After 4 years, still not convinced ...
It is used to "program" campaigns. 2/3 of the campaigns are one shot, 1/3 is recurrent. 1/2 are commercial campaigns, 1/2 are administrative campaigns to inform clients of p.e. changes in interest rates and so on.
- The most powerful in Unica are the audience swaps. They are very helpful for cleaning up audiences like households, if one of the members of a household has a product, you can easily exclude the whole audience.
- When working with segments in a flow, this goes really fast.
- The use of templates is easy and helps to standardise the working process.
- The mappings of tables can be different in every campaign
- We are only using Unica for the selection part of campaigns, I think things go twice as slow as before when we were working in SAS, but it is difficult to compare, as the people doing the work in SAS had all up to 20 years of experience and those working with Unica now are all new people. The people who liked to do the campaign selections with SAS did not like to work with UNICA, so they left, and with them also their experience.
- Selections for the call centers
- Sending email messages
- Selections for surveys
- none
- none
- Product Reputation
- Positive Sales Experience with the Vendor
- Vendor implemented
- Implemented in-house
- technical test fase
- user test fase
- production test fase
- The design of the underlying datamart
- The difficulties of setting up response tracking
- If you don't make complex selections, the interface is simple to use.
- With few explanations, you can make simple selections.
- the use of date functions in selections
- the right way of mapping the used tables seems to be difficult for beginning user