TrustRadius Insights
User-Friendly Interface: Many users have found the system to be user-friendly and easy to manage, with simple settings and management that …
Overview
What is HPE BladeSystem?
HPE BladeSystem is a brand of blade server, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise. HPE blades include the ProLiant BL series and the ProLiant WS series.
Recent Reviews
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is HPE BladeSystem?
HPE BladeSystem Technical Details
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
|---|---|
| Mobile Application | No |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(25)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Pros
- Cons
User-Friendly Interface: Many users have found the system to be user-friendly and easy to manage, with simple settings and management that simplify tasks. They appreciate the intuitive design and straightforward controls that make it effortless for them to navigate through the system.
Scalability: Several reviewers have praised the scalability of the solution, noting that it allows for the easy expansion of resources and the ability to fit multiple servers into a standard 19-inch rack. This flexibility in scaling up or down provides users with the freedom to adapt their infrastructure according to their evolving needs.
High Degree of Redundancy: The high degree of redundancy provided by the system has been appreciated by users, as it ensures the reliability and availability of hardware resources. With redundant components and failover mechanisms in place, customers can rely on uninterrupted operations even in case of hardware failures.
Buggy Management Console: Some users have experienced bugs in the management console, which can be frustrating and impact their ability to efficiently manage the system. They have reported encountering issues with the functionality and reliability of the console.
Limited Configuration Methods: Users feel that the configuration methods are limited to only web GUI and SSH command line, which restricts their flexibility and may not cater to all user preferences. This limitation hampers their ability to configure the system according to their specific requirements.
Outdated Virtual Connect Web GUI: The virtual connect web GUI still uses flash, which is seen as somewhat dated by users who would prefer a more modern interface. They believe that an updated web GUI using newer technologies would enhance usability and provide a better user experience.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-11 of 11)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
- It's possible to fit 16 servers onto a standard 19-inch rack.
- Physical server administration consolidation.
- It is scalable and reliable. The technical help is also excellent.
- With the potential for disaster posed by having all your servers in one physical location, it's important to invest in redundancy.
- I have never encountered a faster response time.
- Although pricey, it has a rock-solid reliability and HP's service is lightning fast and reliable.
- Sever profiles allow workload migration between hardware.
- Uses shared high-bandwidth uplinks to provide highly versatile system wiring.
- You can fit 16 servers into the same amount of space as 8 servers in a 4U server rack.
- Shared infrastructure, like interconnects, increases fault domain.
- A blade server's tiny size prevents expansion cards.
- Administrators should closely monitor firmware recipes and packages to maintain component compatibility.
- Power management was integrated.
- It doesn't necessitate a huge server closet.
- Network administration is integrated (Virtual Connect).
- When using virtual connect, you, and not the network team, are in charge of managing the local area network and wide area network.
- In terms of fan management, when only a portion of the Blade Enclosure is in use, it is imperative that all Blades be located in the same area.
- It's not easy and is somewhat dated to manage FW.
July 02, 2022
This server is secure and stable in any setting.
- It ensures substantial process and system security in terms of infrastructure by keeping things running smoothly all the time.
- There are few things that are more helpful in day-to-day living than having straightforward controls and configurations.
- Capacity to keep a highly redundant system operating reliably.
- The absence of a unified dashboard for monitoring health and progress.
- Not enough reports to management.
- Improved methods for installing new firmware are needed.
- User-friendly.
- Implement and manage resources.
- The tech support is excellent.
- The scalability of the solution is good.
- Redundancy is a big part of this system's strength.
- Simple settings and management simplify tasks.
- Management console bugs sometimes.
- Integrations need better management.
- Virtual connections have room for improvement.
February 24, 2022
Safe and reliable server for any type of environment.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
- Reliable system with high availability of hardware resources.
- Perfect for virtualization service.
- Ease and perform resource management and implementation.
- Reliable HPE warranty and technical support.
- Robust and reliable.
- Limitation of expansion of add-on cards.
- Service interruptions in general update procedures.
February 22, 2022
HPE BladeSystem - Great Solution
- Ability to maintain an environment with a high degree of redundancy.
- Simplicity in settings and management are great facilitators in everyday life.
- By maintaining an environment with high availability, it guarantees significant security of processes and systems in terms of infrastructure.
- Firmware update process could be better
- Lack of management reports
- Lack of a dashboard centralizing status and performance
April 01, 2021
HPE BladeSystem is the Rolls Royce of server management
- Expandable
- Easy to manage
- Included power management
- Included network management (Virtual Connect)
- FW management is a little tricky and outdated
- With virtual connect, you are responsible for correct LAN/WAN management, not the network team
- Very Flexible
- With Virtual Connect you have a very powerfull Network Module for Management
- Easy Maintenance
- Scale Up is not a problem
- It doesn't take that much rack space
- Long Boot Time (Perhaps in most HPE Servers)
- Fan Management, when you not using the whole Blade Enclosure make sure all Blades are on one site.
- Limitation in Hardware because of thermik
March 14, 2021
HPE BladeSystem: Used for Almost 10 Years
- Variety of server configurations
- Complete remotely managed server hardware, networking, connectivity, and monitoring.
- Repeatable configurations
- Configuration methods: Only Web GUI and SSH command line.
- Virtual Connect web GUI still uses flash :(
- Bay-to-server-to-card hardware "mapping" is kind of confusing at first.
September 27, 2017
BladeSystem provides user dense compute without compromise
- Increase the density of compute with 16 servers in 10U of rack space.
- Shares high-bandwidth uplinks to flexibly wire the fabric for the systems.
- Provides the ability to migrate workloads between physical hardware easily with server profiles.
- The small form factor of a blade server cannot accommodate expansion cards.
- Shared infrastructure, like the interconnects, means a larger fault domain.
- Firmware updates can be disruptive and administrators should pay close attention to firmware recipes and bundles to ensure compatibility between components.