A bare-metal hypervisor that installs directly onto a physical server. With direct access to and control of underlying resources, VMware ESXi partitions hardware to consolidate applications and cut costs.
N/A
VMware vCenter
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
VMware vCenter is an advanced server management software that provides a centralized platform for controlling vSphere environments for visibility across hybrid clouds. VMware vCenter is no longer sold as a standalone product and is now available as a part of VMware Cloud Foundation.
At the time we did our comparison we found that VMware scaled much better than Hyper-V, lighter weight, and much more reliable. My recommendation if Hyper-V is needed for anything such as Windows containers, is to use nested virtualization and installing Windows Hyper-V within …
While Hyper-V also can work very well and can have licensing benefits, it does rely on Windows in order to run. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it can add another layer of potential failure and might not be running on as low of a level as ESXi does. The footprint for H…
When we bought VMware ESXi ten or so years ago, there weren't a lot of other competitors in the market. Nutanix didn't exist yet, and Hyper-V was in its infancy. Since then, Hyper-V has matured, and other products like Nutanix have come on the market as more fully developed …
I have used many hypervisors and VM platforms (KVM, OracleVM, HyperV, etc.) and ESXi is by far the most effective, full-featured, hypervisor and VM platform available. They have always been the leader and first to deliver their most important features (vMotion, svMotion, DRS, …
While Hyper-V has it's place, it is still in it's infancy in comparison to ESXi at this time. There are far too many "basic" features/functions that should be available that are not quite there yet. ESXi was selected due to it's now long time experience in the field of …
ESXi is the easiest to implement, almost every vendor supports a virtual appliance now. ESXi is also extremely reliable with an easy to follow licensing structure. This makes new deployments and consulting much more fluid and in turn easier to make recommendations as business …
VMware ESXi has been here since I joined the company. Before, I was working with Microsoft Hyper V 2012. But VMware ESXi is much more stable, more comfortable to administrate, and much faster.
VMware has been in the business a long time, and makes a very reliable virtualization platform. Hyper-V had matured exponentially, since it's been released and is a viable alternative to ESXi. However, it is not as reliable as ESXi at least at this time. ESXi also accommodates …
It's more expensive than Hyper-V but our vendors seem to know how to support EXSi better than Hyper-V. It's easy to add hosts and build out tons of VMs, provided you have the funding to do so. The support is good and seems consistently better than Microsoft's.
When I was evaluating it, Hyper-V was still relatively new and feature limited. However, now it makes sense for deployment in small all Windows environments and you get a lot for the price (free*). Still, for large deployments ESXi is more feature-rich and flexible.
After trying Hyper-V, Xen, Proxmox VE and more we ended up choosing to go with VMware ESXi due to the ease of use and administration for our consultants. This in turn keeps our clients happy by reducing costs and support times when needed. While Hyper-V came in close the extra …
I strongly prefer VMware over the others. The robust solution that VMware offers is far better, and easier to use. The smaller hypervisor footprint, and resource requirements far outdo the competition. The performance of the VMs in turn is also better compared to the …