Skip to main content
TrustRadius
BWise

BWise

Overview

What is BWise?

BWise is an Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) platform formerly owned and supported by Nasdaq, acquired by SAI Global in April 2019.

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is BWise?

BWise is an Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) platform formerly owned and supported by Nasdaq, acquired by SAI Global in April 2019.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

6 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is ManageEngine ADAudit Plus?

ADAudit Plus offers real-time monitoring, user and entity behaviour analytics, and change audit reports that helps users keep AD and IT infrastructure secure and compliant.Track all changes to Windows AD objects including users, groups, computers, GPOs, and OUs.Achieve hybrid AD monitoring with a…

What is Egnyte?

Egnyte provides a unified content security and governance solution for collaboration, data security, compliance, and threat detection for multicloud businesses. More than 16,000 organizations trust Egnyte to reduce risks and IT complexity, prevent ransomware and IP theft, and boost employee…

Return to navigation

Product Details

BWise Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(6)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-2 of 2)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
BWise is used as a GRC platform to manage multiple compliance initiatives for SOX, IT compliance, PCI compliance, Procurement compliance, Internal Audit, and Management Self-testing.
BWise is integrated with TeamMate audit tracking, for internal audit testing and annual compliance testing.
BWise is used for testing across the enterprise, giving management a view into the control effectiveness, across the company, and across compliance initiatives.
  • Bwise is very customizable to accommodate multiple compliance initiatives, across the enterprise.
  • Integration with TeamMate, made tracking audit testing and results easy to stay on top of.
  • Being able to map controls, and test once, and report control effectiveness for multiple initiatives was important.
  • Integration with SAP for continuous control monitoring.
  • Control mapping to standards: ISO; COSO; COBIT; HIPAA; SP800_53 (NIST); FedRAMP; PCI_DSS; BITS; GAAP; AICPA; BSI; CCM; COPPA; CSA
  • Surveys.
Well suited for general compliance, multiple initiatives, and integration with TeamMate.
SAP GRC Process control may be better suited for an SAP environment.
Oracle GRC may be better suited for an Oracle environment.
Overall, BWise is a very cost effective, and flexible solution.
Governance, Risk & Compliance (5)
86%
8.6
Common repository of GRC items
90%
9.0
Risk management
90%
9.0
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
70%
7.0
GRC policy management
90%
9.0
Incident management
90%
9.0
  • BWise was the most cost effective, and flexible solution evaluated, and eventually implemented.
  • BWise is a great repository for controls, and for managing GRC compliance.
  • BWise handled mapping multiple compliance initiatives to the master controls very well.
  • BWise integrated with TeamMate for testing controls very well.
Also evaluated, and implemented SAP GRC Process control for Continuous Control Monitoring in SAP. Initially selected BWise for cost and flexibility.
50
SOX Compliance; IT Compliance; PCI Compliance; Procurement; Internal Audit; External Audit; Management Self-testing; Finance and Accounting; HR; Surveys.
5
IT Admin; BWise Admin; Business Compliance Managers; Management; Steering Committee.
  • Control compliance.
  • Control testing.
  • Control remediation tracking.
  • Management awareness.
  • Integrating with TeamMate for control testing, tracking, remediation.
  • Management awareness.
  • Management Self-testing.
  • Continuous control monitoring.
  • Managing additional compliance initiatives.
  • HR Employee surveys.
BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.
Yes
We replaced RCTS, Sharepoint, Excel, SQL, and other home grown tools.
  • Price
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
  • Product Reputation
  • Positive Sales Experience with the Vendor
  • Third-party Reviews
BWise affordability and flexibility to manage multiple compliance initiatives was the biggest factors. Next was the integration with TeamMate for audit tracking, and control testing.
Evaluating short term objectives verses strategic long term objectives.
  • Vendor implemented
  • Implemented in-house
  • Professional services company
We implemented in-house, with the help of the vendor, to customise for our environment and implementation.
We used Deloitte as a consultant, to provide project management, and implementation expertise for our custom, and complex environment.
We implemented multiple compliance initiatives (SOX; PCI; IT General controls; Procurement; Audit; Management Self-testing, HR Employee Surveys; Questionnaires; and other Surveys.
Multiple companies, and multiple locations across the enterprise.
Yes
The project was broken into Definition phase; Development phase; Documentation; Implementation phase; Go live; Ongoing support.
The project was very complex, with defining the master data, and mapping controls to multiple compliance initiatives, for multiple companies, in multiple locations. We also performed a custom integration with TeamMate, for Audit integration, testing, tracking, reporting, and remediation.
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
The biggest issue was organizational conflict and competing objectives between Finance (SOX); IT compliance; Internal Audit; and Procurement.
We brought together a Steering committee, with the project sponsors, and the Business and Process owners represented.
Having a consultant act as the PMO helped objectivity, and communicating clearly how competing objectives, requirements, and concerns were being addressed.
  • Competing business objectives was the most significant issue encountered.
  • Project management, and managing the timeline was the next significant issue.
  • Customization of the complex environment, and implementation was an issue.
  • Implementing multiple compliance initiatives at once was a challenge, but considered necessary to move to one tool set.
The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.
Yes
We have a complex environment, and support multiple compliance initiatives. We have custom integration with TeamMate for audit testing, tracking, and remediation. Our control framework and control mapping is complex, with Master controls mapped to multiple initiatives, locations and companies. We have also integrated Management Self-testing, HR Employee evaluations, and other questionnaires and surveys.
BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.
Yes
Bwise manages bug reports and fixes in a timely and responsive manner.
BWise worked very closely with us, and helped us through a very complex implementation. Sales, and product support were very knowledgeable, and capable, with a very in-depth understanding of the product, and how to customise and adapt the framework for our environment, and complex requirements.
We implemented multiple compliance initiatives, across multiple companies, across a multinational enterprise.
We also performed a custom integration with TeamMate, for audit control testing, tracking, and reporting.
  • Managing the Master control list.
  • Managing multiple compliance initiatives.
  • Mapping controls to the multiple compliance initiatives, multiple companies, and many locations.
  • Dashboards, and reporting results.
  • Managing and restricting views across lines of business, companies, locations, and compliance initiatives.
  • Custom integration with audit tools like TeamMate, but we completed an effective integration.
  • Mapping controls to standards, COSO, COBIT, ISO, HIPAA, PCI, NIST.
  • Most standard GRC requirements were managed pretty well.
I found BWise to be very intuitive and user friendly.
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
The BWise application is the tool we're using to support and implement our governance, risk, and compliance project. It is an ERM (Enterprise Risk Management) corporate-wide initiative sponsored by our executive officers. It encompasses our financial, compliance, audit and risk divisions. This project objective is to increase integration among the aforementioned divisions, minimize silos, and improve efficiency and reporting to senior management.
  • Great reporting tool (uses SAP Business Objects). It is quite flexible on types of reports that can be created and supported. Also the reporting consultants are very competent and nice.
  • Highly customizable solution: almost everything can be tailored to an organization's needs, assessments, audits, issues, recommendations, tasks, etc. However, there's a trade-off between customization and the integration of different areas of the organization.
  • Increases visibility and efficiency in the organization. BWise offers centralized repositories (catalogs) that can be easily accessed and used by everyone in the organization (e.g. Process catalog, Policies and Procedures catalog, Risks, Controls, Laws catalogs, etc.). Also, the application allows findings on controls tested by Audit to be automatically reflected in controls monitored by SOX for example, without the need for SOX to retest them. So one area can leverage on the work of other areas increasing operational efficiency.
  • Increases integration and avoids silos. By choosing the correct design (e.g. Risk Workshops instead of Open Assessments), one area can see and benefit from another areas' work. An example was mentioned above; another would be Operational Risk area considering the results of Business Continuity, Vendor Management, Info Security, etc. assessments when carrying out theirs. Additionally, processes can be integrated: when contracting a new vendor for instance, one can include questions about data confidentiality and usage of models in the Vendor risk assessment. Answers to these could then trigger Info Sec / Model Risk assessments.
  • Increases accountability. Application provides full audit/change log with the type of change, name of executor, and date of change.
  • Easier follow-up. BWise sends automatic emails with reminders to the people required to take action on an issue, assessment, etc.
  • Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
  • Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
  • Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
  • Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
  • Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
  • Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).
- What does our organization aim to achieve with the application?
- Who will be using the tool?
- How mature is our organization in the areas/processes that will fall in scope?
- Are our areas averse to change?
- How flexible and prone are our areas to modify their way of doing business and processes/procedures to accommodate BWise?
- After implementation, who and how will perform application maintenance and change management (e.g. how easy will it be to update user privileges, central catalogs, assessment configurations, etc).
Governance, Risk & Compliance (4)
77.5%
7.8
Common repository of GRC items
80%
8.0
Risk management
60%
6.0
GRC policy management
80%
8.0
Incident management
90%
9.0
  • Increased employee efficiency especially considering incident management and follow up.
  • Increased visibility and senior management information/awareness.
  • Increased employee accountability.
  • Reduction of silos.
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
SAP Business Objects
Return to navigation