Enghouse Vidyo vs. Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Enghouse Vidyo
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
From Enghouse Systems, Vidyo is a web conferencing platform that features video calling and instant chat capabilities. The platform integrates with most environments, networks, and devices.N/A
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Skype for Business was an online messaging and conferencing tool, now superseded by Microsoft Teams.N/A
Pricing
Enghouse VidyoSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Enghouse VidyoSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Enghouse VidyoSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Considered Both Products
Enghouse Vidyo
Chose Enghouse Vidyo
Vidyo was acquired for telemedicine utilization, but quickly found the benefits across the organization for every day business needs. The ability to setup and invite external users in has worked flawlessly. The ability to click a link, download the app, and enter a secure room …
Chose Enghouse Vidyo
Skype is good, but the servers are in the cloud. We have the Vidyo infrastructure on our site. Vidyo can be sold easily because we can directly manage the number of licenses on-premise, With Skype, we need to have a Microsoft subscription and some customers use Linux as their …
Chose Enghouse Vidyo
We selected Vidyo for its ability to integrate with other software used in the company and the ability to have multiple users without an additional investment. We could pair it with the conference hardware we already had installed at our conference rooms plus every user could …
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
We've used Lync (Skype for Businesses predecessor), WebEx, LogMeIn, Vidyo, to name a few. For what it's designed to do, Skype for Business has worked well. It's an intuitive tool that allows people who are not as tech savvy to easily use it.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Enghouse VidyoSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
9.8
9 Ratings
21% above category average
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
7.6
192 Ratings
5% below category average
High quality audio9.89 Ratings8.0188 Ratings
High quality video9.99 Ratings7.7183 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements9.77 Ratings6.6180 Ratings
Mobile support9.89 Ratings7.9144 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
7.8
9 Ratings
2% below category average
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.5
189 Ratings
7% above category average
Desktop sharing7.89 Ratings8.8189 Ratings
Whiteboards7.86 Ratings8.3119 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
7.8
9 Ratings
5% below category average
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
7.8
186 Ratings
5% below category average
Calendar integration9.67 Ratings8.0172 Ratings
Meeting initiation9.69 Ratings8.1180 Ratings
Integrates with social media5.04 Ratings7.882 Ratings
Record meetings / events5.04 Ratings7.6141 Ratings
Slideshows9.78 Ratings7.7113 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
6.9
8 Ratings
19% below category average
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.6
171 Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat9.68 Ratings9.2169 Ratings
Audience polling5.05 Ratings8.592 Ratings
Q&A6.05 Ratings8.192 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
8.9
8 Ratings
7% above category average
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.1
154 Ratings
3% below category average
User authentication9.88 Ratings8.2140 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions9.87 Ratings7.9146 Ratings
Confidential attendee list7.05 Ratings8.1108 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Enghouse VidyoSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Small Businesses
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.5 out of 10
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.5 out of 10
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Google Meet
Google Meet
Score 8.3 out of 10
Google Meet
Google Meet
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Enghouse VidyoSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(9 ratings)
8.6
(195 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
8.5
(40 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Enghouse VidyoSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
Enghouse
I've had HR professionals ask about using it for interviews. Gone are the days where we have to spend hundreds of dollars to fly candidates in or limit ourselves to phone interviews. Vidyo with it's high reliability has saved the organization thousands in travel costs with candidate recruitment. Business meetings that can often be troubling to get leaders and executive all in one room, Vidyo has functioned extraordinarily well in bringing in people from home, on the road, or the airport. Mobile capabilities are easy and fast. Quick daily calls and chats in the office are probably best suited for the free options out there as Vidyo is not a free service like others. Better yet general phone calls will suffice.
Read full review
Microsoft
Skype is useful for collaborations across distances, including work from home, as well as a more convenient way to communicate with a large group of people. Skype is also useful to communicate with specific parties quickly, rather than relying on cellular service in areas where not as available. Skype is less useful if the team does not use computers , tablets, smartphones, etc in daily workflow as it would rarely be used.
Read full review
Pros
Enghouse
  • I didn't have to sign up, I just need to log into the "room" I was supposed to, so unlike Skype or other instruments, I didn't need to spend time and create my own account.
  • To be honest, the largest online class I've attended had 10 people in it (besides the teacher), but it was a good quality connection.
  • I enjoyed the ability to ask questions or clarifications in the chat (without having to turn on my microphone, so that the teacher could answer the question when he/she finished the thought).
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Instant messaging to anyone who we know only by name/email. Even if they're offline, they get the message in missed convos and a notification automatically goes to them via Outlook mail. All conversations are saved and accessible via Outlook.
  • Video and voice calls are a norm in the WFH scenario, and an average employee has around 4-5 calls a day. Skype gives notifications for upcoming meetings, allows easy scheduling via outlook calendar, and its audio/video quality [is] reasonably good compared to the amount of data it consumes.
  • Status availabilities - in the WFH scenario, you could be off for lunch, out of office, busy, sharing screens - and might not want to be disturbed. Skype allows you to do that, and in case you're off, ensures that you know that you have missed messages.
  • Screen sharing - we have to share screens at least once or twice a day with a coworker when working on some issues/features, and Skype easily lets us do that. One of the best things about Skype is that the screen can be shared without being on a video/voice call - which is of immense advantage because oftentimes, you could prefer sharing the screen, while it [is] too noisy to talk.
Read full review
Cons
Enghouse
  • The design and the branding give little to be desired
  • Customer support is below average
  • The API must be rewritten and add more functions that are commonly requested.
  • Project codes are not well maintained and hard to find.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Probably the biggest area is the video element as it has historically struggled in this area.
  • The need to be forced to federate with another organisation by providing yours and enabling the other organisation settings is a bit tedious but once done, allows for simple collaboration between third-parties.
  • Functionality wise, as it's an older product and being superseded by MS Teams, it feels as if it's run its course but was very good for what it does/did at the time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The software is simple to install and configure. It is rather simple to explain for correct use. It is possible to profile users for the different functions offered. It is integrated quite completely with Outlook and with Active Directory security. It performs all communication functions well with one or more interlocutors and the possibility of granting control of your computer is convenient.
Read full review
Usability
Enghouse
Though not as widely used as Zoom or Google Hangouts, it is very competitive as far as features and usability
Read full review
Microsoft
Very easy to use. Even though Microsoft Teams has a lot of features and integrations, as a user I feel completely comfortable on finding what I need, getting information about the app extensions and using them. It's a very comprehensive tool, intuitive design and does not make me feel tired to be using it. I am glad with the current experience.
Read full review
Support Rating
Enghouse
We have an internal tech team dedicated to setup and troubleshooting of Vidyo. This makes it very easy, because we have access to our own employees for help. Rarely have I or anyone I work with had to escalate something to Vidyo themselves, and we're lucky to have the internal administrators that run the show. Almost like Vidyo is ours and ours alone.
Read full review
Microsoft
I have only had to reach out to the Support team at Skype for Business once with an issue, and I was pleasantly surprised and encouraged by the quickness and thoroughness of their response. The wait time was short and my question was dealt with politely and clearly, so I would say the support team has it together.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Enghouse
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Skpe for business is utilized company wide in regards to my company. Everyone not only uses it, but uses it often. It is an effective way of communicating. It also integrates very nicely with outlook and all conversation history is pushed to a folder within the outlook system. We also have it so that if someone misses a message, they are sent an email reminder saying that there is a message that went unread.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Enghouse
Vidyo gives all of the competitors a run for their money. Since it works seamlessly, is easy to use, and has a clean UI. Screenshare could benefit from some work, like the ability to share multiple screens from different users at the same time. The search function could be improved, but overall, it's a great software.
Read full review
Microsoft
For the below reason I will always choose this app over its competitors: Better audio and video quality, Little to no disconnections or freezing when on a call/video conference Integrates well with mailbox/ calendar/ one drive, and SharePoint is easy to use
Read full review
Return on Investment
Enghouse
  • It did help us reach the objective of education - after a while, everyone had a chance to connect and the quality of video/audio once you're in is great. It's just getting there that isn't up to par (but hopefully would be changed in next versions).
Read full review
Microsoft
  • We almost lost our biggest client because of the poor performance early on in our implementation...the online meetings were poor quality for audio and bandwidth refreshing
  • Many of the employees in our company disliked the quality so much, they started to sign up for free Cisco WebEx accounts to use instead
  • The majority of employees in our company lost trust in our CTO because of his decision to switch from Cisco WebEx to Skype for Business
Read full review
ScreenShots