Related Quote from Verified User
little more affordable in terms of cost. … Cost-effective
Dell Avamar is a hardware and software data backup and deduplication product. It provides protection and recovery through a complete software and hardware solution when paired with Dell Data Domain for virtual environments, remote offices, enterprise apps, NAS servers, and desktops/laptops.
The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other software in similar categories
Veeam’s® premier product, Veeam Backup & Replication™, delivers availability for all cloud, virtual, Kubernetes and physical workloads. Through a management console, the software provides backup, archival, recovery and replication capabilities.
Carbonite Server (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a full backup and discovery solution. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite Server users can protect virtually any type of file on both…
Microsoft System Center Suite is a family of IT management software for network monitoring, updating and patching, endpoint protection with anti-malware, data protection and backup, ITIL- structured IT service management, remote administration and more. It is available in two editions: standard and…
little more affordable in terms of cost. … Cost-effective
think it is not a really nice solution in terms of pricing, so the challenge here is to check if the value [is] worth it.
Currently Avamar is not being used at all so the appliance is effectively an expensive paper weight. Previous versions of Avamar were no better and we constantly
Very cost effective. Can back up huge amount of servers. For huge environment we can
several years, which would require a new big investment, which makes it expensive. … It could be expensive to purchase the hardware needed for the vendors to provide the service … appliances, then it could be set up to provide the cloud service to the price that could…
The cost to start is very cheap Client can decide how much data is transferred Flexibility makes
It is expensive. Initial setup of clients is a little clunky.
Initial purchase cost is on the high end. After initial support package has expired the cost to renew is extremely high. Media export … willing to purchase the replication grids. For smaller companies Avamar is cost prohibitive. Avamar is designed for large companies and…
Domain, the cost has been greatly reduced. Instead of the need to purchase many nodes, one Data Domain can replace them creating a significant cost savings
backup solutions were vetted and cost to storage and feature options were compared. The final decision came down to cost of storage and ease of setup and … storage to cost Technical support … Renewing Avamar c…
gives us security in disaster recovery. Avamar has had a poor ROI. It has cost more [than it has returned].
Although Avamar is expensive, it allow us to comply with corporate retention policies.
Cost. Avamar is too expensive. The tape out feature is garbage. It's repackaged Legato Networker and
Avamar is scaleable but expansion is expensive. Storage management could be improved regarding checking real-time available … incremental backups is slow and unreliable. FireEye backup to the cloud was cost prohibitive at the time, and end user confidence was not high for…
Even though Avamar appears expensive out of the box, the fact that they don't charge by the client makes them affordable over other solutions if you have … For a small business, it is cost prohibitive. For anyone who needs to back up over the WAN or has a large … bac…