Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Score 7.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
WSO2 says they have taken a fresh look at old-style, centralized ESB architectures, and designed their unique WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus from the ground up as the highest performance, lowest footprint, and most interoperable service oriented architecture (SOA) and integration middleware today. Additionally, the vendor says that by relying on their carbon technology the ESB is able to deliver a smooth start-to-finish project experience.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPWSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
8.6
8 Ratings
7% above category average
WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
-
Ratings
IDE support8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management8.68 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.68 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation9.58 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance8.68 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(8 ratings)
7.5
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(3 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(3 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
WSO2
WSO2 ESB is an awesome product for companies looking to venture into the world of SOA with an ESB. They have a lot of other products too that can work really well with their carbon infrastructure. The interface is simple for deploying and managing proxy services. You can also write custom modules within the ESB using Java with IDE like Eclipse
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
WSO2
  • One of the basic requirement of an ESB product is that it should be able to support transformation. WSO2 ESB provides support of XSLT, so you can transform your request to whatever format. Moreover, transformations like converting your xml payload into JSON and JSON payload to XML are out of the box available.
  • WSO2 ESB provides a scheduler feature, by which you can configure your own scheduler to call a proxy service at a particular time of day or or initiate sequence.
  • WSO2 ESB provides excellent error handling techniques, WSO2 ESB provides detailed error handling scenarios to tackle all the situations. WSO2 ESB also provides custom error handling by which you can make your own custom error message before sending it back to client.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks.
  • JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc.
Read full review
WSO2
  • While it's easy to configure for a quick start, it is not so easy to deploy by yourself in a complex production scenario.
  • Not very stable for production usage, we encountered several trivial bugs that make us believe that this product is still not widely adopted.
  • Lack of a built in mechanism for auto-restart in case of an application server crash.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
WSO2
No answers on this topic
Usability
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
WSO2
Compared to competitors the overall experience has been fine
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
WSO2
Lack of auto-restart built-in capabilities. In case of running out of memory there are no built-in methods to recover from a crash, just for example, Oracle WebLogic Node Manager.
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
Usually, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is good at performance and well suited for high traffic Java EE-based applications, but we have faced hard times performance tuning it for our specific needs. The product would be nicer if they would add a performance diagnostic and recommendations feature to it.
Read full review
WSO2
The product is performing well and consuming few resources
Read full review
Support Rating
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
WSO2
Our experience with the WSO2 support has beent satisfactory
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
WSO2
It's the only one truly open source and free.
Read full review
Scalability
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
WSO2
Adding a server node is really straightforward, there are just few point in the configuration files.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Improved delivery timelines due to easy out of the box setup.
  • It is a cheap subscription-based/open-source Java EE-based application server. This reduces the overall cost of delivery.
Read full review
WSO2
  • Very well documented tutorials and case studies makes it easy to learn.
  • It has a really supportive community
  • It is fast and it can easily handle 300 tps of average use on a VM with 4Gig RAM
Read full review
ScreenShots