IBM Video Streaming

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Video Streaming
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
IBM Video Streaming solutions are used to stream virtual events, executive town halls, video marketing product launches, and OTT streaming. According to IBM, the solution is built for privacy, reliability and scale, to optimize video quality, and powered by IBM Watson AI for video search and automated closed captioning. IBM Enterprise Video Streaming can power security-rich video communications ranging from employee town halls, to trainings and…N/A
Pricing
IBM Video Streaming
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Video Streaming
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsVideo Streaming edition is available for purchase via credit card online (or via IBM salesperson if needs exceed those outlined in the online plans). Enterprise Video Streaming edition must be purchased from an IBM salesperson.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Video Streaming
Considered Both Products
IBM Video Streaming
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Vimeo offers better tools for on-demand like chapters and marketing tools. But their live options are limited to event durations. YouTube can stream for longer durations but IBM 24/7 stream has been much more reliable and easy to use.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
We did experiment with other services when we started but quality, convenience, and pricing were the best with USTREAM.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
The features given by Ustream for broadcasting live events where not comparable to its competitors. The amount of information retrived about the audience is the real added value that was given by Ustream. Information on viewers is fundamental not only in the production of video …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
IBM just had more features than Livestream, Youtube Live, etc, particularly security and reporting. There was no other vendor we could trust with our clients' sensitive data. This was most important when creating internal educational, onboarding, or training content where …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
This platform was much more straight forward and did not require additional software vendors to implement.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
It's hard to compete against YouTube as it's a household name. While Ustream may not have been around for a long time, it's gain in popularity in such a short span is a testament to it's service and features. JPL must have been impressed with the product to choose Ustream for …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
The main reasons I would recommend Ustream over other competitors are: SSO integration, how accessible/responsive support is, the ease of use for the viewer, the consumption/seat model is easy to understand, server side encoding to multiple bitrates/qualities, ability to …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
When this project was evaluating streaming providers in 2013, Livestream was the closest to uStream in feature set. However, we found the packages that uStream provided were financially better considering the volume of customers who were going to stream our content. We also …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Ustream had more experience than many of their competitors, they were also able to beat them on price. I have looked at Livestream and they seem to be geared more towards broadcasters and news outlets. They offer easy to use and affordable cameras, revenue sharing ads and many …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Ustream Align is a much better product than Pro and Enterprise for different reasons. The pro version just doesn't do enough and The enterprise version lacked the ability to secure channels and videos the way that we have been able to using Ustream Align. All in all a much …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
For the service and because some of my clients need many streaming feeds that Facebook Live can't provide for them.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Because Ustream has become such a popular service, there are many more that have followed after it. You can find a variety of similar options that might have more customization or a lower price tag. However, the scalability and reputation this platform has achieved will keep my …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Ustream was hands down the best option. When we were doing our research, I was able to download the tool and immediately start streaming, it was incredibly intuitive. The other tools were much more complicated and difficult to use.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Ustream was one of few vendors who provided the ability to broadcast prerecorded events. Ease of use was a major factor in our purchasing decision.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Ustream is a great solution for companies to have a secure way to let their employees be up to date with important information regarding their employer. It is easy to use and share streams with any one with the required company credentials to be up to date and informed on the …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
IBM Cloud Video is the most professional and easiest to use out of all of them. While you certainly pay for these things, they are worth it if your company is serious about doing video streaming the right way.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
We were going to go with the "free"/unsupported route with YouTube Live, but Ustream has really allowed us to be more "hands off" with stability and security so that we can focus on the fun stuff like promotion.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
We have looked at a range of platforms - Livestream, Oolya, Brightcove, NeuLion, YouTube, Facebook etc., and all platforms have their pros and cons. The points raised earlier are the key changes that need to be made form our perspective to improve the platform. Offering direct …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
I do not believe we have used any other products.
Chose IBM Video Streaming
We continue to evaluate other services similar to Ustream. Some have cheaper prices, some allow for a larger social market audience at the time of the event, and some have similar ease of use. However, none have the same engineer supported service with the ease of use and turn …
Chose IBM Video Streaming
Before selecting Ustream (IBM Cloud Video) we used and researched Livestream and YouTube Live. We ultimately selected Ustream because of the channels vs. event based workflow. We appreciate having a dedicated link for employees to view live and pre-recorded content. YouTube …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Video Streaming
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
6.1
70 Ratings
16% below category average
Lead generation6.936 Ratings
Video personalization10.066 Ratings
eCommerce1.731 Ratings
Support for advertisements6.925 Ratings
Video SEO5.128 Ratings
Integration to Marketing Automation6.37 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
7.6
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Integration to Salesforce.com6.42 Ratings
Integration to LMS8.72 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
9.0
96 Ratings
3% above category average
Video access controls9.083 Ratings
User management9.079 Ratings
Video link sharing10.093 Ratings
Internal video9.076 Ratings
External video8.081 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
7.8
95 Ratings
7% below category average
Player customization6.179 Ratings
Embedded videos7.082 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls9.092 Ratings
Mobile compatibility9.087 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
8.2
87 Ratings
9% above category average
A/B testing5.812 Ratings
Streaming quality reports8.070 Ratings
Per viewer tracking9.078 Ratings
Per video tracking9.077 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard9.081 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
9.0
96 Ratings
6% above category average
On-Demand video9.067 Ratings
Live streaming9.095 Ratings
Impact of streaming on network9.079 Ratings
Video upload & format support9.081 Ratings
Video library / File management9.084 Ratings
Video portal9.065 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
9.0
64 Ratings
11% above category average
Audience polling9.037 Ratings
Audience Q&A / Live chat9.061 Ratings
Video comments9.050 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Video Streaming
Small Businesses
Wistia
Wistia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Panopto
Panopto
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Video Streaming
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(126 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.9
(8 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(62 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
8.3
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(9 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.1
(60 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.1
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.1
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(3 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.6
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Video Streaming
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
The teacher uses IBM Video Streaming to record and upload instructional videos on various subjects, such as math problem-solving techniques or grammar lessons. Students watch these videos at home as homework and then apply what they've learned in class through collaborative projects and hands-on activities. This approach allows the teacher to spend more time providing individual support where needed.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • It allows us to stream without special equipment. We mainly use our phones.
  • The quality of the videos is amazing and I love the fact that videos auto-save and you can download and edit them for later.
  • The program allows you to create playlists so that we can stream on our online channel 24/7
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Occasionally, we experience a form of static that lasts for about 1 to 2 minutes. It appears in the live stream and in the auto-recorded file, but not in the live worship assembly. It occurs roughly 1 in every 4 hours of webcast time. I wish there was a way to trace the source of that recurring static. The diagnostic tools could be more robust.
  • It would be nice if the chat room allowed a user photo/avatar for each user to personalize that a little more.
  • I have wished for a way that an admin could use a “laser pointer” on the video window to point out something on the feed that other live viewers could see.
  • It would be wonderful to have a mini-tutorial for viewers who are not technically savvy that would inform them of how to get to the site and explain how they can use the software. For example, how they can see and type in the chat room, how to maximize the screen and make it smaller. Some of our viewers are in nursing homes or otherwise limited in capability to learn to use this on their own.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Our organization depends heavily on this streaming service. Now that we have the option of allowing our clients to attend meetings virtually, we can never retract that option as so many of our clients love the flexibility. Also, we have no complaints with the service itself. It is reliable and dependable and any issues we have encountered have never been to blame on the service but rather our lack of knowledge of it or needing to update our embed code
Read full review
Usability
IBM
The user interface is pretty straightforward, but simply needs optimization. (Please hire a seasoned UX person to fix it.) However, all of the key features are there and understandable. It's a great platform overall, a bit expensive, and could use some more options for its viewing experience, and a better "smart" embedding window for mobile applications.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
Absolutely. We have never had an outage problem or any application errors that I have been privy to. We are duly notified generally in advance of outages or updates
Read full review
Performance
IBM
As we use it now, we are satisfied with the streaming performance. I cannot speak to integration yet as we have yet to engage in that but have plans to in the future
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
We funded 'white glove' service as our timelines were tight and our needs were well-defined. Tier 1 and Tier 2 support were able to help us get up and running in shorter order than we would have on our own. Documentation on the eCDN product had gaps, increasing the time to resolve and created concerns about success.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
Ustream is easy to implement. It takes any stream we have thrown its way and distributed it quickly and with quality. When talking to others that are pursuing live stream implementations, I often remind them that the technology used to distribute your live stream is less important than the quality of the content you are distributing. Taking care to use the right camera equipment, the proper encoder, and quality sound gear will result in a high-quality stream that will allow the strength of the Ustream CDN to shine.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Vimeo offers better tools for on-demand like chapters and marketing tools. But their live options are limited to event durations. YouTube can stream for longer durations but IBM 24/7 stream has been much more reliable and easy to use.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
IBM global network.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Our ROI is measured by the provision of ministry and satisfaction of our congregation. We are extremely pleased with our USTREAM and feel that it is a valuable asset to our church.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Video Streaming Screenshots

Screenshot of the viewer's portal experience (channel page).Screenshot of how the automatically generated closed captions can be edited if necessary.Screenshot of the Analytics Console.Screenshot of the Watson Media CMSScreenshot of the viewer's portal experience (channel page).