AteraPricing

full monitoring, patch management & remote access features at an affordable price. Less Recommendation for large enterprises with huge IT infrastructures … management tools into Atera resulted in annual cost savings of nearby 5K$ to 9k$ due to reduced licensing fees and…

pay-per-technician pricing just made sense for us. They don't nickel-and-dime either. NinjaOne, by contrast, was over twice as expensive to start out, but … services that separately did some of the features of Atera, but combined costed nearly twice what Atera itself costs for one technician. So, in this aspect &…

staff to support them. The value of charging per technician verses per device cannot be stated enough. Without that pricing, I wouldn't be able to budget … product is their pricing. Atera charges by the technician, not the device like everyone else does. This is a great value…

patches installed need some upgrades and lack occasional functionality Its pricing structure Scope of improvement in being a CRM

good feature sets and value levels. Some of the other products were difficult to setup and lacked good flow between tools. The value proposition was also … in-house and save us having to pay an MSP for support. We have realized 6 figure cost reductions by implementing the…

Constraints: While Atera is cost-effective for many, if your school's IT budget is extremely tight, you might find the cost a consideration, especially … ConnectWise, and Kaseya, Atera stands out for its user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness. While SolarWinds offers robust features, it can be overwhelming … was driven by its balance of comprehensive…

and more. Atera is simple to use and cost effective, majority of competitors price per endpoint where Atera prices per agent. The software is not best in … Easy deployment Low Cost Hands off patch management … Atera was more cost effective, easy to deploy and had all…

for small MSP companies. It can become expensive when working with a lot of techs since is it a per user price. … logical choice for me to choose. However their pricing is from a different world. For a starting company, price is obviously an important par…

for, are missing. The product is amazing but is lacking some features. The value is great since they are on a per tech billing option instead of a per machine … machine. To it makes a lot of sense for internal IT departments, but the value is still there for an MSP.

without it, unless they change the structure and begin charging per device managed, or the cost becomes prohibitive for small business. … third party to assist us with administration of devices, protection, etc. The cost was exorbitant, and the service was deplorable. What…

new users. Adds value and automation that can be monetized. All in one solution that provides secure 2fa but full features at a lower cost then logmein … The pricing and features were laid out in a simple and straightforward layout. They have not price gouged while adding…

question. But for smaller companies like us, having a technician cost vs a per device cost was the tipping point. We can add as many devices as we want without … rapidly to see where problems lie. The fact that there is no "per device" charge allows us to do broad installs without concern over costs. Two areas that … going to be quickly retired once you get a lay of the l…

Both users are in charge of IT dept. My CTO and I (IT Manager) use Atera for reports, patching, and

have an infinite budget to pay for all of those endpoints at the prices other RMMs charge on a per-device basis. Also, the team feels smaller and more connected … add your own cool scripts to the pool if you have something useful. The price is also very competitive for the one man shop that I am and allows me to … I did like NinjaOne…

products like anti-virus give a complete package for the client that is affordable. … selling feature. The product combined with a anti-virus add-on is a great value to clients. … The product works very well and has a great price.

N-central had more features but was way more expensive to run. The features that N-central have over Atera were ones we were not

for a small team, or where the ratio of admins to systems is very great. Price increases, plus our team expanding caused us to shop around. We were also

is per technician/agent it is a fixed cost no matter how many devices are on the system. This allows for cheaper and more flexible scalability. Patch Management

small number of issues, it may be easier to use a less robust and more affordable system.

for us was the pricing model for Atera. Most other providers charged a fee per endpoint which could quickly add up. With Atera's pricing model, we have … Atera is an affordable solution for MSPs lo…

Easier to understand and use, more affordable.

click install feature save lots of time Overall this RMM is good for its price

Atera has the perfect pricing plan for our business and does a great job integrating all the tools that … Atera has allowed us to be creative in the way we price our plans to customers Atera saves us a lot of time when it comes to setup and configuration

ticked all the boxes and more; it came in one product and was extremely good value.

It's "per tech" pricing allows for lots of devices to be handled for a very sharp price It cuts down hundreds of hours with automation … the most important difference is the pricing. whilst Kaseya charges per device, Atera charges per technician, and a technician can handle…