Good Record Updater
We use Nintex RPA is used for scraping and record updating on applications that do not have mass update features.
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)Formerly Nintex RPA LE
Starting at $85 per month
View PricingOverview
What is Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)?
Nintex RPA LE, which was based on Foxtrot powered by Enablesoft, was a suite of robotic process automation (RPA) software solutions. Foxtrot is now discontinued.
Recent Reviews
Pricing
Nintex RPA Standard
$85.00
Cloud
per month
Nintex RPA Enterprise (includes Workflow)
$135.00
Cloud
per month
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.nintex.com/pricing/#rpa
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $85 per month
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)?
Nintex RPA LE, formerly Foxtrot by EnableSoft, gives enterprises trained bots to automate routine tasks without the use of code in a drag and drop interface, an enterprise-grade process management and automation solution.
Nintex suggests Foxtrot / Nintext RPA LE users upgrade to Nintex RPA.
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) Video
Robotic process automation (RPA) helps your employees do more with less.
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) Competitors
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) Technical Details
| Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
| Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Nintex RPA LE, which was based on Foxtrot powered by Enablesoft, was a suite of robotic process automation (RPA) software solutions. Foxtrot is now discontinued.
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) starts at $85.
Automation Anywhere, UiPath Automation Platform, and SS&C Blue Prism Intelligent Automation are common alternatives for Foxtrot RPA (discontinued).
The most common users of Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(6)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-3 of 3)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
March 10, 2020
Good Record Updater
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We use Nintex RPA is used for scraping and record updating on applications that do not have mass update features.
- Mass updating of account records.
- Works well scraping data from web sites.
- Can update any type of electronic record/application.
- Could be a bit more user-friendly.
- Program not freezing up because of web site performance.
- Easier error checking.
- Save time in mass updates.
- Accurate logging of inserting records.
My bank uses Foxtrot in multiple departments. I use Foxtrot to make changes within Fiserv's Navigator, Accounts Payable, General Ledger, Access Manager, and Director to name a few. I also use Foxtrot in different web-based programs. I have also used it within Laser Pro and a program called AccuAccount. I use three of four licenses, and the fourth license is being used by our service department to run daily scripts for returned mail that I built. The possibilities are endless. And I constantly hear people say...I didn't know Foxtrot could do that.
- Being your electronic employee...cost savings.
- Foxtrot does not get task blind. It just continues to work and doesn't get tired of doing the same thing over and over.
- The variety of building scripts. No two people will build a script the same way.
- Foxtrot support is fantastic to deal with. If you get stuck on building a script where something doesn't work they always have a way around the issue.
- Foxtrot runs in the background and can run while you complete your daily tasks.
- Foxtrot reacts differently within each page of Navigator. On some pages, I have noticed misspellings of words. This functionality has improved, but we aren't quite there for 100% accuracy.
- For what my bank uses Foxtrot for there really hasn't been an issue with functionality, as support can always work around any issues.
- Foxtrot needs a stand-alone machine or virtual machine to work, as it is using your machine and keyboard as a human would. This isn't necessarily a downfall, but can be costly when you think of having a machine for each license or bot.
- I use Foxtrot daily. Most times three machines are going. If you calculate the cost of three licenses annually to what three employees would cost, the cost savings is immense.
- Using Foxtrot to charge fees. When you use Foxtrot to access fees on accounts this is a savings in itself too. Not only are you able to get fee income, but you can add that on top of the employment savings.
- Foxtrot does not get task blind like a human would. Humans, when they get task blind, tend to make mistakes. Foxtrot has a lower error rate than a human.
Fiserv has a program to do mass changes. However, this product does not support all features within the Navigator platform. Plus that mapping program would only work within Navigator. We can use Foxtrot in multiple applications and websites. Plus comparing the cost of Foxtrot versus the mapping program annually made Foxtrot the right choice.
4
I am the main user of Foxtrot, but I do have three users in our Service Center that use Foxtrot for Returned Mail. I use Foxtrot in all areas within the bank.
2
Once Foxtrot is installed on a PC or virtual machine there isn't much for the IT support to do.
- Functionality
- Cost Savings
- Mass change ability
- Daily returned mail
- Fee charges on gift cards
- Block creations to charge fees to customer accounts
- GL creations, deletions and transfer history
- We are always looking to see what Foxtrot can do next. Every time a problem presents itself people are thinking-- Can Foxtrot do this?
- To get out in front of users of other programs would be helpful, as we may be able to create a script for them so that they can work on more important business initiatives.
April 02, 2019
My review of Foxtrot RPA
Foxtrot is currently being used at the organization level. It is a fantastic tool in serving as a force multiplier. It allows us to efficiently perform mass maintenance operations within a few hours. The best part is that it does so by mimicking the data input of an actual person, so no backend coding or programming is required and neither is the support of IT. In addition, it allows for the natural audit logs and monitoring of applications to still pick up any operations done by the tool organically.
We utilize it in addition for remote process automation tasks. We have been able to phase out several manual processes and schedule automated script tasks, which can perform the operations much quicker and with virtually no errors.
We utilize it in addition for remote process automation tasks. We have been able to phase out several manual processes and schedule automated script tasks, which can perform the operations much quicker and with virtually no errors.
- Automating repetitive data input tasks.
- Allows for the development of quick solutions without the need for IT.
- Provide robust functionality for the automation of manual tasks.
- It could use better handling of emulator response times and states. For example, oftentimes the tool moves faster than the emulator can perform tasks and the whole process can crash, forcing the user to start over.
- It could use a drag and drop workflow interface, which might make it easier to create complex scripts.
- As previously mentioned, Foxtrot has allowed us to become infinitely more efficient in handling mass maintenance scenarios within the organization. It has allowed us to go from development to deployment often within a couple of days including testing.
- It has further allowed for the remote automation of manual tasks performed on a daily basis and freed up that time so that the resources can be more efficient within their functions and get more things done.
- The tool has allowed for the creation of several template scripts that can be utilized anytime for similar situations, which has made us even more efficient in that the development of the script only happens one time and provides for infinite uses without any additional overhead.
Foxtrot does not have nearly as much in terms of functionality and workflow tools. It is primarily meant for automating and creating scripts that help with mainframe-based maintenance and migration tasks. In addition, it is very efficient in simulating the actions of an individual for daily and manual tasks. We selected Foxtrot because it was the tool that was recommended by the main vendor we needed to interface with, and industry-wide it was the main tool being used by other financial institutions with similar platforms to perform the tasks that we bought the platform to perform.