Starting at $595 per appliance
View Pricing Overview
What is Cisco Meraki MX?
Cisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a combined UTM and Software-Defined WAN solution. Meraki is managed via the cloud, and provides core firewall services, including site-to-site VPN, plus network monitoring.
Learn from top reviewers
How Cisco Meraki MX Differs From Its Competitors
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Video Reviews
12 videos
Cisco Meraki MX Review
05:29
Cisco Meraki MX Review
09:29
Cisco Meraki MX Review
07:09
Pricing
MX64
$595
On Premise
per appliance
MX67
$695
On Premise
per appliance
MX68
$995
On Premise
per appliance
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.trustradius.com/buyer…
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Product Demos
Demo
meraki.cisco.com
Features
Return to navigation
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Cisco Meraki MX?
Cisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a Unified Threat Management (UTM) and Software-Defined WAN solution. As a UTM product, Meraki MX provides content filtering, app-specific traffic control, intrusion prevention, malware protection, and site-to-site VPN that is deployable on hardware or virtually. It also enables firewall management remotely for 24x7 monitoring and accessibility.
Cisco Meraki MX Competitors
Cisco Meraki MX Technical Details
Deployment Types | On-premise |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Windows |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Cisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a combined UTM and Software-Defined WAN solution. Meraki is managed via the cloud, and provides core firewall services, including site-to-site VPN, plus network monitoring.
Ubiquiti Networks UniFi, Fortinet FortiGate, and SonicWall TZ are common alternatives for Cisco Meraki MX.
Reviewers rate VPN and High Availability highest, with a score of 8.8.
The most common users of Cisco Meraki MX are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews From Top Reviewers
(1-5 of 153)
Cisco Meraki MX Review
Rating: 10 out of 10
April 11, 2025
RG
Vetted Review
Verified User
5 years of experience
- security
- connectivity
- customer support
Cons
- faster support call backs
- integrate umbrella into dashboard
Meraki Excels at Easy Scaling
Rating: 8 out of 10
April 05, 2025
CH
Vetted Review
Verified User
5 years of experience
- Ease of use
- Auto-VPN + SD-WAN
- Cellular Failover
- Robust Alerts via Webhooks
Cons
- Firewall Policies
- Hardware Performance Statistics
- IPS Performance + Efficacy
- Limited port counts when leveraging network templates on higher end units.
- No options for HTTPS decrypt or encrypt visibility
- No EIGRP Routing
- No ability to clear ARP table / release DHCP leases through GUI
Cisco Meraki MX does the job well, but has a few caveats that could come back to bite you if you aren't careful
Rating: 7 out of 10
March 13, 2025
JB
Vetted Review
Verified User
4 years of experience
- Decent web interface
- Support
- Content filtering
- Threat detection (when using the higher license)
Cons
- Intranet management (inability to NAT between LANs limits flexibility)
- Multitenancy from one device
- Limited in VPN options
- Always a recurring charge
- Difficult to troubleshoot when internet is down
Cisco Meraki MX Review
Rating: 10 out of 10
February 27, 2025
GM
Vetted Review
Verified User
2 years of experience
- It's very easy to deploy these devices because it's a cloud-based controlling controller that controls it. So able to, once the device has internet access, all you need to do basically is to look up the controller serial number and it'll basically find it. And once you add it to your network to automatically incorporate that device into your network and basically build the panels for the SD-WAN service.
Cons
- Room for improvement. I think we also use the Meraki device as a fire haul. The one area where I think there's a room of improvement is when you do fire hauling with the device. Basically it doesn't do what you call walks, so it can't act as a web fire. In other words.
Simple, Scalable and Fully Featured
Rating: 8 out of 10
March 04, 2025
KA
Vetted Review
11 years of experience
- SDWAN / Auto-VPN
- Rapid deployment to new location
- Zero touch provisioning
- Simple configuration
- Full visibility of traffic ingress and egress through the MX
- Traffic analytics
- Utilise Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client
Cons
- AnyConnect implementation needs to offer more bespoke configuration
- Content Filtering reporting is not very good
- Migration to new Dashboard has left a very mixed experience across pages