Skip to main content
TrustRadius
OpenText Documentum

OpenText Documentum

Overview

What is OpenText Documentum?

OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise…

Read more
Recent Reviews

EMC Documentum Review

5 out of 10
February 23, 2019
Incentivized
We use it as a central repository for our documentation. Documentum provides secure storage for all our documents. It provides granular …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Popular Features

View all 13 features
  • Content capture & imaging (7)
    10.0
    100%
  • File sync, storage & archiving (7)
    9.0
    90%
  • Document management (7)
    9.0
    90%
  • Records management (7)
    9.0
    90%
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is OpenText Documentum?

OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise…

Entry-level set up fee?

  • Setup fee optional

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

105 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is Dashpivot - By Sitemate?

The Dashpivot Systems Cloud is an integrated management system designed for built world companies - replacing paper forms, spreadsheets, word docs, PDFs, static folders and clunky apps with a single no code software platform.Via the Dashpivot Systems Cloud, processes and procedures across critical…

What is Curata?

Curata's content marketing platform (Curata CMP) enables more efficient content creation with greater impact on pipeline. According to the vendor, this solution enables users to: Analyze marketing and sales pipeline impact: Instantly access content metrics such as leads generated/touched and sales…

Return to navigation

Product Demos

Documentum Demo

YouTube
Return to navigation

Features

Enterprise Content Management

Features related to managing business content and transactional content for enterprises.

9.2
Avg 8.2
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is OpenText Documentum?

OpenText Documentum Video

OpenText Documentum Overview

OpenText Documentum Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating Systems,
Mobile Application,

Frequently Asked Questions

OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.

Amaxus CMS (discontinued), OnBase, and Microsoft SharePoint are common alternatives for OpenText Documentum.

Reviewers rate Content capture & imaging and Security, risk management & information governance and Integration highest, with a score of 10.

The most common users of OpenText Documentum are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(17)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Users of the Open Text web app have made several recommendations based on their experiences. The three most common recommendations are:

  1. Stay true to document management standards before creating a system: Users recommend ensuring that the system adheres to established document management standards in order to maintain accuracy and efficiency.

  2. Explore other options before choosing Documentum: While some users find Documentum to be a good repository for saving documents and data, they suggest considering other interfaces that may offer more efficient solutions.

  3. Consider PLM tools as an alternative: Users suggest that Agile and Arena, among other PLM tools, may be better than Documentum for managing documents. However, if a PLM tool is not an option, Documentum is considered the best out-of-the-box tool available.

It is important to note that while some users recommend Documentum for its record management and documentation capabilities, others caution about high maintenance costs and the need for skilled labor. Additionally, users suggest negotiating pricing and packages, having experienced implementors and administrators, evaluating flexibility in accommodating changes, and considering long-term vision and investment. Some users even recommend using Documentum in specific browsers or replacing it with a more robust platform for web content management.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-1 of 1)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Indars Sparnins | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
EMC Documentum ECM products are being used across the company I am currently assigned as consultant. It is used globally within the company, and primarily for archiving/storing data, applying retention and managing content within the Research and Development department. It addresses problems of managing content for easy retrieval, storage, applying retention - the whole document life cycle.
  • For transaction based content management, xCP product from Documentum product suite works excellent, supporting easy and fast development, huge throughput and integration with other products, like scanners etc.
  • Documentum Content Server is probably the most robust and most advanced in the ECM field, which does an excellent job out of the box but provides much of extensions to be developed for specific client needs. Yet, for companies that don't require so many features, there are definitely cheaper solutions that gets the basic ECM work done.
  • Newly changed interface approach for xCP and D2 products are quite appealing to customers and very fast, when in comparison with web based applications. Yet, with Documentum 7, even wdk is faster and more robust.
  • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
  • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
What are the document volume, the throughput - currently and expected in year, 3 years etc.? Is the company doing content management on international level, where access from multiple locations is needed - then Documentum can be good investment. What ECM system will be used for - document storage, document lifecycle or retention? Or all of the above? - Documentum works very well if all 3 items are combined, yet for storage there must be cheaper and more easily adaptable solutions available.
  • Increased document throughput and automation for transaction intense business processes.
  • Increased document turnover time for reviews and approvals.
  • Increased employee efficency
  • Easier adherence to document retention as required by governing institutions.
There are already resources that know Documentum and can do customization to meet company needs, thus changing to a different ECM would be more expensive and there would be steep learning curve.
  • Opentext Livelink 9.7/ ContentServer 10.5
While Livelink has many more modules out of the box and provide some more functionality which can be applied to document lifecycle without writing any customizations, from the support perspective Documentum is much cheaper to support and it is much more stable than Opentext ECM products.
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
Return to navigation