Likelihood to Recommend Google Tag Manager is well suited when the marketer or marketing team does not work closely with the developers. In this scenario, it means that the marketer can deploy 3rd party tools such as live chat widgets, advertising pixels, and much more themselves in a timely manner. Google Tag Manager may be less relevant in an organization where the marketer is also the developer or has a strong development background, where they can implement the 3rd party tags directly on the site when they need. But even in this instance, there's still great benefit in using Google Tag Manager.
Read full review Are you currently running a lot of scripts on the website? Does it take a long time to get DevOps to implement and push scripts live? When a script is live and doesn't work, how long does it take to troubleshoot it and push the fix live? Do you frequently change or add scripts to the website? Are you looking to improve your page load speed? If any of these are current challenges, UberTags is well-suited to resolve those needs.
Read full review Pros Selecting elements on a site [object, class, cookie, etc] (to later fire an event, send some data, etc) is very easy with triggers. Want to add an event when someone clicks on a button? Super easy. It was many many DOM selectors and you can even add custom functions if you need to do something more specific In general, firing events in different circumstances is very easy mixing triggers and tags. You can track almost any element of the DOM and do whatever you want with it. Testing is a great functionality. Only you can see what's on the site and you can debug it easily by seeing which events or tags were triggered and all the DOM elements involved (and why they matched the trigger). Working in environments (staging, production) and versioning is easy to do, deploying changes in 2 clicks. Read full review Very simple and easy-to-use UI Compatible with just about any third-party script out there Excellent customer support Read full review Cons There are several good integrations, but there can always be more. Native tracking for call tracking solutions, analytics providers, non-Google advertisers would be top of my list. Documentation is just dreadful. Luckily there are some awesome folks out there doing crowdsourced tutorials (shout out to Simo Ahava) but by and large the Google Tag Manager instructions are worth what you pay for them. Read full review No support for Google and Bing Webmaster Tools verification codes Read full review Likelihood to Renew Google Tag Manager makes tracking traffic to our websites effortless, which enables our developers to focus on other tasks. Setting up a new instance takes only minutes and additional scripts can be added/modified without touching the source code of a site in production. This enables our marketing directors to coordinate tests and experiments with minimal effort.
Read full review The customer support is great. Any time I have a question that is not already answered by their extensive support libraries, their support team gets back to me quickly and always helps me accomplish what I'm trying to do You can't beat the price vs functionality The tool is frequently improved It's all-around the easiest tag management solution to use that I've seen. Read full review Usability Google Tag Manager is the definition of a learning curve. At the beginning, you can barely do the minimum and it can seem questionable as to why you would use it. However, as users begin to learn its offerings and see how it can do much more, they will have a moment where GTM becomes a tool that empowers their ability to track and efficiently collect data for important business questions.
Read full review Support Rating Read full review Online Training I thought there was a little bit too much emphasis on AdWords stuff, not enough on the generic application of GTM.
Read full review Implementation Rating Planning and communication will help greatly with an in-house implementation. If there are large teams, try to limit the number of people involved to 1-2 developers (back-end dev may be necessary depending on your platform), one analytics marketer and one project manager.
Read full review Alternatives Considered We moved to GTM from a standard
Google Analytics implementation. GTM is much more flexible and easier to make changes, especially as the changes relate to multiple sites and environments. While there is a learning curve when figuring out how to use GTM, I believe the change has been worth it because it helps us understand at a more fundamental level how our tracking works and gives us a lot more control over what we track and how.
Read full review UberTags is both very inexpensive and easy to use. One of the biggest challenges with Google Tag Manager is that it is very difficult to use. Implementation is very complex, there's not much automation to it, and it doesn't really save much time in the long-run. TagMan is a great alternative to UberTags, but I found that UberTags is much easier to use, provides the same functionality, and comes with a much lower price tag.
Read full review Return on Investment GTM is very useful to determine if a particular element on the site is useful (i.e. is it being watched, is it being clicked, does it help customers navigate through more pages). As an SEO person, I can use this information to decide what to optimize for but also to track progress and see improvements in engagement. With the use of Google Tag Manager, I was able to easily inject an A/B testing tool which lead to several improvements in lead generation. Read full review Improved workflow Quicker testing to production with scripts Improved page load speeds Read full review ScreenShots