Premium
$22.50
per user/per month
Free Forever
Free
Up to 5 users
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Teamwork.comXWiki Collaboration Suite
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptional$4 seat
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Teamwork.comXWiki Collaboration Suite
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Teamwork.comXWiki Collaboration Suite
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Teamwork.com
4.6
78 Ratings
48% below category average
XWiki Collaboration Suite
8.0
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Task Management3.478 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Resource Management3.69 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts5.669 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling5.624 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.220 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.921 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.713 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology8.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management1.769 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration3.661 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access1.760 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking1.721 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management1.715 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management1.713 Ratings00 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Teamwork.com
1.7
31 Ratings
125% below category average
XWiki Collaboration Suite
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates1.611 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing1.711 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting1.713 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software1.726 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Teamwork.com
-
Ratings
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Notifications00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Teamwork.com
-
Ratings
XWiki Collaboration Suite
7.8
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Teamwork.comXWiki Collaboration Suite
Small Businesses
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 8.3 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Teamwork.comXWiki Collaboration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
3.0
(80 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(20 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(27 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Teamwork.comXWiki Collaboration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Teamwork
Teamwork is awesome for teams who need a flexible tool that supports all types of projects. Since it supports kanban it makes visualizing the work to be done and the work in progress very easy. The Gantt chart support is decent and helps to understand how a team is doing when it comes to getting work done in a given time frame. Teamwork isn't a great option for companies that have a bunch of projects going simultaneously due to the way Teamwork structures their billing based on a number of active projects.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
Read full review
Pros
Teamwork
  • I am a believer that simple and easy should be the key to create great opportunities.
  • Teamwork has helped me to turn simple task management into the execution of large, massive projects.
  • It has certainly worked great in helping to maintain workflow in my department.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
  • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
  • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
Read full review
Cons
Teamwork
  • Visualization needs to be improved, charts graphs are limited
  • Value stream mapping should be available to determine and prioritize the work.
  • Documentation should be available stepwise with export and printable facility.
  • It should be configurable like ERP with cross functionalities of different users, where users login, assign and approve the work, job or project details, where it should be collectively effected on a project.
  • Add many examples, little more AI, Machine learning required for suggestion and recommendation. It would be a plus point
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Teamwork
We are already at an annual contract, and have been for the past 5 years; so far the system has delivered, and our personal is already trained in it. A major overhaul of our entire infrastructure (as in moving everything to a single, unified platform) might change the current continuity of Teamwork Projects on our organization, but that's not feasible in the near future.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Usability
Teamwork
I give it a 9 out of 10, because there is a bit of a learning curve when you first start using Teamwork Projects because there is a lot to learn & recognize where to find it. They do offer a good range of tools that can be applied to every project - So say you're working on an internal project and don't need Milestones or Billing, you can shut those modules off. This can help simplify the interface for beginners. Once you've had a few days in Teamwork Projects, I think it's a 10/10 usability. It's very easy to accomplish your tasks and keep track of what you're managing.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Teamwork
We've been able to meet with the customer success team on multiple occasions to discuss the roadmap and learn about the company culture. Being based in Ireland, we occasionally have to wait until they wake up to get support requests handled in the states and larger conversations about big enhancement requests were politely collected but not followed up on
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Teamwork
I spoke about this quite a bit before, but as far as usability goes, Microsoft Projects is totally useless for me, so I avoid it at all costs. Basecamp was just a task management app and had very small feature set beyond that. We had to rig it to do other things for us, but it failed at that. Asana was a very nice app to trial, but it lacked many of the features that we were looking for.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
  • Fast app development framework with very rich API
  • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
Read full review
Return on Investment
Teamwork
  • Teamwork was a great starter into project management software. We were WAY more organized and efficient than we ever were with Trello boards and the PM software included with our accounting system.
  • Clients were mostly pleased with interacting with Teamwork, and appreciated the ability to track their comments and requests in one place.
  • Ultimately, we stopped using Teamwork after about 6 months because we need something more focused on web development projects specifically
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Teamwork.com Screenshots

Screenshot of Project's viewScreenshot of Task viewScreenshot of Board viewScreenshot of Project's tabScreenshot of Calendar view

XWiki Collaboration Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of XCS HomepageScreenshot of XCS AdminScreenshot of XCS for CollaborationScreenshot of XCS TourScreenshot of User Profile