Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Graylog

Graylog

Overview

What is Graylog?

Graylog, headquartered in Houston, offers their eponymous platform for centralized log management that helps users find meaning in data faster so as to take action immediately. Graylog is available via Enterprise and Cloud plans, but also has a Small Business…

Read more

Learn from top reviewers

Return to navigation

Product Demos

Demo GrayLog 2 with Laravel5 app

YouTube

Demo GrayLog 2 with Rails app

YouTube

Send Syslog from MuleSoft RTF to GrayLog

YouTube

Graylog Security

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Graylog?

Graylog Video

Tour of Graylog v4.0

Graylog Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsWindows, Linux, ,
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Graylog, headquartered in Houston, offers their eponymous platform for centralized log management that helps users find meaning in data faster so as to take action immediately. Graylog is available via Enterprise and Cloud plans, but also has a Small Business Plan, and an Open (free) plan with limited features.

Splunk Enterprise, Datadog, and Logz.io are common alternatives for Graylog.

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 3.6.

The most common users of Graylog are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews From Top Reviewers

(1-5 of 7)

Level Up Your Logging

Rating: 7 out of 10
June 30, 2019
Vetted Review
Verified User
Graylog
3 years of experience
Graylog is used to aggregate logs and SNMP traps from our network devices and Linux servers. We not only aggregate and store logs but extract values to make logging more searchable than using flat files with BASH utilities (grep, cut, awk, etc) to search. For our critical devices, we also use it to forward logs to a room in our private chat service via a custom integration.
  • Graylog does a great job of its core function: log aggregation, retention, and searching.
  • Graylog has a very flexible configuration. The backend for storage is Elasticsearch and MongoDB is used to store the configuration. You have to option to make your configuration as simple as possible by storing everything on one box, or you can scale everything out horizontally by using a cluster of Elasticsearch nodes and MongoDB servers with several Graylog servers pointed to all the necessary nodes.
  • Graylog does a good job of abstracting away a fair portion of Elasticsearch index management (sharding, creation, deletion, rotation, etc).
Cons
  • Some aspects of Graylog are less than intuitive. For example, if you want to run different extractor rules on different device types due to format differences, you need to create different inputs. Since inputs are their own processes that require ports to be bound to them, you either need different IP addresses for each input or a different (read: non-standard) port, which can make the device configuration more complicated.
  • Although Graylog abstracts quite a bit of Elasticsearch management away, it is by no means a turnkey solution. Upgrades to Graylog can require upgrades to Elasticsearch, which occasionally requires manual intervention to Elasticsearch. Same goes for mongo. If you're looking to scale out, there is some documentation to get you started, but the heavy lifting is on you.
  • As everything is stored in Elasticsearch, there are no more flat files to tail; moving from a "traditional" logging aggregator like Syslog(-ng), a culture change is going to be required.
If you already have a basic understanding of Elasticsearch and/or MongoDB, Graylog will be a great fit when it comes to log aggregation. It will be a decent option even if you don't have any experience but have the time and willingness to roll up your sleeves that learning those tools will require. Graylog supports plugins to extend functionality for things like SNMP traps, telemetry collection, and solar flares. As is the case with most software with plugins, if the core functionality for which you are looking (i.e. not logging) is based on a plugin, Graylog probably isn't for you. The majority of the plugins in the marketplace are developed by third-parties looking to solve their specific use case so bug fixes and new features are not a given.

Liven up your logging with Graylog!

Rating: 9 out of 10
December 09, 2019
Vetted Review
Verified User
Graylog
2 years of experience
We use Graylog to collect messages from a variety of different systems like network switch and routers to wifi controllers. We use Graylog to group and create graphs to show specific information. We also use Graylog to send messages to us to alert of certain activities. Graylog is widely used in our office because it is cost-effective and the ability to be tweak for each team.
  • The ability to add and remove information to the messages. This makes it so you can customize each message and get the information you really want.
  • Being able to search for different criteria allows finding the exact data you want without having to manually filter the data.
  • Searching tends to be quick and is able to process large amounts of data quickly so you don't have to wait forever for your data.
Cons
  • The graphs and visualizations are limited on the dashboard if there were more options it would be better for different kinds of data.
Graylog can collect messages and group them, so if you want to get alerted when there is an abnormal amount of particular messages, Graylog can do that. Graylog can be used to analyze traffic, and if traffic over a certain level and is sustained for an amount of time, it can send the information of which mac addresses are causing the traffic influx.

Clean, robust and intuitive central logging

Rating: 7 out of 10
January 18, 2022
Vetted Review
Verified User
Graylog
6 years of experience
We have more than 60 applications, ranging from websites, Winforms, windows services, API's and console executables. All of them need to log their tracing and/or error information to a central location. It needs to be central because you don't want to search for this location, especially when you only have 5 minutes to solve a problem. We used to have a dedicated database for logging, but this does not eliminate the time lost searching for "the" logs. Also, [the] configuration used to be a manual and self-made business that wasn't always clear. Graylog is a dedicated logging solution that comes "out of the box" and is made accessible through a well-known plugin architecture (log4net if you're developing with the .NET framework).
  • Nice search interface and powerful search options
  • JSON extractor to "extract" variables and values from JSON input.
  • Clear and intuitive dashboards
Cons
  • In the front end, the search "tricks" could have been made a little easier to find. There seems to be some kind of "search language" where you can use keywords like "AND" and "OR," etc. (much like SQL language). But it's totally unclear what does work and what doesn't. If you don't know that it's there, you'll never find it. Of course, after you do know it, you can find many examples online on how to use it.
  • The backend is not for the inexperienced. Graylog is based on elastic search and MongoDB. And it's Linux. This means that Graylog is actually 3 applications that you need to configure in a Linux environment. This means that you need quite some experience to get this running. Fortunately, though, things are kept as simple as possible. What I mean is that at first, the task seems daunting, but then you'll find that there's not much to it after all.
  • We've had multiple occasions that disk size was full or indexes went larger than allowed. When this happens, the systems can become corrupt. The solution is to just delete the indexes, but it took quite some time to find this out.
  • We disabled "Automatic updates" on the Linux server because unattended updates always lead to problems. This is not a real problem, or solely related to Graylog, but worth mentioning. Updates are best handled manually.
For small companies, Graylog is the best solution possible. It's easy to configure and "just works." Above everything else, it's free. The only thing I hold against it is the fact that it's Linux-based. [This] makes sense because Elasticsearch is Linux-based. But Linux adds a layer of complexity that we don't need for something basic as a logging server. I'm pretty sure that we would have had a logging server years earlier if I had to convince quite a few decision-making people to go ahead with it anyway.

Graylog can compete against the big boys.

Rating: 9 out of 10
January 29, 2020
JC
Vetted Review
Verified User
Graylog
3 years of experience
We currently use Graylog as a log aggregator and some light weight SEIM. However, we haven't had the cycles to use the other features of it. Presently solves our centralized log collection problem.
  • Log Aggregation pipeline
  • Dashboards
Cons
  • Pricing for Enterprise is a bit unrealistic.
  • Archiving should be a standard feature in the community edition.
Graylog is suited for all environments. Its easy setup and use is great for small businesses. Its flexibility for configuration of ingested logs is excellent for medium to large scale, and its ingest capability is great for super-sized. One size fits all for Graylog. It's a great competitor to QRadar and Splunk, and even AlienVault USM/OSSIM

Graylog is GREAT

Rating: 9 out of 10
December 05, 2018
Vetted Review
Verified User
Graylog
1 year of experience
We use Graylog to view all of our system logs in one place. We use this software to back up our logs so in the event we need to review them we can go back as far as we need to. This software allows us to collect all our data easily.
  • Manages logs for a variety of devices
  • Easy to set up
  • A great open source solution
Cons
  • If you don't know your way around Linux setup would be tricky. Some step by step videos would be helpful.
This is well suited for a small to medium sized environment where you are looking to collect all your system logs. In larger scale environments it would be trickier to pull this software off. The software can only handle a certain amount of logs per second, if you have lots of devices you should invest in a more premium product.
Return to navigation