Overview
What is Cascade CMS?
Cascade CMS (formerly Cascade Server) by Hannon Hill is a content management system, with built-in tools to help users eliminate stale content, increase digital outreach, and promote end-user adoption and accountability. Cascade CMS is designed for decentralized web teams…
Cascade Server rocks!
Cascade Server Gets the Job Done
The Gold Standard in CMS Enterprises for Higher Education and More
A robust CMS for all of your digital publishing needs
A fully-baked enterprise web content management platform
Scripps Research using Cascade for 9 years and still loving it!
Cascade, Spectate and Your Web Site: A winning combination
Cascade: What you see ISN'T what you get
Cascade Server is solid
Make your work efficient and counting.
Cascade is easy to use intuitively, coming from a place with limited HTML/CSS experience
Cascade in California
Cascade Server is Highly Customizable
Cascade Server: Easy for end users, customizable for developers
Cascade: Easy and Quick
Popular Features
- Publishing workflow (19)9.090%
- Role-based user permissions (19)8.080%
- Admin section (19)8.080%
- WYSIWYG editor (19)6.161%
Pricing
What is Cascade CMS?
Cascade CMS (formerly Cascade Server) by Hannon Hill is a content management system, with built-in tools to help users eliminate stale content, increase digital outreach, and promote end-user adoption and accountability. Cascade CMS is designed for decentralized web teams in most major industries,…
Entry-level set up fee?
- Setup fee optional
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
9 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Squarespace?
Squarespace is a CMS platform that allows users to create a DIY blog, eCommerce store, and/or portfolio (visual art or music). Some Squarespace website and shop templates are industry or use case-specific, such as menu builders for restaurant sites.
What is Square Online?
Square Online (formerly Weebly) is a basic content management system with blogging and eCommerce features. It can be utilized for building standard websites or specialized webpages for online stores.
Features
Security
This component helps a company minimize the security risks by controlling access to the software and its data, and encouraging best practices among users.
- 8Role-based user permissions(19) Ratings
Permissions to perform actions or access or modify data are assigned to roles, which are then assigned to users, reducing complexity of administration.
Platform & Infrastructure
Features related to platform-wide settings and structure, such as permissions, languages, integrations, customizations, etc.
- 7API(12) Ratings
An API (application programming interface) provides a standard programming interface for connecting third-party systems to the software for data creation, access, updating and/or deletion.
- 7.3Internationalization / multi-language(7) Ratings
The software supports multiple languages, countries, currencies, etc.
Web Content Creation
Features that support the creation of website content.
- 6.1WYSIWYG editor(19) Ratings
What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get editing tool allows users to build pages without writing code.
- 6Code quality / cleanliness(18) Ratings
Code generated by WYSIWYG editor is clean and validates according to W3C standards.
- 8Admin section(19) Ratings
The admin page is easy to navigate and use.
- 9Page templates(17) Ratings
The CMS has standard webpage templates or types of web pages (e.g. homepage, article page, interior page, blog page, etc.); users can also build custom templates.
- 5.5Library of website themes(2) Ratings
A library of website frameworks or themes is available as a starting point for building a website.
- 7Mobile optimization / responsive design(15) Ratings
The CMS helps users build webpages that work well on mobile devices – whether m-dot pages or responsively designed pages.
- 9Publishing workflow(19) Ratings
The software allows users to set up a custom workflow for updating the website, including approval processes.
- 6.4Form generator(7) Ratings
Users can build website forms for visitors to fill out.
Web Content Management
Features for managing website content
- 8Content taxonomy(13) Ratings
Users can create multiple levels and types of content categories including tags.
- 7SEO support(14) Ratings
The CMS helps users create the right website infrastructure (pagination, page headers, titles, meta tags, url structure, etc.) to increase the site’s visibility in search engine results.
- 9Bulk management(14) Ratings
Users can change an attribute on a group of documents or sites all at once through features such as global search and replace, making bulk changes easier.
- 6Availability / breadth of extensions(11) Ratings
There is a broad library of extensions, plug-ins, modules or add-ons that allow users to easily customize their websites without building custom code.
- 4.8Community / comment management(5) Ratings
Users can put post/page comments through an approval process, auto-approve commenters based on their email addresses, block commenters by IP address, delete comments, etc.
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- Downloadables
- FAQs
What is Cascade CMS?
Cascade CMS Features
Web Content Creation Features
- Supported: WYSIWYG editor
- Supported: Code quality / cleanliness
- Supported: Content versioning
- Supported: Admin section
- Supported: Page templates
- Supported: Mobile optimization / responsive design
- Supported: Publishing workflow
- Supported: Form generator
- Supported: Content scheduling
Web Content Management Features
- Supported: Internal content search
- Supported: Content taxonomy
- Supported: SEO support
- Supported: Browser compatibility
- Supported: Bulk management
- Supported: Availability / breadth of extensions
- Supported: Import / export
- Supported: Website analytics
Platform & Infrastructure Features
- Supported: API
- Supported: Internationalization / multi-language
Security Features
- Supported: Role-based user permissions
- Supported: User-level audit trail
- Supported: Version history
- Supported: Simple roll-back capabilities
CMS programming language or framework Features
- Supported: PHP
- Supported: Python
- Supported: Java
- Supported: .NET
Additional Features
- Supported: Full support of COPE (create once, publish everywhere)
Cascade CMS Video
Cascade CMS Technical Details
Deployment Types | On-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Windows, Linux, Mac |
Mobile Application | No |
Cascade CMS Downloadables
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(58)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
Cascade Server is a highly versatile content management system widely used by universities and colleges to manage multiple websites across various departments and administrative offices. Users with no web technology experience have found Cascade Server to be easy to navigate and use, resulting in an efficient web publishing environment. This has allowed departments with high update rates to have immediate control and updates through the IT department's back-end design and structural support.
Scripps Research, for example, has implemented Cascade Server across its entire institute, empowering individuals, studies, and departments to create their own websites without extensive intervention from the IT department. This has significantly saved time and costs. Northern Illinois University also relies on Cascade Server as its main web client, enabling everyone in the organization to easily update and manage their web pages, particularly in the Marketing and Web Communications Department.
Cascade Server's robust features such as versioning, check-in/out assets, workflow management, and cross-site sharing capabilities make it a powerful tool for managing multiple sites, approving content, and maintaining version control. With its intuitive user interface, staff can efficiently retrieve information from the content repository throughout the workday. Additionally, Cascade Server's integration with Spectate allows for personalized web content, easy form generation, and lead tracking. It serves as a comprehensive suite of web content tools that cater to diverse organizational needs.
The flexibility, adaptability, and scalability of Cascade Server have made it ideal for universities and organizations seeking a powerful CMS solution. Its ability to assign different roles and levels of access has been praised by users for providing a self-service tool for end users without web management experience. Furthermore, Cascade Server has enabled departments and programs without technical resources to build and maintain their own sites effectively. It has become instrumental in managing content from hundreds of university web pages while ensuring consistency across the organization. Additionally, Cascade Server has proven valuable for managing online journals by simplifying text placement, image inclusion, document attachment tasks, thus enhancing efficiency in journal management.
Time-saving Tool: Users have found Cascade Server to be a valuable time-saving tool for monitoring stale content and broken links on their public site. They appreciate the automatic handling of version upgrades on the cloud, which has been lightning fast and only takes about half an hour to convert a site with a large number of assets.
Intuitive Permissions: Setting permissions in Cascade Server is described as intuitive and easy to set up at both high or granular levels. Many users have praised the CMS for its ability to track assets and links when moved, deleted, or renamed, as well as its capability for allowing relational publishing of all affected assets.
Great Integration with Third-Party Products: The integration of Cascade Server with third-party products such as Google Analytics, SiteImprove, and WebDam is highly valued by users. They specifically mention the excellent customer service provided by Hannon Hill, the company behind Cascade Server.
Cons:
- Overwhelming and Challenging Interface: Many users have found Cascade CMS overwhelming and challenging to understand, especially without programming knowledge. The complex nature of the system makes it difficult for non-technical users to navigate and utilize effectively.
- Limitations with Images: Users have mentioned that Cascade CMS has limitations when it comes to working with images. Specifically, they find it challenging to save multiple versions of uploaded images and encounter difficulties in managing image-related tasks within the system.
- Complex Maintenance for Large Websites: Maintaining a large website can be difficult in Cascade Server due to its push architecture and the need to write a web services application for re-publishing template-specific pages. Users express frustration with these complexities, which make it time-consuming and labor-intensive to manage their websites efficiently.
Users commonly recommend purchasing consulting time from Hannon Hill to configure and set up Cascade CMS. They suggest considering WordPress for its ease of use and overall design, while acknowledging that Cascade CMS excels in revisions and file structure management. Additionally, users find Cascade CMS to be a powerful solution for enterprise-level content management, although it does require familiarity with Velocity templating language, XML, and structured content markup. They also highlight the ease of use for basic daily functions in Cascade CMS and praise Hannon Hill's customer support. Lastly, for users with advanced technical expertise, they suggest considering Drupal as an alternative option.
Attribute Ratings
- 9.1Likelihood to Renew26 ratings
- 6.7Availability4 ratings
- 8Performance1 rating
- 9.1Usability4 ratings
- 9.1Support Rating5 ratings
- 5Online Training1 rating
- 7In-Person Training1 rating
- 9.1Implementation Rating4 ratings
- 9Configurability1 rating
- 5Product Scalability1 rating
- 6Ease of integration1 rating
- 5Vendor pre-sale1 rating
- 6Vendor post-sale1 rating
Reviews
(26-44 of 44)Cascade Server -- Serves all your needs to its best !!
I work for the Architecture Department of our university, and my job is to create templates as per the department requirements, and I feel proud of being a part of this.
- What I personally like about Cascade Server is the fact that it does its best as a Content Management Website by providing minimum work of just entering text and uploading files to the department people who have to maintain the website but have no programming and development background.
- The Asset factories, Metadatas etc. makes it much more easier for the people who maintain their websites using Cascade. It makes every feature available in just one click.
- The above points were from the maintenance point of view. Now, as I developer, I would say, I enjoyed working on Cascade as it provides an easy way to write and execute your code. Also it provides the upload feature, where in you can simply upload the existing code file onto Cascade and use it as is or edit it if required.
- Also, I like that Cascade Server automatically generates code for some complex features such as index blocks.
- Personally, as a developer I feel it would be better to have a facility to see the page source directly from Cascade, rather than publishing the entire page and then looking the page source code, as sometimes looking at page source becomes important while debugging.
- Also, Cascade provides detailed documentation on how to implement different features provided by Cascade, however, I felt a little more documentation should be provided about what each features does, what is it exactly for. This would help the naive developers to understand the workflow easily. It took me sometime to understand what are content types for, why do we need configuration set, data definitions, format files etc.
- Apart from these, I find everything else perfect and easy to use, both as a developer and a website maintenance person.
Cascade Server - Just do it.
- It is very easy to customize to your needs as well as your users needs. You can build out custom editors for different departments based on what kind of content the need to display.
- It is really easy to use one editor to populate multiple pages not only in the same site but using different sites as well.
- Since you can have multiple publish points, it is really easy to test out different design options when working on a redesign.
- A bit of a learning curve from administration stand point if you don't have any programming knowledge.
Good But Not Great
- Text editing
- Picture implementation
- Basic display functions
- User interface
- Media implementation utilities
- Basic start-up guide
Cascade Server review by student
- Content addition including pictures, text, video
- Template creation common across various pages, thereby greatly reducing time
- Making header and footer blocks
- Managing the left and right panes
- Individual pages need to load faster
- Publish message sometimes takes a long time to be pushed across all machines, perhaps increase the speed of the publish message
- There is a problem with the hierarchy of the publish message pages, in other words, we have to publish the individual pages before publishing the page that calls them. This is a little confusing. Perhaps this could be addressed.
1. Is it easy to pick up?
2. Is it reliable?
3. Does it ever crash? If yes, how easy is it to recover?
Cascade Server Review from a beginner user
- Organizes pages- The organizational chart that Cascade has is very easy to navigate and makes it easy for employees to quickly find the page they are looking to edit.
- Simplicity of design- I appreciate that everything is very straightforward on Cascade when it comes to making edits, viewing pages and so on.
- Size of Cascade- there is plenty of room on this server to create as many pages as the website needs.
- Spell Check- I would love it if Cascade could learn to recognize names; it would be one less step I'd have to go through, but it is not a significant issue that causes me to believe Cascade needs improvement.
- Although I use Cascade Server regularly to update the website, the edits I do are not complex enough to reveal any problems at this time, so I don't have any suggestions from room for improvement.
- Stable (server never went down on me).
- Their online documentation makes it easier to solve (daily) issues you may face.
- Does not have a steep learning curve. You only need some hours of hands-on instruction.
- The WYSIWYG can be improved. Extremely basic for widely used CMS
- Image editing can be improved. Pictures need to be uploaded as you want them to see. Cropping or size reduction are not handy.
- The HTML editor can be improved. The HTML editor is simpler than Microsoft Wordpad. Taking into consideration that front end users just edit the pages, you need to have an intermediate-to-advance command of HTML
- The user interface provides a clear, easily navigable way to work on web pages, both insofar as small-scale edits and the wholesale generation of new pages are concerned. Any given site's hierarchical structure and your current position (if any) within it is clearly visible in the sidebar at all times, which makes for efficient work.
- Powerful context menus that allow for easy editing of existing pages, the generation of new content, adding new files, deleting, moving, and publishing assets.
- The overall editing interface is fairly intuitive and easy to use, including both GUI-style elements and the ability to write or edit in HTML mode for more precise page creation and modification. Videos and links can be easily embedded as well.
- Copy/cut/paste shortcuts triggered via the editing context menu don't work in Firefox, although the corresponding keyboard shortcuts are fortunately still usable (for example, CTRL-C/X/V). This is a bit annoying, although not a deal-breaker since I normally use keyboard shortcuts anyway, but it would be good to see this addressed in future builds.
- It would be nice if there was an actual drag-and-drop move function, in addition to the context menu's "move" function. It would certainly simplify some of the basic recurring website updates, and particularly when older files and other embedded content needs to be moved to another area for archival purposes.
- It's nice that the CMS will check your edits for seeming-errors when you go to publish, but many of the error messages are unclear insofar as exactly what they mean. Since I have only limited fluency in HTML, more instructive error feedback would be very helpful.
Cascade Server - Easy to design, tough to bring down
- Dashboard - This gives the summary of all the major notifications and status updates. For example, the documents that are pending or need to be published.
- Saves draft of edited pages before publishing them. This helps in continuing the work back from where it was left.
- Assets can be uploaded from anywhere in the document. For example, while creating hyperlinks to internal documents, cascade gives you the ability to upload documents from that position without having to navigate to a different screen/page.
- If changes are made and published in one page, I've often had to publish the entire base folder to push forward the same changes and see them on the front end.
- Pages stored in cache memory can create some problem. I had to open a new incognito window and refresh the website to see the changes in the front end.
- The biggest problem I've had is ghosting of pages. If by any chance while moving or deleting the pages, Unpublish is unchecked the pages still remain in the backend and they are tough to find for deleting them. Because of this, they cannot be over written, old versions load on the website and new updates are not seen.
- One thing that can be done is display a popup of Unpublish checkbox or give a tool tip to explain what will happen if the user doesn't unpublish the pages while moving or deleting them.
1. How many departments do you have?
2. What is the traffic you are expecting on a daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly basis?
3. Do you want to restrict any changes to the design by the authors who edit child websites on the server?
Cascade server simple yet decent tool for a CMS.
- Easy Interface
- Simple and an relate to HTML
- Short learning curve
- Well for starters the hierarchy implementation is a bit of pain
- Secondly, changing a link, we need to make sure other places referencing the link isn't broken
Cascade, all positive
- Publishes quickly
- Allows for repeat modifications and reviews
- Difficult to move and edit images and text within the page layout
Cascade Super Server
- Web Content Maintainence
- Recovery of content
- User friendly
- Too much tree structure.
- Not able to to view live on the browser.
- Browser dependent.
The true cost of Cascade Server: Hannon Hill understands that content management is more about people than technology
- In-context (i.e., in page as it appears) editing with a simple WYSIWYG editor that anyone who can use a word processor can understand
- Push system that results in easier server management and clean, compliant output
- Support from LIVE human beings that don't just refer you to a help document but will actually help you by telephone and email (i.e., great customer service)
- To be used to fullest potential, Cascade Server requires at least one developer who knows or is willing to learn Velocity script
- Setting permissions for users could be simplified as, depending on your build, there are some redundancies regarding user setup
During the selection process, give Hannon Hill an idea of what your designers or consultants have in mind for a design. Show them sites you like and sites you don't like. Ask them if Cascade Server can deliver the type of site you require. If you are a more traditional institution with a basic design in mind, you will spend less on customization and launch faster. If, like us, you are a design school, you will have to be up front about your needs and the possible cost involved in custom design and initial setup.
Also, ask the folks from Hannon Hill to demo the product in detail, both to a large room full of management types, and smaller groups by phone who will end up being the ones who will manage use of the product. Their team of sales, marketing and training staff explain the advantages of Cascade Server better than any other company I considered. Simply put, they seemed to care more than the competition did.
Is Hannon Hill's Cascade Server Right for you?
- One thing that is nice about Cascade Server is it sits on a different server than where it publishes to. The thought process behind this is if you ever need to upgrade or do maintenance or if your server running Cascade Server crashes, your site will still be live because the content that gets published sits on a different server. Unlike a CMS like WordPress. If WordPress crashes, your site crashes.
- Another awesome thing the Cascade Server does very well is they offer great customer service. You can give them a call at anytime and speak to a user support specialist who will walk you through a problem. You can also expect an email back within the day if you chose to send an email to user support instead. You might not even have to send an email if you search through the very well organized knowledge base they have on their site.
- Hannon Hill specialized in higher education. So being in Higher Ed, it makes it easier on both the college and Cascade Server to troubleshoot/compare/contrast with other colleges.
- Hannon Hill does have a handful of sites that they run that are not Higher Ed sites. So if you aren't in Higher Ed I wouldn't let that scare you away.
- One major thing that I would like to see differently is how often a new version gets rolled out. Recently, they decided to start rolling out a new version every few months rather than just having one big rollout once a year. It sounds great on paper that they are making so many improvements. But to gather the time it takes to upgrade Cascade Server at a particular time when it isn't affecting a ton of users across campus is tough. This usually ends with me being in my office upgrading Cascade at 3am every few months.
- Going based off of my last example, they have a remedy for this but it's a costly one. They have service plans that include Hannon Hill doing all of the hosting instead of you having Cascade hosted in house. With this plan they will upgrade Cascade Server whenever an update becomes available. Once again, sounds great on paper but it comes with a heavy price tag that makes it not affordable to do.
- Being web based makes for some clunky user interaction. It is a very robust system. With it being web based it makes it hard for Hannon Hill to make it portable. If you had a quick change to make on a page I wouldn't suggest trying to conquer that task on your phone. A tablet even is pushing it. Also going off of usability, it is very friendly in all browsers. Works wonders in Chrome and Firefox, works not so hot in any other browser.
- For all of their backend functions, they use Velocity. Which is a Java based language. It is very similar to your typical languages but to do anything other than your basic functions you need to know Java in order to accomplish something.
- It is very customizable provided that you have a good development team. You can make it work best for your content.
- Levels of user permissions and workflow allow you to give just enough access to employees in your organization so that they can update their own content, thus taking some work out of the admin's hands, while still requiring an approval process before publishing so that content can meet the Communications/PR office's standards.
- The system can be used to run multiple websites while your users have the same user accounts for those different websites.
- Workflow steps are clumsy. While workflow itself is good, there is a separate screen after the "Submit" button for users to add comments. The screens should be combined or developers should have an option to turn the comment field off.
- The notification e-mails Cascade sends with workflow steps are horrid. They contain no information about which page the e-mail is notifying you of. Due to this, our office had to come up with a standard for naming workflows after the page we are editing.
- The default interface text size is quite small. I always hit "Ctrl +" a few times before I start working to zoom the screen in.
- It handles the underlying HTML/CSS details very well. In my experience, in most of the cases, our accounts and HR department was easily able to create content quickly on the Cascade Server without needing help from any technical staff.
- It provides the ability to define multiple kinds of layout. This is essential for creating a decent UI without too much hassle.
- The style sheets are centrally located. I can change the logos for the entire website with just a few clicks. Also, I have restricted access to these config files to ensure that the site is not tarnished unknowingly by other employees. I thus don't have to worry about any sudden changes on the live server.
- Cascade Server does not allow for easy integration of JQuery plugins. Every time I hit enter on the content manager, it creates a new div. This really messes up my JQuery.
- The publisher queue SHOULD be multi-threaded especially when pushing to different sections of the website. It will greatly reduce waiting time for users.
- The "new" feature on the menu bar inside the Cascade Server takes forever to load. Why are the links on generated dynamically while the page is loaded like a normal menu-bar? It starts to load when I click on it and it takes about 3-6 seconds to load. Thats very bad response time.
Whatever you want, Cascade Server can do it!
- Cascade Server can be used to break down pages into "blocks" which are basically snippets of code that can be reused over and over again. Using index blocks makes many things on our site so much easier because the block basically finds the information for us, and then all we have to do is write a small XSLT or Velocity format to process that information. Cascade Server makes use of this very well so that we can easily make our pages more dynamic. It's almost like they write themselves at times.
- In Cascade Server, templates can be used in a way that can make updating the design of your site a breeze. Basically you have one or two base templates that every page on your site references, plus your css files. When it's time to change the design, all you really need to do is replace the css and change your template. You can rearrange and modify your blocks to make sure that they don't go crazy, but once the css and template have been updated, the rest is a piece of cake.
- User management is handled well in Cascade Server. We have ours tied in to Active Directory, and we add our users through the ldap connection. Once they have been added, however, managing them is easing with groups. I just give a group the permissions it needs and drop the users in. I think it's vital to be able to restrict what a user can edit, and at times, what they can even see. Cascade lets you show your users as much or as little as you want.
- For me, writing formats has been the bane of my existence at times. Now I am not technically a programmer, so it may come as no surprise that XSLT does not come easily to me. I can modify formats that have already been written, but not write new ones. That being said, the formats do work great, it can just be very technical for those who may not have those skills. However, I have found Velocity much easier to write and understand, but the only problem I have with it is the lack of documentation at times. Hannon Hill has been working to provide more support for Velocity though, so even though the formats can be very technical, they are becoming easier with Velocity.
- Workflows are great, but they can be confusing. Using the workflow builder is the way to go, but for the ones I have made, I have had to follow a tutorial each time. They can definitely take some getting used to as far as setting them up.
Some issues, but you can get by.
- MS Word-like interface for creating text
- Editing multiple times can be challenging since HTML code gets integrated and can lead to misformatting.
- Accordian features are not formattable.
- Limited options in sidebar (if you're not super fluent in HTML coding)
Cascade from a Support Staff member
- Cascade Server has a simple user interface. Along the left side there is a menu that is very easy to learn.
- Cascade Server responds very quickly. Some user interfaces take minutes to respond; Cascade takes only a couple of seconds.
- Cascade Server is very powerful. It is able to address a variety of web needs.
- It would be nice to customize the color scheme across the whole platform. More customization would allow for more comfortable use for some users.
- There are a lot of folders that are named something that a lot of users may not understand. Having a clean default name for top directories would be very helpful to newer users.
- Migration into Cascade server isn't the easiest. There could be many ways to improve this functionality.
Novice Cascade Server user review
- Easy to get used to the product because of the simple UI.
- Can design clean because of the editor view and code view
- Publishing and maintaining the structure of the website resources becomes lot easier because of the navigation view
- Highlight the corresponding code of the component clicked in design view, helps to find the it's code easily than searching it manually