Overview
What is CrashPlan?
CrashPlan® provides secure, scalable, and straightforward endpoint data backup, to help organizations recover from any worst-case scenario, whether it is a disaster, simple human error, a stolen laptop, ransomware, or an as-of-yet-undiscovered calamity.
CrashPlan ticks a lot of the boxes but support lets it down.
A great and simple cloud backup solution
CrashPlan for the WIN
CrashPlan
Enterprise backups that easily scale across your organization
CrashPlan delivers piece of mind and speedy recovery
Crashplan Business is super simple and effective for our cloud backup strategy
CrashPlan cloud-based backup -- expensive but powerful
Great product for reliable backups at reasonable cost
CrashPlan the company safety net
Best file system back-up with excellent ROI
CrashPlan for all of your backup needs!
Cost Effective Flat Fee Backup Solution
CrashPlan- secure cost-effective online backup for home and business
CrashPlan, the best backup system on the market
Pricing
CrashPlan Essential
$2.99
CrashPlan Professional
$88
CrashPlan Enterprise
$108
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $2.99 per month
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is CrashPlan?
- External drive backup
- Customer File Retention
- Control over how long deleted files are retained
File Retention
Restore Files from Any Computer
Data Security
CrashPlan Features
- Supported: Automatic, continuous data protection
- Supported: Full visibility of all protected devices and data in a single dashboard
- Supported: Self-service restore
CrashPlan Competitors
CrashPlan Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | Apple iOS, Android, Windows Phone |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(149)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
Users have found the product to be extremely useful for project management, allowing them to easily track tasks, set deadlines, and monitor progress. This has been particularly beneficial for teams working on complex and time-sensitive projects. Customers have praised the product's collaboration features, which enable seamless teamwork, file sharing, and effective communication among team members. The ability to work together in real-time has significantly improved project efficiency and productivity. Additionally, reviewers have highlighted the product's robust reporting capabilities, which allow users to generate detailed reports and analyze project data. This feature has proven invaluable for tracking project performance and making data-driven decisions. Users have also appreciated the product's integration with other tools such as email clients and calendar applications, which streamlines task management and ensures seamless workflow. The customization options provided by the product have been highly valued by customers, as it allows them to tailor the software to their specific project management needs. Furthermore, reviewers have consistently mentioned the user-friendly interface of the product, making it easy for both experienced and novice users to navigate and utilize its features effectively. The availability of a mobile app has been particularly convenient for users who need access to their projects on the go. Additionally, customers have found the scalability of the product beneficial, as it accommodates the needs of both small teams and larger organizations. Finally, reviewers have praised the product's prompt customer support that offers helpful assistance when encountering any issues or questions. Users particularly appreciate this aspect as it enhances their overall experience with the product. Ultimately, users have reported that one of the most efficient features of the product is its task automation capability, which saves them valuable time and effort in managing repetitive or routine tasks.
Easy Deployment and Management: Users have consistently found the product to be easy to deploy and manage, making it convenient for administrators. Several reviewers mentioned that the setup process was straightforward and that they were able to configure the product in less than 30 minutes.
Complete Endpoint Protection: The complete endpoint protection provided by the product has been highly appreciated by users. Many reviewers highlighted how this feature is superior to relying on users to manually back up data, ensuring that important files are always protected.
Cloud Backup with Mobile Access: Users have praised the benefits of cloud backup offered by the product. They appreciate being able to back up their data even when they are out of the office, as well as having the convenience of accessing their files through a mobile app.
Cons:
- Java-based Program: Users have expressed dissatisfaction with the Code42 program being Java-based, citing increased resource usage, stability issues, and a clunky interface as drawbacks. Some users have reported crashes in the Java front end of the desktop program, requiring them to restart the service or their computer for resolution.
- Price and Trust Concerns: Several users have mentioned that they find Code42 to be more expensive compared to other backup services like Backblaze. The discontinuation of consumer options and the removal of the ability to back up to a remote machine on a different network have damaged trust between Code42 and its clients.
- Lacking Technical Support: The technical support provided by Code42 has been criticized for being lacking, with unclear support ticketing processes and limited phone support hours. Some users have expressed frustration with the level of assistance received when encountering issues with the software.
Based on user reviews, the following recommendations are frequently mentioned for CrashPlan:
-
Users suggest comparing CrashPlan to competitors to ensure better value and carefully evaluating their needs before making a decision. They advise considering alternatives like Backblaze and rsync before finalizing the choice.
-
CrashPlan's excellent support is highly recommended. Users suggest speaking with current Code42 users to gain insights into different use cases and understand how the product is utilized by other companies.
-
Users recommend implementing CrashPlan as soon as possible, especially for managing both Windows and Linux servers. They find CrashPlan to be a reliable and stable backup solution, making it suitable for both personal and business use.
These recommendations emphasize the importance of thorough evaluation, seeking opinions from other users, and taking advantage of CrashPlan's support for a successful implementation process.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-3 of 3)Try CrashPlan Pro. It will become your "Crash Plan"
- After the install the user doesn't have to do anything. Our remote users were used to having to copy data to an external drive for archiving. Which meant it usually wasn't done. The central office didn't have access to any of those files either.
- I am able to monitor which users are backed up and contact those that appear to be having issues.
- Since the install package exceeded the attachment size allowed with our email client I included an HTML link to the location of the download.
- The install took less than 10 minutes including the download of the software. Our documentation included screen shots of what the user should expect to see. This allowed remote users to install without having central IT get involved.
- The management website times out frequently requiring a re-login.
- Some of the information reported isn't consistent. Because each user can have multiple devices the number of devices doesn't match user number.
- The number of users is the number of accounts that you have set up. Not the number of active users.
- Some of the settings report inaccurately when first entering the screen. Refreshing the screen will update the settings. The help desk is aware of the problem and they are working to resolve the issue.
- We were using iDrive for the central office backup. With the amount of data we were using monthly the upgraded plan would have cost us as much as the entire install of Crashplan.
- Getting a backup solution for our remote users was a very high priority. We paid for the dedicated engineer to help with the install. This saved a lot of time researching or hunting information for the install. It paid for itself is saved time for our IT department.
- Employee changed a BIG excel spread sheet and the formulas stopped working. Restored to previous version in seconds.
- Complete user profile restore after a hard drive crashed.
- local restore of a remote users files when cloning a laptop for a new employee
- Ransom ware recovery.
- Meet government requirements for data retention.
- Peace of mind for our board knowing we have the data backed up and accessible.
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Third-party Reviews
- Implemented in-house
- Getting remote users to install.
- How about a central dashboard for the program.
- Make a change and push it out to all or a select group of users.
- No remote user intervention required.
- A function I used (night dashboard look) was removed in an update. I had to search to find why it changed and wasn't working.
- Detailed backup control from a central administrative interface.
- Continuous backup with granular control of CPU and bandwidth use.
- True cross-platform support for OS X, Linux and Windows.
- Architectural flexibility, including endpoint-to-server conversion, transparent server load balancing and redundancy, and simple storage archive import and migration.
- Trivial installation and setup for both client and server.
- Private cloud server is no longer available in a license package which supports businesses requiring fewer than 25 licenses.
- Public cloud option remaining to small business is not a good fit for creative businesses generating gigabytes of new content per day.
- Web console is not compatible with desktop Safari, and has issues with mobile Safari as well.
- My current employer doesn't track ROI for software licenses, but I have certainly seen CrashPlan save many times its license cost in recovered data after crashes and drive corruption.
- Windows Backup, rsync and Time Machine
- Backup
- Recovery
- Administration
- Storage Point Management
- Migration
- Installation
- None.
CrashPlan...your backup plan.
- CrashPlan is a lightweight application that runs in the background. I don't even know that it is there.
- Data migrations are greatly simplified using CrashPlan. In the past we used the Windows Data Migration tool and had to wait for all the data to transfer from one computer to the other via an ethernet cable. With CrashPlan, we simply initiate a restore of data on the new computer and the user is on their way.
- For enterprise implementations, CrashPlan also has a web-based management console. This can help simplify management of users, but also can be used to initiate a restore for a user without them even needing to stop by our help desk.
- When it comes to our servers, sometimes the CrashPlan client can cause slowness, but it usually has to do with what else the server is used for. (e.g. SQL, File Server, etc.)
- While the management console is a great tool to have, the UI can be a little cumbersome. Links to information are not always obvious.
- With CrashPlan, the user is able to initiate restores on their own, with little to no help from IT staff. The client UI is quite easy to use, especially with their new client with release 5.1.
- CrashPlan has freed up time for both end users and IT staff with it's simplicity and seamless backup.
- The capability for a hybrid approach is useful when a large restore is needed quickly. You can have both on-site and cloud backup destinations.
- Metiix and Symantec Backup Exec
- Setting up the folders to be backed up.
- Restoring to the "original location" on the current computer or a new one.
- Some aspects of the management console can be confusing, like the user and device management.
- Setting up a hybrid solution is not difficult, but seems to be a little cumbersome.