Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Adobe Analytics

Adobe Analytics

Overview

What is Adobe Analytics?

Adobe acquired Omniture in 2009 and re-branded the platform as SiteCatalyst. It is now part of Adobe Marketing Cloud along with other products such as social marketing, test and targeting, and tag management. SiteCatalyst is one of the leading vendors in…

Read more
Recent Reviews

Adobe Analytics Review

8 out of 10
September 07, 2023
Incentivized
The main purpose of Adobe Analytics is how better you understand your customer and how better you provide your service to your customer. …
Continue reading

Adobe Analytics Review

10 out of 10
September 07, 2023
Incentivized
The company uses it to understand the behavior and the performance of our acquisition efforts. In my team, in experimentation, we use it …
Continue reading

Adobe Analytics Review

9 out of 10
September 06, 2023
Incentivized
I use Adobe Analytics to run all of our weekly performance reporting. We use Adobe Analytics to wire frame data feeds that will then pull …
Continue reading

Adobe Analytics Review

9 out of 10
September 06, 2023
Incentivized
I always start very broad. It's always performance-based, so overall visits, shop visits, conversion bookings, and then that goes down …
Continue reading

Adobe Analytics Review

8 out of 10
September 06, 2023
Incentivized
We have apps, we have websites, we have Adobe tagging on there, and we want to understand what our users are doing from an informational …
Continue reading

Adobe Analytics Review

8 out of 10
September 06, 2023
Incentivized
We do use Adobe Analytics to answer how the products are being used. Products meaning software, products on site, and apps and user …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

12 videos

User Review: Adobe Analytics Proves Profitable With It's Data Organization Tools
02:29
Adobe Analytics Provides Ease of Integration In Conjunction With Other Adobe Software: User Review
04:00
User Review: Adobe Analytics Is a Robust & Powerful Tool For Large Enterprise Data Pools
03:14
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is Adobe Analytics?

Adobe acquired Omniture in 2009 and re-branded the platform as SiteCatalyst. It is now part of Adobe Marketing Cloud along with other products such as social marketing, test and targeting, and tag management. SiteCatalyst is one of the leading vendors in the web analytics category and is…

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

148 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is Google Analytics?

Google Analytics is perhaps the best-known web analytics product and, as a free product, it has massive adoption. Although it lacks some enterprise-level features compared to its competitors in the space, the launch of the paid Google Analytics Premium edition seems likely to close the gap.

What is Heap?

Heap is a web analytics platform captures every user interaction on web iOS with no extra code. The tool allows you to track events and set up funnels to understand user flow and dropoff. It also provides visualization tools to track trends over time.

Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Adobe Analytics?

Adobe Analytics lets users mix, match, and analyze data throughout the customer journey. It supports web analytics, marketing analytics, attribution, and predictive analytics.

Adobe Analytics Video

Adobe Analytics Product Tour

Adobe Analytics Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Adobe acquired Omniture in 2009 and re-branded the platform as SiteCatalyst. It is now part of Adobe Marketing Cloud along with other products such as social marketing, test and targeting, and tag management. SiteCatalyst is one of the leading vendors in the web analytics category and is particularly strong in combining web analytics with other digital marketing capabilities like audience management and data management. Adobe Analytics also includes predictive marketing capabilities that help users find trends in customer behavior patterns leading up to conversion. According to the vendor, these insights can help predict which campaigns will be most successful.

Piano Analytics, Coremetrics / IBM Digital Analytics (discontinued), and Parse.ly are common alternatives for Adobe Analytics.

Reviewers rate Device and Browser Reporting highest, with a score of 9.3.

The most common users of Adobe Analytics are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(813)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I've used Adobe Analytics in various companies and in various capacities to evaluate traffic for websites, mobile apps, and even connected TVs and streaming device apps. It is the primary reporting tool for all the KPIs in our organization. This covers all visitors, page views, video, advertising, and other events across the entire portfolio of websites within my purview as a product manager. We also segment all the data by visitor source, campaigns, device, platform and a variety of other conversion factors.
  • Quick report creation with workspace
  • Comparison of metrics
  • Segment creation
  • Custom metric creation
  • visualization of data
  • Set up of new sites
  • Speed of the service overall
  • Technical support
In my experience, set up of a new website in Adobe Analytics from scratch is absolutely atrocious. It is not ready to roll out of the box, unlike other web analytics software.

Adobe Analytics requires careful planning before deploying. This often is in the form of a spreadsheet with multiple columns for the various variables and events to be tracked as well as the classification of the variable. This could be a simple metric or a "conversion variable" which is still a simple metric, but one that can be correlated to other ones and track revenue. Literally simple variables in Adobe cannot do that.

This leads to the duplicate creation of various variables. Granted, Adobe does provide support staff as part of the contract, but this type of software should include some sort of turnkey setup with general metrics beyond a simple page view. Lastly, the need to double up metrics for both standard and conversion metrics feels ludicrously unintuitive to me.
  • tracking web visitors
  • creating and using segments
  • data visualization
  • Understanding visitor behavior.
  • Understanding marketing channels.
  • Understanding conversions and non-conversions.
Adobe Analytics allows for the comparison of the same metric with and without various segments applied. Google Analytics is an all-or-nothing situation; either you apply a segment to metric or you do not. This makes it difficult for segment vs. non-segment and creating percentage metrics. In my opinion, this is the ONLY advantage Adobe Analytics has over Google Analytics.
Chartbeat is great for real-time metrics. Adobe is close, with about a 15-20 minute delay. Though often their servers are slow to collect and show all the data for several hours.
We have thousands of users that include multiple departments: product managers, engineers, marketing, audience development, customer service, business intelligence and a dedicated team for measurement operations.
This is interesting because it highly depends on the user. Our organization has a dedicated measurement operations team that supports how data is collected. This includes which metrics and user events get pushed to which variable and how those interact with privacy policies. The team also works directly with website engineers to assist with data layers, JavaScript and tag management deploys. Our business intelligence team creates data segments and reports based on visitor marketing/acquisition channels, device type and other user factors. This team is instrumental for assisting various audience acquisition groups (social media and SEO teams) as well as marketing and C-level executives.
  • Understanding user behavior
  • Measurement of visitors
  • Measurement of revenue
  • Understanding site performance and errors
  • Multiple reporting suites to segment properties, sub-properties and platforms
  • No current plans
Our organization is so large and Adobe Analytics is so vastly embedded into our product and our workflows, we will not be switching from Adobe Analytics for quite some time. In fact, we've switched some older websites from Google Analytics into Adobe during our last contract renewal.

This is part of the problem with analytics. Once you have a vast amount of data accumulated, it is more difficult to relinquish and export it to a new system
  • In-Person Training
I have gone through a 4-day "training" session. Most of of was simplified and not helpful. The entire content of the training could've been likely been covered in 8-10 hours. Most of the four days was spent with the presenter trying to upsell the attendees on additional features while promoting add-ons for Adobe Analytics features that aren't included in the base product.

I suggest the term "training presenter" because it seemed very clear he was a professional speaker. But he did not present a great grasp of what seemed like simple user questions to the point where he simply did not seem to be a user of the product. When anything was asked outside his script, he was not able to answer it and would have an "engineer" get back to us. The entire four days of training were highly disappointing.
Adobe products come at a price and so does their service. For their analytics product, the support people are more miss than hit. It seems that all their support people are trained to upsell you on something and barely understand the product. The initial setup engineers who do the variable spreadsheets are the only ones who truly seem to know the product best.
Once you get used to it, it's easier. The original reporting platform based on the older Omniture version still [seems] clunky and ugly. With the addition of Workspace, reports are quicker to create using the drag-and-drop interface, but you still have to wade through all the metrics and know what you're looking for.
  • Adding a metric to a report: Only in Workspace and only if you know the metric you want.
  • Applying a segment to a metric: Only in Workspace and only if you know the metric you want.
  • [In my opinion], initial set up is horrendous.
  • Editing an emailed report is hard to find.
My organization uses Adobe Analytics across a multitude of brand portfolios. Each brand has multiple websites, mobile apps and some even have connected TV apps/channels on Roku and similar devices. Adobe can handle the multitude of properties that have simple, small(ish) websites and the larger brand properties that include web, mobile and connected TVs/OTT devices.

Each of those larger brands has multiple categories and channels to keep track of. We can see the data by channel/device or aggregate all the data together. This gives our executive teams the full picture and the departmental teams the view they need to see their own performance.
Adobe Analytics is generally available. I've never personally experienced the servers down. Most data are typically available within 17-20 minutes of real-time. But more and more over the past several months, the data has been delayed almost two hours. On rare occasions, perhaps three or four times over the past few years, the previous day's data was not available by 9am the next morning. Several times per month, scheduled reports will not be generated or emailed.
Overall, Adobe's servers seem responsive. Like any large-scale SAS provider, they can have occasional slowdowns where, I presume, a node is not available and other servers get bogged down with the user load. I have noticed this with both large and small data sets and reports.

On that note, Adobe Analytics can take a long time to run reports and pull various data points, depending on the period of time, number of metrics and segments applied. As you create reports, particularly in Workspace, the data are pulled in real-time while you're creating the report. This can often cause issues while trying to drag more metrics into the interface when certain elements of a table are grayed out because data is being pulled in.The more data points and segments involved, the longer it takes to update. When you look at larger windows of time, it takes even longer. If one were to compare to Google Analytics or one of the open source products like Piwik or Motomo, Adobe seems much slower. However, Adobe also supports far more variables than other web analytics products.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Adobe Analytics to measure key website metrics. Insights from the metrics are shared across the company including marketing, finance and strategy. We are able to identify which channels and campaigns are more effective than others. Also we run multiple A/B tests on form designs and locations to optimize the website performance.
  • We setup very specific segments to figure out which customer segments are responding better for specific campaigns.
  • Adobe Analytics can track customers across multiple sites using customer IDs, which are very useful.
  • Its data visualization capacity is very strong.
  • There is no built-in bot traffic filtering functionality so we had to manually build a segment for that.
  • It would be nice if there is a dynamic alert for an unusual data patterns
Adobe Analytics is a wonderful site analytics solution for large enterprises with reliable tag management resource. If the tags are not well managed it would provide very little value. It would be good for companies with multiple websites to track and manage.
  • Adobe Analytics helps us to measure exact number of customer conversions on the website and calculate ROIs from the campaign
  • Adobe Analytics can easily identify which campaigns are more effective than other campaigns - which led to shut down ineffective campaigns
Adobe Analytics requires huge financial investments compared to other solutions but we believe Adobe Analytics is the best tool in the market
They have pretty solid support for enterprise users. They provided nice on-site training and it helped me a lot. Also they have great online and Youtube resource for product knowledge.
Adobe Analytics has quite advanced usability with end users in mind. It is very easy to use and learn even for the true new users. Also it uses color schemes very effectively. I like the usability of newer drag and drop dashboard.
Adobe Analytics team provides decent professional services, especially for product training. They provided on-site product training for my team and it helped us a lot. The trainer was quite knowledgeable.
Not really. Their pricing structure was quite straightforward (parallel to usage volume) so I was fine with it.
I rarely experience outage issues with Adobe Analytics. It was very dependable solution. They have some planned outages due to product upgrades and it was totally fine.
Adobe Analytics's performance was quite satisfactory. Even for very large volume of data, it works pretty fast and I can get the results I want within a few seconds. When you run the data for custom dates, it tends to slow down a bit.
Adobe Analytics is mostly used by Analytics group. Some of the business users with savvy digital skills are using it too.
3
Very strong understanding on Adobe Tagging would be required to support Adobe Analytics. Also it would require strong cross-functional collaboration skills between IT and business. Usually people with IT backgrounds are performing well on this job.
  • Digital Campaign Reporting
  • Website Behavior Analysis
  • Website Testing
  • Input for predictive modeling on business performances
  • Finding out patterns of bots
  • Digital Marketing Attribution
  • User Behavior Research for multiple customer segments
Very satisfied with the current functionality and Look forward to upcoming future AI functionality (Adobe Sensei). Also love the integration with other Adobe products such as Adobe Audience Manager.
No
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
  • Product Reputation
Adobe Analytics is the most robust Enterprise-level digital analytics solutions in the market. It is quite expensive, but we chose it because of its advanced functionality and usability.
If I had to do it again, I would still choose Adobe Analytics but may try to negotiate around account support.
  • Implemented in-house
No
Change management was a minor issue with the implementation
It was not a major issue for us. Our organization is already very flexible so we can adapt the change pretty well. Adobe Analytics implementation went as planned.
  • Budget issues
Give some slack in your implementation schedules. Make sure it works well as planned. You want to have right data in the long run.
  • Online training
  • in-person training
I had a chance to participate in the in-person training for our team. I learned new functionalities and it was quite satisfactory.
I took some of their Youtube training on Adobe Analytics. It helped me to learn things I did not know.
No
We don't have enough budget for premium support.
No
Adobe instructors visited my office and delivered a great session for Adobe Analytics users in our group. We learned a lot from the session.
  • Segmentation
  • Data Visualization
  • Importing data from another systems
Yes, but I don't use it
Adobe Analytics was being used across multiple teams and we did not have any scalability issues.
Nicholas Dragon | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
  • Provides highly detailed reports on very specific metrics.
  • Reports are very easy to share and understand.
  • Able to assign customizable measurement perimeters.
  • Identify poor performing web pages.
  • Track success of digital marketing campaigns.
  • Learning how to use SiteCatalyst is quite difficult.
  • Initial implementation of software is challenging.
  • Support is less than helpful in most cases.
Overall, SiteCatalyst is an amazing program. If you can get through the difficulties of implementation and learning how to effectively use the software, it can do great things for your company. Make sure to negotiate extensive in-person training and person-to-person support into your original terms.
  • We are able to track traffic coming into our websites based on traditional marketing devices such as billboards. This offers us the ability to calculate the ROI of a web URL, which has proven to be valuable.
Primarily, we compared SiteCatalyst with Google Analytics. We found that when using Google Analytics, Google retains ownership of the information gathered and generated by our website. Not owning our data made our organization uncomfortable, which is one of the main reasons we went with Adobe.
We are satisfied with the product performance and are not seeking alternative solutions. Once you learn how to use this software effectively, it becomes very valuable. You just have to struggle through the learning curve.
15
They represent marketing, public relations, IS&T, human resources, and our not-for-profit foundation offices.
2
They belong to our eBusiness team and are charged with managing our public facing websites.
  • Monitor and manage traffic on our public facing websites.
  • Track digital campaign performance.
  • Identify performance issues with individual web pages.
We implemented SiteCatalyst at Intermountain before I joined the organization and I am unaware of which analytics solution was in place prior to my hiring date.
  • Vendor implemented
  • Implemented in-house
Implementation was handled in-house with the assistance of Adobe.
Because we were not familiar with SiteCatalyst, we felt like implementation was poor. There were several specific details we were not aware of, which required additional support later on to correct. Overall, implementation of SiteCatalyst on a large scale is quite difficult for new users.
  • In-person training
  • Self-taught
It was a one-day training several years ago that cost the organization several thousand dollars. There were only about 10 people in the training class. Adobe tried to cram so much information into that one-day class that none of our users felt like they really learned anything helpful from the experience.
Follow-up training is too expensive.
If you don't have someone to help you learn this software, I would absolutely not recommend buying it. Without training, SiteCatalyst is entirely ineffective.
Customer service is always good, however, support assumes you are an expert user and struggles to communicate complex problems so a non-IT person can understand.
Again, learning how to use the system is difficult. It is nearly unusable if you haven't received training, and training from Adobe is EXTREMELY expensive.
I have never experienced downtime with this product.
I have never experienced any sort of problem with this products speed or throughput.
  • Not to my knowledge
I don't know
I don't have information about our terms.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
  • Supports custom implementations.
  • Intuitive reporting interface.
  • Ability to "slice and dice" data elements and metrics in multiple ways.
  • Legacy implementations (prior to tag management and context data variables/processing rules) can be difficult.
  • Inability to correlate "click tracking" with "page load tracking" data.
  • Dashboard reporting limited in the amount of data that can be displayed.
  • Report Builder Excel interface is clunky and limited in what it can do.
  • Formatting of reporting exported to Excel.
  • Ability to see user flows through processes.
I don't make this decision, so this is my estimation - Analytics meets most of our needs, and switching to another platform would not be technically feasible.
94
Analysts and business users.
3
  • Measurement and reporting of web traffic.
  • Implemented in-house
  • Don't know
I was not in the organization when the product was originally implemented. Currently, our implementations are done in-house.
The success of implementations depend primarily on the solution design, and also on the ability to work with developers to get the solution implemented correctly. This is not an aspect of the product per se.
  • Online training
  • In-person training
  • Self-taught
I was not in the organization when the product was onboarded, so I don't know what training was offered.
I was not in the organization when the product was onboarded, so I don't know what training was offered.
I was not in the organization when the product was onboarded, so I don't know what training was offered.
Analytics/SiteCatalyst is designed to enable extensive customization.
Customer service has always been the Achilles heel for this product. Support is often slow to respond, if at all. Account management has seemed to get better recently.
Intuitive interface, ease of changing metrics/dates, ease of extracting information
Rarely unavailable
Difficult to determine if rare slowness is Adobe-related or internet-related, but results display almost immediately almost always.
  • Data feeds into offline databases.
I was not in the organization when the product was purchased/onboarded.
I was not in the organization when the product was purchased/onboarded.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
  • Adobe SiteCatalyst does a good job at providing a platform for collecting website behavioral data. It has many variables that can be used and can be adapted to meet many business needs.
  • Adobe SiteCatalyst does not do a great job at tracking online marketing campaigns. It does not have great multi-visit campaign attribution or statistical modeling built-in
  • Adobe SiteCatalyst does not do well at providing segment comparisons, which require an add-on product (Adobe Discover).
  • Adobe SiteCatalyst does not provide Pathing capabilities across multiple visits.
  • Adobe SiteCatalyst derives its ROI from improvements made to the website and conversion rate increases that can be attributed directly to use of SiteCatalyst.
Webtrends, Coremetrics, Google Analytics
I think there are some interface improvements that reduce Adobe SiteCatalyst's usability. For example, having two different variable types (eVars and sProps), can be confusing to end-users. Additionally, there are few "out-of-the-box" reports and dashboards that a novice end-user can take advantage of right away. The learning curve on Adobe SiteCatalyst is greater than other tools like Google Analytics.
I have had many clients that are not thrilled with some aspects of the support. I think the actual day-to-day technical support (ClientCare) is great, but I have heard (and experienced) complaints about the the longer-term services (initial implementation, account management).
30
Adobe SiteCatalyst is normally used by web analysts, online marketers, product managers, campaign managers and website designers.
2
Normally Adobe SiteCatalyst is supported by one product owner and one or more developers. The product owner manages the relationship with Adobe, understands the product, may do in-house training, etc. Developers are responsible for writing the code required to capture the desired data in SiteCatalyst variables.
  • Adobe SiteCatalyst is used to provide directional guidance for improving websites. Using data collected about website use, web analysts can suggest website improvements that will improve conversion rates.
While there are other tools out there, customers who truly take advantage of Adobe SiteCatalyst's capabilities are likely to renew. Those only using a portion of its functionality may consider switching to Google Analytics, which has a simpler interface and often a cheaper cost.
Many clients switch to Adobe SiteCatalyst from a competing web analytics product (Webtrends, Coremetrics, etc.) or choose to upgrade from Google Analytics, which is a free product in the space.
  • Vendor implemented
  • Implemented in-house
  • Professional services company
I have found that initial SiteCatalyst implementations are too basic to be useful. Adobe professional services is usually tasked with the initial implementation using their "Fusion" methodology. This is good for vertical-based basics, but I find that many clients fail to go beyond this. This has the negative effect of selling SiteCatalyst short within the organization, since first impressions can be long-lasting.
  • Online training
  • In-person training
  • Self-taught
Myself and others have found the in-person training ok, but not outstanding. Trainers are good at explaining how to use the product features, but sometimes lack "real-world" experience on how to use the product as they are people who have often not previously been web analysts. There is also a shortcoming in company-provided training on advanced uses of the product. The implementation training is very good.
The online training for Adobe SiteCatalyst consists of short product videos. These are ok, but only go so far. For a while Adobe charged a fee for this, but recently made these available for free. There are many great blog posts that help users learn how to apply the product as well.
I have found that Adobe SiteCatalyst is a difficult product to learn, but more and more resources are now available to help with this including a publicly available book on the product.
No
Adobe SiteCatalyst has a good up-time track record, but there are cases in which the interface reports a "Network Acceleration" issue, which can be frustrating. There are also times when data can be "latent" for customers, but most of these cases are due to spikes in traffic or temporary server issues.
For the most part, Adobe SiteCatalyst reports work ok, but there are cases in which reports take a long time to return. These cases are usually when too much data has been stored in Conversion Variables (eVars).
  • E-mail tools like ExactTarget, Responsys
  • CRM tools like Salesforce.com
  • Marketing Automation tools like Eloqua & Marketo
  • Voice of Customer tools like OpinionLab and Foresee Results
  • Customer experience tools like Tealeaf and ClickTale
Many 3rd party products can be integrated with Adobe SiteCatalyst using the Genesis (API) integrations that have been built over the years. These integrations are a great way to combine data from multiple tools and are a key differentiator for Adobe SiteCatalyst over other web analytics tools.
My main advice would be to learn as much as you can about the product before entering the sales process. Most clients buying the product are ignorant of its features and as a result end up buying the wrong stuff and paying a price for it later. I suggest going to training before you buy the product or reading as much as you can about the product ahead of time. Even better, talk to a product expert and have them coach you throughout the buying process.
Return to navigation