Skip to main content
TrustRadius
iApplicants

iApplicants

Overview

What is iApplicants?

iApplicants is a cloud-based ATS that offers batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels, resume parsing, and data management. This particular platform is sought and used by small to midsize companies and is offered on a flexible…

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

iApplicants is a versatile Applicant Tracking System, offering a range of use cases that provide a cost-effective solution for companies. …
Continue reading

Happy with iApplicant!

8 out of 10
June 27, 2014
Incentivized
About three years ago we implemented the iApplicants system for our applicant tracking system. Prior to iApplicants candidates would apply …
Continue reading

iApplicants review

10 out of 10
May 06, 2014
We are using IApplicants to track applicants for our currently openings. All hiring managers also have access to review potential …
Continue reading

Innovative Tool!

10 out of 10
January 24, 2014
When I was the HR Recruiter for Elk Valley Health Services, I received all applications from nurses and nurse aides through iApplicants …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

ATS

$800.00

Cloud
per year

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is iApplicants?

iApplicants is a cloud-based ATS developed by Job Match, LLC.This product offers the full suite of features typical of applicant tracking systems: a user-friendly interface and mobile app, batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels such as email or by leveraging its integration with social networking sites (e.g. LinkedIn) and commonly used applications (e.g. Outlook), automated phone screens, instantaneous posting to multiple job boards, resume parsing, and data and document uploading. This particular platform is sought and used by small to midsize companies and is offered on a flexible payment schedule, including a no contract month-to-month payment plan or on a fee schedule better structured to accommodate light users and small business. Transitioning and implementation is supported via live business hours customer support. A free demo and free live consultation are both available to familiarize potential buyers with the platform.

iApplicants Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

iApplicants is a cloud-based ATS that offers batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels, resume parsing, and data management. This particular platform is sought and used by small to midsize companies and is offered on a flexible payment schedule.

CareerSiteBuilder, SmartRecruiters, and JazzHR are common alternatives for iApplicants.

Reviewers rate Notifications and Alerts and Reporting highest, with a score of 10.

The most common users of iApplicants are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(12)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

iApplicants is a versatile Applicant Tracking System, offering a range of use cases that provide a cost-effective solution for companies. Users appreciate the ability to post job openings to multiple sites and track applications, streamlining the recruiting process. HR departments find it valuable in managing applicant flow, pre-screening candidates, and communicating with hiring managers through status codes and notes. The system eliminates the need for excessive emails and paper copies of resumes, making communication with applicants quick and efficient.

Employers in the hospitality industry particularly benefit from iApplicants' community job board, which accommodates both employer-assisted and self-set up accounts. This feature supports economic development by connecting job seekers with potential employers in the hospitality sector. Users have praised iApplicants as one of the best vendors to work with due to its highly responsive and accommodating nature.

Recruiters find iApplicants invaluable in managing limited job opportunities. The system allows them to cull candidates effectively and administer tests for evaluation purposes. With iApplicants, HR departments maintain an organized flow in the hiring process that involves supervisors and managers. Automated responses and applicant self-update features contribute to a positive experience for candidates.

Additionally, iApplicants facilitates timely filling of open positions by seamlessly passing applications from the HR department to hiring managers for review. It simplifies the recruitment process through phone call screenings by HR recruiters, who can then forward their notes to Field Staff Supervisors for face-to-face interviews. The system also assists with the rejection process by sending rejection letters to applicants who are not a potential fit.

For service industry organizations, iApplicants offers reporting tools, application modification based on position, and efficient tracking of applicants by status. By posting job openings to multiple sites, it enhances online visibility and expands reach to a larger audience of prospects. As a cost-effective solution, iApplicants meets the applicant tracking needs of small businesses at an excellent price point.

Managers appreciate how iApplicants reduces paper usage by only printing materials for candidates that require further consideration, making it easier to review and assess applicants through email. The system offers flexibility by allowing different departments and managers to access and manage applications for specific positions. Lastly, iApplicants effectively helps track applicants for current openings, enabling hiring managers to review potential candidates and facilitating communication between recruiters and candidates.

Overall, iApplicants proves to be a highly valuable tool in the hiring process, providing a streamlined and organized approach to managing applicants while reducing administrative burden and improving efficiency.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-2 of 2)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Adam Ingber | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
iApplicants is used as our Applicant Tracking System. Through iApplicants, I am able to post jobs to multiple sites. Although it does not have all the bells and whistles of a more sophisticated ATS, for my company It is the most cost effective solution. We use the system to house all resumes that come in through our job postings. Some managers are able to use the system more effectively than others to communicate their hiring needs.
  • Easy to use
  • Cost effective
  • Great technical suport
  • Search capability
  • Reporting features
How many employees does your company have? I believe it is suitable for companies similar in size to mine or with fewer employees. I believe larger size companies should only use iApplicants if they hire employees in bulk. Meaning if they make simple hires it would be an excellent product for them. Because of the limited search capability, it may not be suitable for everyone.
  • Time to fill
  • Ease of use
Taleo, ATS module from Sage

I use iApplicants simply for the pricing. I would prefer a more robust product, but for the dollars, I'm paying currently, iApplicants gives me the best bang for my buck!
Unless someone else can give me similar pricing, I can't imagine I'd go elsewhere. I have renewed for several years now. I also have dealt with the same individuals over this time, which I greatly appreciate.
3
Human Resources
1
I prefer that only HR folks be involved in the day to day use. Resumes are distributed from the system via email to hiring managers. If many applicants are chosen for phone screens or interviews after an initial submission period, a report is configured and sent via email to the hiring managers for discussion.
  • Pricing
  • Ease of use
  • Customer Support
  • The screener questions help weed out resume submissions for some roles
  • If search capabilities and reporting capabilities become more robust, I can see some additional usage.
No
  • Price
  • Positive Sales Experience with the Vendor
Pricing. I don't believe there is another product with the same look and feel for the price.
I wouldn't change the process. It was fair and streamlined. iApplicants was the most budget friendly product for my company at the time.
  • Implemented in-house
No
Change management was minimal
The easier a system is to use, the quicker it is to master.
  • No issues
Great product support!
No
Not necessary. Support is provided with my annual service.
Great people. Have dealt with same individual(s) for several years.
Yes
Fixed issue within 24 hours. Any changes I have requested have also been made within 24 hours.
I had to add a user to our account in just the last week. I had not done it in a quite some time, so I clicked on the support icon, and I had a new user account up and running within minutes thanks to the online support.
  • Creating Job Postings
  • Using Screener Questions
  • Sending job posts to job sites
  • Reporting is limited
  • Search is limited
No
Easy to use but wish it had additional search and reporting features.
Kia Summers | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
At my former employer I was responsible for the implementation of iApplicants. They had no ATS system previously. I assisted our implementation manager in setting the system up based on our company needs, trained the recruiters in using it and developed the reference materials for our team. I also as the lead recruiter utilized it daily to manage our applicant flow.
  • I think posting jobs is particularly easy, our prior system was time consuming and complicated. With iApplicants we reduced our time to post new positions from roughly 3-4 hours down to approximately 15 minutes depending on the number of sites you wanted to push the postings to.
  • The applicant screening questions were the best feature for a team with a large number of requisitions and a limited number of recruiters. This simple feature allowed us to sort through hundreds of candidates in a matter of minutes and identify the top 5-10 to forward to the hiring manager for review.
  • I like having the ability to set up access in the system for hiring managers to review candidates at their convenience. It reduces the need for active communication between the recruiter and the hiring manager regarding the status of incoming resumes.
  • The version we used didn't have the look and feel of more sophisticated ATS systems, which often feel more user friendly. It would be nice if it had less of a database format.
  • The posting feature utilized a third party which was great but didn't post to real time and required some follow up administratively. The feature of posting from the system is fantastic and the number of options is great but for sites that require manual entry and approval just knowing you are waiting on a third party company to manually enter those postings, have them approved and then verify they have actually been posted live requires a bit more follow up than I prefer.
  • We had a posting delete and no technical explanation as to why or how. It took someone several days to realize it was gone which lost traction and was alarming when we realized that the technical support team had no idea how it happened or what could prevent it from happening again. Needless to say that led to having to verify all postings were active daily for several weeks after which was time consuming when you have 30 open requisitions at a time.
I think iApplicants is a great place to start if you are trying to implement a web based ATS system. It doesn't have all of the enhanced features of the more robust systems but for the cost it can't be beat.
  • Our recruiting team were all contractors costing between $30-$40/hour and the idea of new positions taking 3-4 hours to post to all of our required sites was extremely costly in addition to the cost per ad. The reduction in time to post one position a month paid for the system each month.
  • The previous system we used was manual and time consuming iApplicants allowed us to increase the speed of our lead conversion, reduce the time our requisitions were open and provide better customer service to our hiring managers through better applicant flow.
  • The ROI was tremendous, the reduction in time to fill open positions, reduce cost of contractor hours spent on administrative tasks and the ability to source candidates from previous applicants in our database made iApplicants the best investment for our team in 2013.
I've tested several vendor ATS systems to find iApplicants, used several systems developed for prior employers and used Taleo. iApplicants, for the investment is definitely worth the cost.
The system does what we needed it to do and has allowed us to become more efficient in our recruiting efforts.
5
Recruiting for the entire enterprise.
0
We have an external vendor that does technical support.
  • Applicant screening
  • Job posting
  • Resume routing
  • Providing access for hiring managers to view activity at their convenience.
  • The implementation of the requisition system.
No
  • Price
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
  • Third-party Reviews
I would do a cost benefit analysis of the products to ensure that we are truly evaluating the benefit of the system before basing a decision solely on price.
  • Vendor implemented
  • Implemented in-house
Yes
Set up, testing, live implementation.
Change management was minimal
  • None
Things went very smoothly.
Yes
The support we needed we always received timely.
Yes
We had a requisition delete with no record of it other than the print out showing where it was posted. The issue couldn't be resolved because technical support had no idea what happened. We did not have the capability of deleting positions.
My VP was very demanding and often unrealistic so the support team often had requests that were made with unrealistic turnaround times, delivery expectations outside of the realm of the systems capability and yet they always handled the requests quickly and with professionalism.
  • Entering new positions
  • Posting jobs to websites
  • Routing resumes to hiring managers
  • none
The system is very user friendly.
Return to navigation