Overview
What is Rally Software?
Rally Software headquartered in Boulder, Colorado developed the Rally agile software development / ALM platform which was acquired by CA Technologies and rebranded as CA Agile Central. After CA's acquisition by Broadcom the software was once again rebranded as Rally.
User interface could be more intuitive
Powerful Agile Tool
CA Rally Delivers Information in a Not So Intuitive Manner
Rally helped me to deliver successfully several projects for our customers.
Best-suited to large organizations
Want the best of Agilecraft (Scaling Agile support) & ALM (Test Management), go for CA Agile Central (Rally)
Review of Rally
Love Rally!
More than adequate, but disappointing and getting more so over time.
CA Agile Central is the cream of the crop
Why we switched from CA Agile Central (formerly Rally)
CA Agile Central (formerly Rally): it was good while it lasted
Can't live without Rally
Rally - very extensive but pricey (worth it?)
Seems to make things harder rather than easier!
Pricing
What is Rally Software?
Rally Software headquartered in Boulder, Colorado developed the Rally agile software development / ALM platform which was acquired by CA Technologies and rebranded as CA Agile Central. After CA's acquisition by Broadcom the software was once again rebranded as Rally.
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
47 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Wrike?
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
What is Sauce Labs?
Sauce Labs is a cloud-based platform for automated testing of desktop and mobile applications. It is designed to be instantly scalable, since it is optimized for continuous integration workflows. (The vendor says that when tests are automated and run in parallel on multiple virtual machines across…
Product Demos
Daptiv Project Portfolio Management Software and Rally Integration Demo
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Rally Software?
Rally Software Competitors
- Digital.ai TeamForge
- IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
- PTC Windchill RV&S
- Azure DevOps (formerly VSTS)
Rally Software Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(120)Community Insights
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
Powerful Agile DevOps Planning and Tracking: Many reviewers have found Rally to be a powerful tool for agile DevOps planning and tracking. It provides rapid visibility of progress or problems across a large number of teams, allowing users to effectively manage and prioritize tasks.
Portfolio View for Clear Visibility: Reviewers appreciate the portfolio view feature of Rally, as it allows product management to have clear visibility across all their product features. This feature helps in effectively managing and prioritizing tasks by providing a comprehensive overview of the project's progress.
Strong Feedback Metrics for Task Tracking: Users have mentioned that Rally provides strong feedback metrics for both teams and individuals. This feature helps in tracking the status of tasks and ensuring that commitments are being met, contributing to efficient task management.
Difficult to Use Without Training: Many users have expressed frustration with the software's steep learning curve, stating that it is difficult to use without any training or guidance. They find it almost impossible to know how to complete their daily tasks effectively.
Insufficient Online Documentation: Some users have reported a lack of free online documentation available to help them navigate the software. This absence makes it challenging for them to find the information they need and leaves them feeling unsupported.
Overly Complicated User Interface: Several reviewers have mentioned that certain views of the user interface are overly complicated, causing confusion and hindering their ability to perform tasks efficiently. Users suggest simplifying these interfaces would greatly enhance their overall experience with the software.
Users highly recommend CA Agile Central for enterprise product management, highlighting its usefulness in running Agile projects and implementing Agile methodology. It is considered a one-stop tool for project management, reporting, and email notifications. Users suggest sticking with CA Agile Central and utilizing the features that work best for each team, as well as giving it some time to get used to without adapting it too much to the organization.
Reviewers recommend Rally Software over Atlassian Jira, finding it more intuitive and easier to use. They praise Rally as a comprehensive solution for Agile teams, automating the entire Agile practice. Rally is particularly recommended for organizations planning to adopt the Scaled Agile Framework Methodology (SAFe). However, users suggest checking out Jira for more add-ons and cheaper options but still highly recommend Rally over Jira.
Users suggest considering other project/product management tools before making a decision about CA Agile Central's future availability due to recent acquisition concerns. They also recommend thoroughly testing other options in the market that provide similar functionality at a lower cost. Additionally, users highlight that CA Agile Central is well-suited for large organizations and recommend having at least one person familiar with the software for a smoother transition. They also suggest using Assembla instead of CA Agile Central as an alternative option.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-5 of 5)Powerful Agile Tool
- Great to use as a requirements repository for software
- Great for creating sprints and assigning user stories as work
- Great for exporting requirements and defects for reporting
- The UI for sprint work is not visually as helpful as Jira's
- Cannot customize fields within defects and user stories within different teams if a different team owns the license
- Created a positive and efficient experience to help push agile into our teams
- Provided a great tracking tool for more visibility into what the work is on a team
- Had consistent linkage between all the item IDs to be able to create all the required documents
On the client-facing side, reports run by our Product Owners let them know what tools they will have to make their job easier. On the dev side, it keeps us on track. On the executive side, the company can assess where we are in terms of tools to make doing business easier. Our accountants love it as it directly interfaces in with our time reporting so they can know what cost center to put work in.
- It does help us keep track of velocity and where we missed the mark.
- It lets you see your completed to planned ratio.
- It allows a clear view to project success throughout the organization.
- It is overly complicated in some views.
- Project Filtering seems buggy. Pinning a project does not always seem to help. Seems to default back to previous projects.
- Whereas it is great for project reporting, it is not nearly as easy as Jira for devs to use.
- It supports our version and Agile and we have been able to deliver because of it.
- It is complicated. A tool should not be complicated but rather easy to use. Rally is not.
- It is a lot costlier than tools such as Jira.
- Easy to set up, plan and estimate user stories.
- Easy track hours and update "to do" hours.
- Iteration Burn Down report is the best.
- Project development process is standard for all teams and customers.
- Rally Software monthly price for user is a little bit expensive.
- It is a little bit hard to set up relation between Epic stories vs Child US.
- Search by text is hard when you have a 2-3 year old project.
- You need to track and improve velocity
- You have a budget and you must control time
- Requirements are changing often
- Requirements are changing in the middle of the iteration
- You have to organize the work of developers and QA simultaneously
- Rally Software allows us to understand what was done and how much time & labor was in every task of your project.
Can't live without Rally
- Agile
- DevOps
- Planning
- Tracking
- Action
- Context Driven Testing
- Level 1 production support
- Vertical in healthcare
- ROI is cool
- Agile is great
- DevOps is the best fit
If it’s time to transition to software that’s specific to your Agile needs, check out some of these options for your team’s communication, reporting, and assessment requirements. Once you find a better tool set, your projects will be within the deadline.
- HIPAA regulations compliance
- Migration to new EMR/EPIC
- Risk analysis and testing
- Meaningful use reimbursement
- ICD-10 clinical coding for billing standards
- Infrastructure support (managed services platform)
- Interfacing with HL7 files
- Virtualization on server & storage
- Data storage and security
- Remote desktop & VDI
- Thin clients & Think clients
- Interoperability solutions
- Secure and remote accessibility
- Mobile device integration
- Backup & Storage
- Healthcare Intelligence
- Tech Service Org
- The Scaled Agile Framework®, or SAFe®, provides a recipe for adopting Agile at enterprise scale.
As Scrum is to the Agile team, SAFe is to the Agile enterprise.
- SAFe tackles the tough issues – architecture, integration, funding, governance and roles at scale. It is field-tested and enterprise-friendly.
- SAFe is the brainchild As Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland are to Scrum, Dean Leffingwell is to SAFe.
- SAFe is based on Lean and Agile principles.
- There are three levels in SAFe:
* Team
* Program
* Portfolio
At the Team Level:
- Scrum with XP engineering practices are used.
- Define/Build/Test (DBT) teams deliver working, fully tested software every two weeks. There are five to nine members of each team.
- Rally’s weekly webnar covers the basic practices at the team level.
At the Program Level:
- SAFe defines an Agile Release Train (ART). As iteration is to team, train is to program.
- The ART (or train) is the primary vehicle for value delivery at the program level. It delivers a value stream for the organization.
- EPIC localization
- OnBase upgrade
- UCS swap
- Pure replacement
- Internal sale diffcult
- Budget fight
- License upgrade
- Push to other group
- Expand to infrastructure team
- Get more project swap to agile
- To keep connecting my people, platform, and process for faster, smarter, better results.
- Making the right contribution to the community. Use Agile and Lean processes to manage the work of your team.
- Once you have tasted the positive result with Rally Software, you don't want to give up and come back to the old school of development pain any more.
What I dislike the most is that the experience isn't consistent - some data types can be created, renamed and tweaked extensively, while some others are set in stone and baked into the system. I would rather have that it was very scaled down, and that you could create your own data types for cards, instead of having a few baked-in types (Epic, Feature, UserStory, Request, Bug etc). And the cards are tied to metadata such as Release, Project, User, Role, Effort etc., - these cannot be modified and you cannot use them as you wish. You cannot rename card types or create more, delete unused types etc. You have to choose between points or hours as effort metric - but they don't work the same! Some features are not available when you choose points instead of hours. I'd rather it was only a label choosing "p" instead of "h". Multiple things like the above - some stuff is built-in and can't be changed and it can be very confusing. The API is a mess. Everything can be modified in every request, instead of having separate requests for modifying different objects. For instance: you add a comment to a bug, you have to include the user (as an object, not just an id) that authored the comment. However, if you accidentally input the wrong name for the user (but the correct ID), it will actually *change the name* of that user. WTF? The query language is very useful, but has some subtle bugs and inconsistencies.
- Product Features
- Product Reputation
- Vendor Reputation
- Analyst Reports
- Third-party Reviews
To focusing on the process of evaluating and purchasing software once my needs changed.
I might rule out a vendor or two based on what the RFP response tells me.
Time is money & I need to get the job done quick.
- Vendor implemented
- Planning
- Change control
- Compatibility
2) The Ops group: Just wish to make sure any change won't break current production envirements
All the stake holders has to be on the same page
Dedicated attention. The Answer Tech will work with me one-on-one to make sure my software issues are resolved. Help from the comfort of my home. I can stay comfortable in my home or office while my Answer Tech works on my computer remotely.
- Tracking
- Kanban
- Update
- Team work
- Trouble shooting
- Swap
- Down gred
Seems to make things harder rather than easier!
- Gives you a good view into your current active work week/ active sprint
- Provides a pretty good way to look at prior sprints
- It has so much flexibility and power that it actually makes simpler tasks complex – particularly backlog management and scheduling things into releases and sprints.
- It has a tough job of managing “epics” – things with 100s of small features, and being able to prioritize across them. Typically we have 2 epics in a release. We have no problem prioritizing epics, but it is hard to prioritize “stories” across epics. There are typically dozens of stories in an epic.
- It works - we have been able to get the job done. We could probably be doing better with something else.
- It helps us manage sprints, tie into auditing.
- Track what we are doing from sprint to sprint
- Track velocity/progress
- Provides audit trail as we complete work. We can tie the loop off on what code actually changed. This important for SSAE16 compliance.
- We found that the plug-ins offered some nice drag-and-drop functionality when review story status
- We are considering integrating our Ideas board so it will feed directly into Rally
- Product Features
- Product Reputation
- Vendor Reputation
- Implemented in-house
- Online training
- It was very difficult to manage epics and their child stories.
- Scheduling of stories into sprints was never as easy as I expected it to be
- Subversion version control system.
- Not at this time